Weize Lv, Min Yang, Hongcheng Zhong, Xiaojin Wang, Shuai Yang, Lei Bi, Jianzhong Xian, Xiaofeng Pei, Xinghua He, Ying Wang, Zhong Lin, Qingdong Cao, Hongjun Jin, Hong Shan
{"title":"Application of Dynamic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT for Distinguishing Intrapulmonary Metastases from Synchronous Multiple Primary Lung Cancer.","authors":"Weize Lv, Min Yang, Hongcheng Zhong, Xiaojin Wang, Shuai Yang, Lei Bi, Jianzhong Xian, Xiaofeng Pei, Xinghua He, Ying Wang, Zhong Lin, Qingdong Cao, Hongjun Jin, Hong Shan","doi":"10.1155/2022/8081299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has been a big challenge to distinguish synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (sMPLC) from primary lung cancer with intrapulmonary metastases (IPM). We aimed to assess the clinical application of dynamic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in patients with multiple lung cancer nodules. We enrolled patients with multiple pulmonary nodules who had undergone dynamic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and divided them into sMPLC and IPM groups based on comprehensive features. The SUV<sub>max</sub>, fitted <i>K</i> <sub><i>i</i></sub> value based on dynamic scanning, and corresponding maximum diameter (<i>D</i> <sub>max</sub>) from the two largest tumors were determined in each patient. We determined the absolute between-tumor difference of SUV<sub>max</sub>/<i>D</i> <sub>max</sub> and <i>K</i> <sub><i>i</i></sub> /<i>D</i> <sub>max</sub> (ΔSUV<sub>max</sub>/<i>D</i> <sub>max</sub>; Δ<i>K</i> <sub><i>i</i></sub> /<i>D</i> <sub>max</sub>) and assessed the between-group differences. Further, the diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by ROC analysis and the correlation between ΔSUV<sub>max</sub>/<i>D</i> <sub>max</sub> and Δ<i>K</i> <sub><i>i</i></sub> /D<sub>max</sub> from all groups was determined. There was no significant difference for ΔSUV<sub>max</sub>/<i>D</i> <sub>max</sub> between the IPM and sMPLC groups, while the IPM group had a significantly higher Δ<i>K</i> <sub><i>i</i></sub> /D<sub>max</sub> than the sMPLC group. The AUC of Δ<i>K</i> <sub><i>i</i></sub> /<i>D</i> <sub>max</sub> for differentiating sMPLC from IPM was 0.80 (cut-off value of <i>K</i> <sub><i>i</i></sub> = 0.0059, sensitivity 79%, specificity 75%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was a good correlation (Pearson <i>r</i> = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.79-0.96, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) between ΔSUV<sub>max</sub>/<i>D</i> <sub>max</sub> and Δ<i>K</i> <sub><i>i</i></sub> /<i>D</i> <sub>max</sub> in the IPM group but not in the sMPLC group (Pearson <i>r</i> = 0.45, <i>p</i> > 0.05). Dynamic <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT could be a useful tool for distinguishing sMPLC from IPM. <i>K</i> <sub><i>i</i></sub> calculation based on Patlak graphic analysis could be more sensitive than SUV<sub>max</sub> in discriminating IPM from sMPLC in patients with multiple lung cancer nodules.</p>","PeriodicalId":18855,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9281433/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8081299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
It has been a big challenge to distinguish synchronous multiple primary lung cancer (sMPLC) from primary lung cancer with intrapulmonary metastases (IPM). We aimed to assess the clinical application of dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with multiple lung cancer nodules. We enrolled patients with multiple pulmonary nodules who had undergone dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT and divided them into sMPLC and IPM groups based on comprehensive features. The SUVmax, fitted Ki value based on dynamic scanning, and corresponding maximum diameter (Dmax) from the two largest tumors were determined in each patient. We determined the absolute between-tumor difference of SUVmax/Dmax and Ki /Dmax (ΔSUVmax/Dmax; ΔKi /Dmax) and assessed the between-group differences. Further, the diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by ROC analysis and the correlation between ΔSUVmax/Dmax and ΔKi /Dmax from all groups was determined. There was no significant difference for ΔSUVmax/Dmax between the IPM and sMPLC groups, while the IPM group had a significantly higher ΔKi /Dmax than the sMPLC group. The AUC of ΔKi /Dmax for differentiating sMPLC from IPM was 0.80 (cut-off value of Ki = 0.0059, sensitivity 79%, specificity 75%, p < 0.001). There was a good correlation (Pearson r = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.79-0.96, p < 0.0001) between ΔSUVmax/Dmax and ΔKi /Dmax in the IPM group but not in the sMPLC group (Pearson r = 0.45, p > 0.05). Dynamic 18F-FDG PET/CT could be a useful tool for distinguishing sMPLC from IPM. Ki calculation based on Patlak graphic analysis could be more sensitive than SUVmax in discriminating IPM from sMPLC in patients with multiple lung cancer nodules.
Molecular ImagingBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
自引率
3.60%
发文量
21
期刊介绍:
Molecular Imaging is a peer-reviewed, open access journal highlighting the breadth of molecular imaging research from basic science to preclinical studies to human applications. This serves both the scientific and clinical communities by disseminating novel results and concepts relevant to the biological study of normal and disease processes in both basic and translational studies ranging from mice to humans.