Assessing Pediatric Life Support Skills Using Augmented Reality Medical Simulation With Eye Tracking: A Pilot Study.

Jimmy Qian, Asheen Rama, Ellen Wang, Tammy Wang, Olivia Hess, Michael Khoury, Christian Jackson, Thomas J Caruso
{"title":"Assessing Pediatric Life Support Skills Using Augmented Reality Medical Simulation With Eye Tracking: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Jimmy Qian,&nbsp;Asheen Rama,&nbsp;Ellen Wang,&nbsp;Tammy Wang,&nbsp;Olivia Hess,&nbsp;Michael Khoury,&nbsp;Christian Jackson,&nbsp;Thomas J Caruso","doi":"10.46374/volxxiv_issue3_qian","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Augmented reality (AR) and eye tracking are promising adjuncts for medical simulation, but they have remained distinct tools. The recently developed Chariot Augmented Reality Medical (CHARM) Simulator combines AR medical simulation with eye tracking. We present a novel approach to applying eye tracking within an AR simulation to assess anesthesiologists during an AR pediatric life support simulation. The primary aim was to explore clinician performance in the simulation. Secondary outcomes explored eye tracking as a measure of shockable rhythm recognition and participant satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anesthesiology residents, pediatric anesthesiology fellows, and attending pediatric anesthesiologists were recruited. Using CHARM, they participated in a pediatric crisis simulation. Performance was scored using the Anesthesia-centric Pediatric Advanced Life Support (A-PALS) scoring instrument, and eye tracking data were analyzed. The Simulation Design Scale measured participant satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine each of residents, fellows, and attendings participated for a total of 27. We were able to successfully progress participants through the AR simulation as demonstrated by typical A-PALS performance scores. We observed no differences in performance across training levels. Eye tracking data successfully allowed comparisons of time to rhythm recognition across training levels, revealing no differences. Finally, simulation satisfaction was high across all participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the agreement between A-PALS score and gaze patterns is promising, further research is needed to fully demonstrate the use of AR eye tracking for medical training and assessment. Physicians of multiple training levels were satisfied with the technology.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":" ","pages":"E691"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9583759/pdf/i2333-0406-24-3-Qian.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxiv_issue3_qian","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Augmented reality (AR) and eye tracking are promising adjuncts for medical simulation, but they have remained distinct tools. The recently developed Chariot Augmented Reality Medical (CHARM) Simulator combines AR medical simulation with eye tracking. We present a novel approach to applying eye tracking within an AR simulation to assess anesthesiologists during an AR pediatric life support simulation. The primary aim was to explore clinician performance in the simulation. Secondary outcomes explored eye tracking as a measure of shockable rhythm recognition and participant satisfaction.

Methods: Anesthesiology residents, pediatric anesthesiology fellows, and attending pediatric anesthesiologists were recruited. Using CHARM, they participated in a pediatric crisis simulation. Performance was scored using the Anesthesia-centric Pediatric Advanced Life Support (A-PALS) scoring instrument, and eye tracking data were analyzed. The Simulation Design Scale measured participant satisfaction.

Results: Nine each of residents, fellows, and attendings participated for a total of 27. We were able to successfully progress participants through the AR simulation as demonstrated by typical A-PALS performance scores. We observed no differences in performance across training levels. Eye tracking data successfully allowed comparisons of time to rhythm recognition across training levels, revealing no differences. Finally, simulation satisfaction was high across all participants.

Conclusions: While the agreement between A-PALS score and gaze patterns is promising, further research is needed to fully demonstrate the use of AR eye tracking for medical training and assessment. Physicians of multiple training levels were satisfied with the technology.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用眼动追踪增强现实医学模拟评估儿科生命支持技能:一项试点研究。
背景:增强现实(AR)和眼动追踪是医学模拟的有前途的辅助工具,但它们仍然是不同的工具。最近开发的战车增强现实医疗(CHARM)模拟器将AR医疗模拟与眼动追踪相结合。我们提出了一种新颖的方法,在AR模拟中应用眼动追踪来评估AR儿科生命支持模拟中的麻醉师。主要目的是探讨临床医生在模拟中的表现。次要结果探讨眼动追踪作为可震动节奏识别和参与者满意度的测量。方法:招募麻醉住院医师、儿科麻醉研究员和儿科主治麻醉医师。使用CHARM,他们参与了一场儿科危机模拟。使用以麻醉为中心的儿科高级生命支持(A-PALS)评分仪对表现进行评分,并对眼动追踪数据进行分析。模拟设计量表测量参与者的满意度。结果:住院医师、研究员和主治医师各9人参加,共计27人。正如典型的A-PALS表现分数所证明的那样,我们能够成功地推动参与者通过AR模拟。我们观察到不同训练水平的表现没有差异。眼动追踪数据成功地比较了不同训练水平的时间和节奏识别,没有发现任何差异。最后,所有参与者的模拟满意度都很高。结论:虽然A-PALS评分和凝视模式之间的一致性是有希望的,但需要进一步的研究来充分证明AR眼动追踪在医疗培训和评估中的应用。不同培训水平的医生对该技术都很满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信