Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols for outpatient operations in otolaryngology: Review of literature.

Q2 Medicine
World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery Pub Date : 2022-04-18 eCollection Date: 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1002/wjo2.58
Kevin Chorath, Sara Hobday, Neeraj V Suresh, Beatrice Go, Alvaro Moreira, Karthik Rajasekaran
{"title":"Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols for outpatient operations in otolaryngology: Review of literature.","authors":"Kevin Chorath, Sara Hobday, Neeraj V Suresh, Beatrice Go, Alvaro Moreira, Karthik Rajasekaran","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are patient-centered, evidence-based pathways designed to reduce complications, promote recovery, and improve outcomes following surgery. These protocols have been successfully applied for the management of head and neck cancer, but relatively few studies have investigated the applicability of these pathways for other outpatient procedures in otolaryngology. Our goal was to perform a systematic review of available evidence reporting the utility of ERAS protocols for the management of patients undergoing outpatient otolaryngology operations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and gray literature. We identified studies that evaluated ERAS protocols among patients undergoing otologic, laryngeal, nasal/sinus, pediatric, and general otolaryngology operations. We assessed the outcomes and ERAS components across protocols as well as the study design and limitations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of eight studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Types of procedures evaluated with ERAS protocols included tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy, functional endoscopic sinus surgery, tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy, and septoplasty. A reduction in postoperative length of stay and hospital costs was reported in two and three studies, respectively. Comparative studies between ERAS and control groups showed persistent improvement in pre- and postoperative anxiety and pain levels, without an increase in postoperative complications and readmission rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A limited number of studies discuss implementation of ERAS protocols for outpatient operations in otolaryngology. These clinical pathways appear promising for these procedures as they may reduce length of stay, decrease costs, and improve pain and anxiety postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":"8 2","pages":"96-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/77/d6/WJO2-8-96.PMC9242417.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are patient-centered, evidence-based pathways designed to reduce complications, promote recovery, and improve outcomes following surgery. These protocols have been successfully applied for the management of head and neck cancer, but relatively few studies have investigated the applicability of these pathways for other outpatient procedures in otolaryngology. Our goal was to perform a systematic review of available evidence reporting the utility of ERAS protocols for the management of patients undergoing outpatient otolaryngology operations.

Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and gray literature. We identified studies that evaluated ERAS protocols among patients undergoing otologic, laryngeal, nasal/sinus, pediatric, and general otolaryngology operations. We assessed the outcomes and ERAS components across protocols as well as the study design and limitations.

Results: A total of eight studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Types of procedures evaluated with ERAS protocols included tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy, functional endoscopic sinus surgery, tympanoplasty and mastoidectomy, and septoplasty. A reduction in postoperative length of stay and hospital costs was reported in two and three studies, respectively. Comparative studies between ERAS and control groups showed persistent improvement in pre- and postoperative anxiety and pain levels, without an increase in postoperative complications and readmission rates.

Conclusions: A limited number of studies discuss implementation of ERAS protocols for outpatient operations in otolaryngology. These clinical pathways appear promising for these procedures as they may reduce length of stay, decrease costs, and improve pain and anxiety postoperatively.

耳鼻喉科门诊手术的术后恢复强化方案:文献综述。
目的:术后恢复强化方案(ERAS)是以患者为中心的循证路径,旨在减少并发症、促进术后恢复并改善术后效果。这些方案已成功应用于头颈部癌症的治疗,但对耳鼻喉科其他门诊手术是否适用这些方案的研究相对较少。我们的目标是对报道 ERAS 方案在耳鼻喉科门诊手术患者管理中的实用性的现有证据进行系统性回顾:我们使用 MEDLINE、EMBASE、SCOPUS 和灰色文献进行了系统性文献综述。我们确定了对接受耳科、喉科、鼻/窦科、儿科和普通耳鼻喉科手术的患者进行ERAS方案评估的研究。我们评估了不同方案的结果和ERAS内容,以及研究设计和局限性:结果:共有八项研究符合纳入标准并被纳入分析。采用ERAS方案进行评估的手术类型包括扁桃体切除术和腺样体切除术、功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术、鼓室成形术和乳突切除术以及鼻中隔成形术。分别有两项和三项研究报告称ERAS缩短了术后住院时间,降低了住院费用。ERAS和对照组之间的比较研究显示,术前和术后焦虑和疼痛程度持续改善,术后并发症和再入院率没有增加:有限的研究讨论了耳鼻喉科门诊手术中 ERAS 方案的实施情况。这些临床路径对这些手术似乎很有前景,因为它们可以缩短住院时间、降低成本并改善术后疼痛和焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
283
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信