Critical realism methodology as a guiding framework for interdisciplinary theory enrichment: Reflections on a study of empowerment

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Erin Rose Ellison, Regina Day Langhout
{"title":"Critical realism methodology as a guiding framework for interdisciplinary theory enrichment: Reflections on a study of empowerment","authors":"Erin Rose Ellison,&nbsp;Regina Day Langhout","doi":"10.1002/jcop.22919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Philosophy of science and ontological assumptions underpin our work as scholars, explicitly, or implicitly. In this paper, we develop empowerment theory with a critical realism (CR) lens. Through the example of a study of empowerment, we examine how can it be used as a guiding paradigm for research in community psychology (CP). We sought to increase theoretical rigor by using a CR approach to interdisciplinarity. We put empowerment into conversation with Social Reproduction Theory and Black, Indigenous, People of Color feminisms, because both represent situated knowledge that address experiences with oppression and focus on dismantling systems of oppression. We illustrate how a CR approach shaped our understanding of empowerment, and in turn, provided an analysis that was (a) more nuanced and actionable, (b) more aligned with CP values and definitions of social justice, and (c) more likely to contribute to the field by developing an intersectional anticapitalist and feminist intervention into empowerment literature. This paper highlights how, aligned with an interdisciplinary CR approach, we questioned assumptions about empowerment theory, which influenced our empirical work so that we could provide a more focused critique of unjust social arrangements, and with it, the possibility to act upon those arrangements.</p>","PeriodicalId":15496,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community psychology","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcop.22919","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Philosophy of science and ontological assumptions underpin our work as scholars, explicitly, or implicitly. In this paper, we develop empowerment theory with a critical realism (CR) lens. Through the example of a study of empowerment, we examine how can it be used as a guiding paradigm for research in community psychology (CP). We sought to increase theoretical rigor by using a CR approach to interdisciplinarity. We put empowerment into conversation with Social Reproduction Theory and Black, Indigenous, People of Color feminisms, because both represent situated knowledge that address experiences with oppression and focus on dismantling systems of oppression. We illustrate how a CR approach shaped our understanding of empowerment, and in turn, provided an analysis that was (a) more nuanced and actionable, (b) more aligned with CP values and definitions of social justice, and (c) more likely to contribute to the field by developing an intersectional anticapitalist and feminist intervention into empowerment literature. This paper highlights how, aligned with an interdisciplinary CR approach, we questioned assumptions about empowerment theory, which influenced our empirical work so that we could provide a more focused critique of unjust social arrangements, and with it, the possibility to act upon those arrangements.

将批判现实主义方法论作为丰富跨学科理论的指导框架:对赋权研究的思考。
科学哲学和本体论假设或明或暗地支撑着我们作为学者的工作。在本文中,我们以批判现实主义(CR)的视角发展赋权理论。通过赋权研究的例子,我们探讨了如何将其作为社区心理学(CP)研究的指导范式。我们试图通过使用跨学科的批判现实主义方法来提高理论的严谨性。我们将赋权与社会再生产理论以及黑人、土著、有色人种女权主义进行了对话,因为这两种理论都代表了解决受压迫经历的情景知识,并侧重于瓦解压迫系统。我们说明了 CR 方法如何塑造了我们对赋权的理解,并反过来提供了以下分析:(a)更细致入微、更具可操作性;(b)更符合 CP 价值观和社会正义的定义;(c)更有可能通过对赋权文献进行反资本主义和女权主义的交叉干预,为该领域做出贡献。本文重点介绍了我们如何根据跨学科的 CR 方法,对赋权理论的假设提出质疑,这些假设对我们的实证工作产生了影响,从而使我们能够对不公正的社会安排提出更有针对性的批评,并有可能对这些安排采取行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
195
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Psychology is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to research, evaluation, assessment and intervention, and review articles that deal with human behavior in community settings. Articles of interest include descriptions and evaluations of service programs and projects, studies of youth, parenting, and family development, methodology and design for work in the community, the interaction of groups in the larger community, and criminals and corrections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信