Optimization with photonic wave-based annealers.

A Prabhakar, P Shah, U Gautham, V Natarajan, V Ramesh, N Chandrachoodan, S Tayur
{"title":"Optimization with photonic wave-based annealers.","authors":"A Prabhakar,&nbsp;P Shah,&nbsp;U Gautham,&nbsp;V Natarajan,&nbsp;V Ramesh,&nbsp;N Chandrachoodan,&nbsp;S Tayur","doi":"10.1098/rsta.2021.0409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many NP-hard combinatorial optimization (CO) problems can be cast as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization model, which maps naturally to an Ising model. The final spin configuration in the Ising model can adiabatically arrive at a solution to a Hamiltonian, given a known set of interactions between spins. We enhance two photonic Ising machines (PIMs) and compare their performance against classical (Gurobi) and quantum (D-Wave) solvers. The temporal multiplexed coherent Ising machine (TMCIM) uses the bistable response of an electro-optic modulator to mimic the spin up and down states. We compare TMCIM performance on Max-cut problems. A spatial photonic Ising machine (SPIM) convolves the wavefront of a coherent laser beam with the pixel distribution of a spatial light modulator to adiabatically achieve a minimum energy configuration, and solve a number partitioning problem (NPP). Our computational results on Max-cut indicate that classical solvers are still a better choice, while our NPP results show that SPIM is better as the problem size increases. In both cases, connectivity in Ising hardware is crucial for performance. Our results also highlight the importance of better understanding which CO problems are most likely to benefit from which type of PIM. This article is part of the theme issue 'Quantum annealing and computation: challenges and perspectives'.</p>","PeriodicalId":286094,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences","volume":" ","pages":"20210409"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Many NP-hard combinatorial optimization (CO) problems can be cast as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization model, which maps naturally to an Ising model. The final spin configuration in the Ising model can adiabatically arrive at a solution to a Hamiltonian, given a known set of interactions between spins. We enhance two photonic Ising machines (PIMs) and compare their performance against classical (Gurobi) and quantum (D-Wave) solvers. The temporal multiplexed coherent Ising machine (TMCIM) uses the bistable response of an electro-optic modulator to mimic the spin up and down states. We compare TMCIM performance on Max-cut problems. A spatial photonic Ising machine (SPIM) convolves the wavefront of a coherent laser beam with the pixel distribution of a spatial light modulator to adiabatically achieve a minimum energy configuration, and solve a number partitioning problem (NPP). Our computational results on Max-cut indicate that classical solvers are still a better choice, while our NPP results show that SPIM is better as the problem size increases. In both cases, connectivity in Ising hardware is crucial for performance. Our results also highlight the importance of better understanding which CO problems are most likely to benefit from which type of PIM. This article is part of the theme issue 'Quantum annealing and computation: challenges and perspectives'.

基于光子波退火炉的优化。
许多NP-hard组合优化(CO)问题可以转换为二次型无约束二元优化模型,它可以自然地映射到伊辛模型。考虑到已知的自旋之间的相互作用,伊辛模型中的最终自旋构型可以绝热地得到哈密顿量的解。我们增强了两个光子伊辛机(pim),并将它们与经典(Gurobi)和量子(D-Wave)求解器的性能进行了比较。时间复用相干伊辛机(TMCIM)利用电光调制器的双稳态响应来模拟自旋上下状态。我们比较了TMCIM在最大切问题上的性能。空间光子伊辛机(SPIM)将相干激光束的波前与空间光调制器的像素分布进行卷积,以绝热实现最小能量配置,并解决了一个数字分配问题(NPP)。我们在Max-cut上的计算结果表明,经典解法仍然是更好的选择,而我们的NPP结果表明,随着问题规模的增加,SPIM解法更好。在这两种情况下,Ising硬件中的连接性对性能至关重要。我们的结果还强调了更好地理解哪种CO问题最有可能受益于哪种类型的PIM的重要性。本文是主题“量子退火与计算:挑战与展望”的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信