Comparison between self-reported smoking habits and daily ad-libitum smoking topography in a group of Korean smokers.

Environmental analysis, health and toxicology Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-18 DOI:10.5620/eaht.2022020
Jiyeon Yang, Shervin Hashemi, Chaelin Lee, Wonseok Han, Yoojin Song, Youngwook Lim
{"title":"Comparison between self-reported smoking habits and daily ad-libitum smoking topography in a group of Korean smokers.","authors":"Jiyeon Yang,&nbsp;Shervin Hashemi,&nbsp;Chaelin Lee,&nbsp;Wonseok Han,&nbsp;Yoojin Song,&nbsp;Youngwook Lim","doi":"10.5620/eaht.2022020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tobacco smoking is associated with a high global mortality rate since it is known to cause cancers and lung and heart diseases. To control and reduce annual mortality attributed to smoking, it is essential to design applicable smoke cessation programs based on realistic tobacco exposure risk assessment. In this regard, understanding the smoking habits of the smoker is crucial. Using self-report smoking habit surveys is a common approach in measuring basic variables of smoking habits. However, smoking topography measurement devices have recently become available for investigating smoking habit variables accurately. In this study, we conducted a self-report survey to investigate a group of Korean smokers' smoking habit variables such as the number of smoked cigarettes per day, puff counts, and total smoking time. The survey also included items from the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND). The results were compared with the corresponding variables from machine-determined data to investigate their correlation and reliability. Results indicate that Korean smokers have a reliable understanding of the average number of cigarettes they smoke daily (ρ = 0.517, Cronbach's α = 0.754) and the time to first cigarette (TTFC) after waking up (ρ = -0.587, Cronbach's α = 0.623), as fundamental items of the FTND score. Nevertheless, these smokers significantly under-reported the puff number and total smoking time, which can cause significant underestimation in the tobacco exposure risk assessment. Consequently, we suggest the application of self-report surveys that are based on the amount of daily smoked cigarettes (e.g. FTND) for clinical or risk assessment purposes. Using smoking topography measurement devices is recommended overusing self-report surveys in measuring smoking habit variables such as puff count and smoking time more accurately.</p>","PeriodicalId":11867,"journal":{"name":"Environmental analysis, health and toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/15/ba/eaht-37-3-e2022020.PMC9582419.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental analysis, health and toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5620/eaht.2022020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Tobacco smoking is associated with a high global mortality rate since it is known to cause cancers and lung and heart diseases. To control and reduce annual mortality attributed to smoking, it is essential to design applicable smoke cessation programs based on realistic tobacco exposure risk assessment. In this regard, understanding the smoking habits of the smoker is crucial. Using self-report smoking habit surveys is a common approach in measuring basic variables of smoking habits. However, smoking topography measurement devices have recently become available for investigating smoking habit variables accurately. In this study, we conducted a self-report survey to investigate a group of Korean smokers' smoking habit variables such as the number of smoked cigarettes per day, puff counts, and total smoking time. The survey also included items from the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND). The results were compared with the corresponding variables from machine-determined data to investigate their correlation and reliability. Results indicate that Korean smokers have a reliable understanding of the average number of cigarettes they smoke daily (ρ = 0.517, Cronbach's α = 0.754) and the time to first cigarette (TTFC) after waking up (ρ = -0.587, Cronbach's α = 0.623), as fundamental items of the FTND score. Nevertheless, these smokers significantly under-reported the puff number and total smoking time, which can cause significant underestimation in the tobacco exposure risk assessment. Consequently, we suggest the application of self-report surveys that are based on the amount of daily smoked cigarettes (e.g. FTND) for clinical or risk assessment purposes. Using smoking topography measurement devices is recommended overusing self-report surveys in measuring smoking habit variables such as puff count and smoking time more accurately.

Abstract Image

韩国吸烟者自我报告吸烟习惯与每日随意吸烟地形的比较。
吸烟与全球高死亡率有关,因为已知吸烟会导致癌症、肺病和心脏病。为了控制和减少每年因吸烟导致的死亡率,必须根据现实的烟草暴露风险评估设计适用的戒烟计划。在这方面,了解吸烟者的吸烟习惯是至关重要的。使用自我报告吸烟习惯调查是测量吸烟习惯基本变量的常用方法。然而,吸烟地形测量装置最近可以用来准确地调查吸烟习惯变量。在这项研究中,我们进行了一项自我报告调查,以调查一组韩国吸烟者的吸烟习惯变量,如每天吸烟的数量,吸烟次数和总吸烟时间。调查还包括Fagerström尼古丁依赖测试(FTND)的项目。将结果与机器确定数据中的相应变量进行比较,以研究它们的相关性和可靠性。结果表明,韩国吸烟者对他们每天平均吸烟的数量(ρ = 0.517, Cronbach's α = 0.754)和起床后第一次吸烟的时间(TTFC)有可靠的了解,这是FTND评分的基本项目(ρ = -0.587, Cronbach's α = 0.623)。然而,这些吸烟者严重低估了吸烟次数和总吸烟时间,这可能导致烟草暴露风险评估的严重低估。因此,我们建议应用基于每日吸烟数量(如FTND)的自我报告调查来进行临床或风险评估。建议使用吸烟地形测量装置,过度使用自我报告调查来更准确地测量吸烟习惯变量,如吸烟次数和吸烟时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信