Comparison of three in vitro keratinocytes-fibroblasts wound healing models commonly used in pharmaceutical research.

Hui Xin Wong, Chin Chiat Lee, Paul Chi-Lui Ho
{"title":"Comparison of three in vitro keratinocytes-fibroblasts wound healing models commonly used in pharmaceutical research.","authors":"Hui Xin Wong,&nbsp;Chin Chiat Lee,&nbsp;Paul Chi-Lui Ho","doi":"10.1093/jpp/rgac046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Several common wound healing models have been used to evaluate wound healing agents and formulations, namely: conditioned media (CM), transwell co-cultures (TWCC) and co-cultures (CC) in a monolayer. However, no study has been conducted to compare the relevance of these models in the keratinocytes and fibroblasts interaction physiologically. Therefore, this study aimed to compare these models based on cell migration and proliferation, and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) expression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cell migration was analysed by scratch assay and MMP-7, while cell proliferation was analysed by (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) tetrazolium reduction assay.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Increased cell migration was observed in CM and TWCC models, while varied results were obtained in CC. Cell migration was increased due to upregulation of MMP-7 in CM and TWCC models, while it was downregulated in CC, which might have hindered migration of both cells in monolayers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CM and TWCC are more suitable than CC for wound healing research and for evaluating wound healing agents or formulations, as they can better simulate the layered tissue constructs and paracrine interactions in the physiological environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":366080,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"1220-1229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpp/rgac046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Several common wound healing models have been used to evaluate wound healing agents and formulations, namely: conditioned media (CM), transwell co-cultures (TWCC) and co-cultures (CC) in a monolayer. However, no study has been conducted to compare the relevance of these models in the keratinocytes and fibroblasts interaction physiologically. Therefore, this study aimed to compare these models based on cell migration and proliferation, and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) expression.

Methods: Cell migration was analysed by scratch assay and MMP-7, while cell proliferation was analysed by (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) tetrazolium reduction assay.

Key findings: Increased cell migration was observed in CM and TWCC models, while varied results were obtained in CC. Cell migration was increased due to upregulation of MMP-7 in CM and TWCC models, while it was downregulated in CC, which might have hindered migration of both cells in monolayers.

Conclusions: CM and TWCC are more suitable than CC for wound healing research and for evaluating wound healing agents or formulations, as they can better simulate the layered tissue constructs and paracrine interactions in the physiological environment.

药物研究中常用的三种角化细胞-成纤维细胞体外创面愈合模型的比较。
目的:几种常见的伤口愈合模型已被用于评估伤口愈合剂和配方,即:条件培养基(CM), transwell共培养(TWCC)和单层共培养(CC)。然而,目前还没有研究比较这些模型在角化细胞和成纤维细胞相互作用中的生理学相关性。因此,本研究旨在比较这些模型在细胞迁移和增殖以及基质金属蛋白酶(MMP)表达方面的差异。方法:采用划痕法和MMP-7法检测细胞迁移,采用(3-(4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基)-2,5-二苯基溴化四唑)四唑还原法检测细胞增殖。关键发现:CM和TWCC模型中细胞迁移增加,CC模型中细胞迁移增加是由于MMP-7在CM和TWCC模型中上调,而CC模型中MMP-7下调,这可能阻碍了两种细胞在单层中的迁移。结论:CM和TWCC比CC更适合于伤口愈合研究和伤口愈合剂或制剂的评价,因为它们能更好地模拟生理环境下的分层组织结构和旁分泌相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信