I. INTRODUCTION: UNDERSTANDING MEDICINES AND MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS.

IF 9.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Kristi L Lockhart, Frank C Keil
{"title":"I. INTRODUCTION: UNDERSTANDING MEDICINES AND MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS.","authors":"Kristi L Lockhart, Frank C Keil","doi":"10.1111/mono.12361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We live in an increasingly pharmacological and medical world, where children and adults frequently encounter alleged treatments for an enormous range of illnesses. How do we come to understand what heals and why? Here, 15 studies explore how 1,414 children (ages 5-11) and 882 adults construe the efficacies of different kinds of cures. Developmental patterns in folk physics, psychology, and biology lead to predictions about which expectations about cures will remain relatively constant across development and which will change. With respect to stability, we find that even young school children (ages 5-7) distinguish between physical and psychological disorders and the treatments most effective for each. In contrast, young children reason differently about temporal properties associated with cures. They often judge that dramatic departures from prescribed schedules will continue to be effective. Young children are also less likely than older ages to differentiate between the treatment needs of acute versus chronic disorders. Young children see medicines as agent-like entities that migrate only to afflicted regions while having \"cure-all\" properties, views that help explain their difficulties grasping side effects. They also differ from older children and adults by judging pain and effort as reducing, instead of enhancing, a treatment's power. Finally, across all studies, optimism about treatment efficacy declines with age. Taken together, these studies show major developmental changes in how children envision the ways medicines work in the body. Moreover, these findings link to broader patterns in cognitive development and have implications for how medicines should be explained to children.</p>","PeriodicalId":55972,"journal":{"name":"Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development","volume":"83 2","pages":"7-32"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/mono.12361","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12361","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

We live in an increasingly pharmacological and medical world, where children and adults frequently encounter alleged treatments for an enormous range of illnesses. How do we come to understand what heals and why? Here, 15 studies explore how 1,414 children (ages 5-11) and 882 adults construe the efficacies of different kinds of cures. Developmental patterns in folk physics, psychology, and biology lead to predictions about which expectations about cures will remain relatively constant across development and which will change. With respect to stability, we find that even young school children (ages 5-7) distinguish between physical and psychological disorders and the treatments most effective for each. In contrast, young children reason differently about temporal properties associated with cures. They often judge that dramatic departures from prescribed schedules will continue to be effective. Young children are also less likely than older ages to differentiate between the treatment needs of acute versus chronic disorders. Young children see medicines as agent-like entities that migrate only to afflicted regions while having "cure-all" properties, views that help explain their difficulties grasping side effects. They also differ from older children and adults by judging pain and effort as reducing, instead of enhancing, a treatment's power. Finally, across all studies, optimism about treatment efficacy declines with age. Taken together, these studies show major developmental changes in how children envision the ways medicines work in the body. Moreover, these findings link to broader patterns in cognitive development and have implications for how medicines should be explained to children.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

1 .导论:了解药物和医疗干预措施。
我们生活在一个药理学和医学日益发达的世界,儿童和成人经常遇到各种各样的疾病的所谓治疗方法。我们如何理解什么能治愈,为什么能治愈?在这里,15项研究探讨了1414名儿童(5-11岁)和882名成年人如何理解不同类型治疗的疗效。民间物理学、心理学和生物学的发展模式可以预测,在整个发展过程中,哪些对治疗的期望会保持相对不变,哪些会发生变化。在稳定性方面,我们发现即使是年幼的学龄儿童(5-7岁)也能区分生理和心理障碍以及对每种疾病最有效的治疗方法。相比之下,幼儿对与治疗相关的时间属性的推理不同。他们经常判断,戏剧性地偏离规定的时间表将继续有效。与老年人相比,幼儿也不太可能区分急性和慢性疾病的治疗需求。幼儿将药物视为一种代理实体,虽然具有“包治百病”的特性,但只会转移到患病区域,这种观点有助于解释他们难以掌握副作用的原因。他们也不同于年龄较大的儿童和成人,他们认为疼痛和努力会降低而不是增强治疗的效果。最后,在所有研究中,对治疗效果的乐观态度随着年龄的增长而下降。综上所述,这些研究表明,儿童对药物在体内起作用的方式的看法发生了重大的发展变化。此外,这些发现与认知发展的更广泛模式有关,并对如何向儿童解释药物具有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Since 1935, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development has been a platform for presenting in-depth research studies and significant findings in child development and related disciplines. Each issue features a single study or a collection of papers on a unified theme, often complemented by commentary and discussion. In alignment with all Society for Research in Child Development (SRCD) publications, the Monographs facilitate the exchange of data, techniques, research methods, and conclusions among development specialists across diverse disciplines. Subscribing to the Monographs series also includes a full subscription (6 issues) to Child Development, the flagship journal of the SRCD, and Child Development Perspectives, the newest journal from the SRCD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信