A Review of Bleeding Risk with Impella-supported High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

IF 1.9 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Heart International Pub Date : 2020-12-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.17925/HI.2020.14.2.92
George W Vetrovec, Amir Kaki, Thom G Dahle
{"title":"A Review of Bleeding Risk with Impella-supported High-risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.","authors":"George W Vetrovec,&nbsp;Amir Kaki,&nbsp;Thom G Dahle","doi":"10.17925/HI.2020.14.2.92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI) is increasingly being performed, often with mechanical circulatory support (MCS), though to date, there are limited randomised data on the efficacy of MCS for HR-PCI. The majority of MCS is provided by intra-aortic balloon pumps, but increasingly Impella® (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) heart pumps are being used. While the Impella pumps provide greater increases in cardiac output, these devices require large bore access, which has been associated with an increased risk of bleeding and vascular complications. Decisions regarding the use of Impella are often based on risk-benefit considerations, with Impella-related bleeding risk being a major factor that can impact decisions for planned use. While bleeding risk related to large bore access is a concern, published data on the risk have been quite variable. Thus, the goal of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of reports describing bleeding and vascular complications for Impella-supported HR-PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":12836,"journal":{"name":"Heart International","volume":"14 2","pages":"92-99"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9524743/pdf/heart-int-14-92.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17925/HI.2020.14.2.92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI) is increasingly being performed, often with mechanical circulatory support (MCS), though to date, there are limited randomised data on the efficacy of MCS for HR-PCI. The majority of MCS is provided by intra-aortic balloon pumps, but increasingly Impella® (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) heart pumps are being used. While the Impella pumps provide greater increases in cardiac output, these devices require large bore access, which has been associated with an increased risk of bleeding and vascular complications. Decisions regarding the use of Impella are often based on risk-benefit considerations, with Impella-related bleeding risk being a major factor that can impact decisions for planned use. While bleeding risk related to large bore access is a concern, published data on the risk have been quite variable. Thus, the goal of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of reports describing bleeding and vascular complications for Impella-supported HR-PCI.

叶轮支持的高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的出血风险综述。
复杂、高风险的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(HR-PCI)越来越多地被采用,通常伴有机械循环支持(MCS),尽管到目前为止,MCS对HR-PCI的疗效的随机数据有限。大多数MCS由主动脉内球囊泵提供,但越来越多地使用Impella®(Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA)心脏泵。虽然Impella泵可以提供更大的心输出量增加,但这些设备需要大口径通道,这与出血和血管并发症的风险增加有关。关于使用Impella的决定通常基于风险-收益考虑,与Impella相关的出血风险是影响计划使用决策的主要因素。虽然与大孔通道相关的出血风险令人担忧,但已公布的风险数据变化很大。因此,本文的目的是提供一个全面的回顾报告描述出血和血管并发症的叶轮支持的HR-PCI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart International
Heart International Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信