Opt-in Vs. Opt-out of Organ Donation in Scotland: Bioethical analysis.

IF 1.5 Q2 ETHICS
Allister Lee, Joseph Tham
{"title":"Opt-in Vs. Opt-out of Organ Donation in Scotland: Bioethical analysis.","authors":"Allister Lee,&nbsp;Joseph Tham","doi":"10.1080/20502877.2022.2095714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper looks at the ethics of opt-in vs. opt-out of organ donation as Scotland has transitioned its systems to promote greater organ availability. We first analyse studies that compare the donation rates in other regions due to such a system switch and find that organ increase is inconclusive and modest at best. This is due to a lack of explicit opt-out choices resulting in greater resistance and family override unless there are infrastructures and greater awareness to support such change. The paper then looks at the difference between informed consent of the opt-in vs. presumed consent in the opt-out approaches. Patient autonomy and dignity are better reflected with informed consent. Eighteen months have passed since the new organ donation policy has come into effect, this paper recommends more research into organ donors' psychological motivations to help governments and the healthcare profession obtain more organs for transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":43760,"journal":{"name":"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body","volume":" ","pages":"341-349"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Bioethics-A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2022.2095714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper looks at the ethics of opt-in vs. opt-out of organ donation as Scotland has transitioned its systems to promote greater organ availability. We first analyse studies that compare the donation rates in other regions due to such a system switch and find that organ increase is inconclusive and modest at best. This is due to a lack of explicit opt-out choices resulting in greater resistance and family override unless there are infrastructures and greater awareness to support such change. The paper then looks at the difference between informed consent of the opt-in vs. presumed consent in the opt-out approaches. Patient autonomy and dignity are better reflected with informed consent. Eighteen months have passed since the new organ donation policy has come into effect, this paper recommends more research into organ donors' psychological motivations to help governments and the healthcare profession obtain more organs for transplantation.

苏格兰器官捐献的选择与退出:生物伦理分析。
本文着眼于选择加入与选择退出器官捐赠的伦理,因为苏格兰已经过渡了其系统,以促进更大的器官可用性。我们首先分析了比较其他地区由于这种系统转换而导致的捐献率的研究,发现器官增加是不确定的,充其量是适度的。这是由于缺乏明确的退出选择,导致更大的抵制和家庭推翻,除非有基础设施和更大的意识来支持这种改变。然后,论文着眼于选择加入的知情同意与选择退出方法中的推定同意之间的差异。患者的自主和尊严在知情同意中得到更好的体现。新的器官捐献政策已经实施了18个月,本文建议对器官捐献者的心理动机进行更多的研究,以帮助政府和医疗保健行业获得更多的器官用于移植。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信