Management of pharyngeal collapse in patients affected by moderate obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.

Francesco Lorusso, Francesco Dispenza, Federico Sireci, Angelo Immordino, Palmira Immordino, Salvatore Gallina
{"title":"Management of pharyngeal collapse in patients affected by moderate obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.","authors":"Francesco Lorusso,&nbsp;Francesco Dispenza,&nbsp;Federico Sireci,&nbsp;Angelo Immordino,&nbsp;Palmira Immordino,&nbsp;Salvatore Gallina","doi":"10.14639/0392-100X-N1871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study reports our experience in a selected cohort of patients affected by mild-moderate OSAS, without tonsillar obstruction, and treated with pharyngoplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a case-control retrospective study, we compared modified expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (MESP) to modified barbed reposition pharyngoplasty (MBRP) in adult patients with oropharyngeal transversal collapse with a BMI ≤ 30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and mild-moderate obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS). A clinical evaluation, including collection of anthropometric data and sleep endoscopy, was performed. Six months after surgery, symptoms recording, clinical evaluation and polysomnography (PSG) were repeated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 20 patients: 10 treated with MESP and 10 treated with MBRP. Mean apnoea-hypoapnoea index (AHI) was 22.8 (± 5.63). We observed in both groups a significant reduction of AHI and oropharyngeal obstruction (p = 0.01), with a success rate, according with Sher's criteria, of 90% for MESP and 80% for MBRP, respectively. Post-surgical pain and snoring reduction were significantly lower with MBRP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We recorded similar success rates for both techniques. MBRP may be considered better than MESP due to less surgical time, no potential mucosal damage, absence of knots, and faster recovery with less pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":520544,"journal":{"name":"Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale","volume":" ","pages":"273-280"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/68/17/aoi-2022-03-273.PMC9330758.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14639/0392-100X-N1871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: This study reports our experience in a selected cohort of patients affected by mild-moderate OSAS, without tonsillar obstruction, and treated with pharyngoplasty.

Methods: In a case-control retrospective study, we compared modified expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (MESP) to modified barbed reposition pharyngoplasty (MBRP) in adult patients with oropharyngeal transversal collapse with a BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2, and mild-moderate obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS). A clinical evaluation, including collection of anthropometric data and sleep endoscopy, was performed. Six months after surgery, symptoms recording, clinical evaluation and polysomnography (PSG) were repeated.

Results: We enrolled 20 patients: 10 treated with MESP and 10 treated with MBRP. Mean apnoea-hypoapnoea index (AHI) was 22.8 (± 5.63). We observed in both groups a significant reduction of AHI and oropharyngeal obstruction (p = 0.01), with a success rate, according with Sher's criteria, of 90% for MESP and 80% for MBRP, respectively. Post-surgical pain and snoring reduction were significantly lower with MBRP.

Conclusions: We recorded similar success rates for both techniques. MBRP may be considered better than MESP due to less surgical time, no potential mucosal damage, absence of knots, and faster recovery with less pain.

Abstract Image

中度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者咽萎的处理。
目的:本研究报告了我们选择的一组无扁桃体阻塞的轻中度OSAS患者的经验,并进行了咽成形术治疗。方法:在一项病例对照回顾性研究中,我们比较了改良扩张括约肌咽成形术(MESP)和改良倒刺复位咽成形术(MBRP)对BMI≤30 kg/m2、轻度至中度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)的口咽横断塌陷成年患者的治疗效果。进行临床评估,包括收集人体测量数据和睡眠内窥镜检查。术后6个月复查症状记录、临床评价及多导睡眠图(PSG)。结果:我们纳入了20例患者:10例采用MESP治疗,10例采用MBRP治疗。平均呼吸暂停-呼吸不足指数(AHI) 22.8(±5.63)。我们观察到两组患者AHI和口咽梗阻均显著降低(p = 0.01),根据Sher标准,MESP和MBRP的成功率分别为90%和80%。术后疼痛和打鼾减少明显低于MBRP。结论:我们记录了两种技术相似的成功率。MBRP可能被认为比MESP更好,因为手术时间更短,没有潜在的粘膜损伤,没有结,恢复更快,疼痛更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信