Guiulfo Mamani-Mango, Milagros Moina Gonzales, Martín Ramos Hidalgo, José Mendoza Mallma, Jaime Ruiz Béjar, Victoria Rivas Palma, Edwin Mellisho Salas
{"title":"Effect of Extender and Freezing Rate on Quality Parameters and In Vitro Fertilization Capacity of Alpaca Spermatozoa Recovered from Cauda Epididymis.","authors":"Guiulfo Mamani-Mango, Milagros Moina Gonzales, Martín Ramos Hidalgo, José Mendoza Mallma, Jaime Ruiz Béjar, Victoria Rivas Palma, Edwin Mellisho Salas","doi":"10.1089/bio.2018.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In alpacas, improvement of reproductive efficiency of male camelids is limited by the small testicular size, low spermatozoa production, and low quality of semen. In this study we aim to evaluate the effect of two extenders and two freezing rates on post-thaw quality of sperm recovered from alpaca epididymis with two methods (flushing and mincing), and to evaluate the in vitro fertilization (IVF) capacity of frozen sperm selected with two different selection methods (washing and swim-up). Sperm samples were processed with Tris-egg yolk or Bioxcell<sup>®</sup> extenders and frozen with slow freezing and fast freezing. The oocytes were coincubated with spermatozoa for 72 hours, and cleavage rates were recorded afterward. The results indicated that the recovery method did not influence sperm quality (∼70%). However, total sperm recovery was significantly lower for the flushing method than the mincing method. The sperm quality was influenced by the freezing extender (23.3% vs. 33.2%) and freezing rate (20.9% vs. 35.7%). When comparing different methods of sperm selection for IVF, no differences were observed on cleavage rate except for the fact that the concentration of sperm from swim-up method (20.6%) was significantly lower than the one obtained from the washing method (78.7%). The recovery technique of sperm does not affect sperm quality and the method of fast freezing was shown to be the most effective for cryopreservation of alpaca sperm.</p>","PeriodicalId":49231,"journal":{"name":"Biopreservation and Biobanking","volume":" ","pages":"39-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/bio.2018.0021","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biopreservation and Biobanking","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2018.0021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
Abstract
In alpacas, improvement of reproductive efficiency of male camelids is limited by the small testicular size, low spermatozoa production, and low quality of semen. In this study we aim to evaluate the effect of two extenders and two freezing rates on post-thaw quality of sperm recovered from alpaca epididymis with two methods (flushing and mincing), and to evaluate the in vitro fertilization (IVF) capacity of frozen sperm selected with two different selection methods (washing and swim-up). Sperm samples were processed with Tris-egg yolk or Bioxcell® extenders and frozen with slow freezing and fast freezing. The oocytes were coincubated with spermatozoa for 72 hours, and cleavage rates were recorded afterward. The results indicated that the recovery method did not influence sperm quality (∼70%). However, total sperm recovery was significantly lower for the flushing method than the mincing method. The sperm quality was influenced by the freezing extender (23.3% vs. 33.2%) and freezing rate (20.9% vs. 35.7%). When comparing different methods of sperm selection for IVF, no differences were observed on cleavage rate except for the fact that the concentration of sperm from swim-up method (20.6%) was significantly lower than the one obtained from the washing method (78.7%). The recovery technique of sperm does not affect sperm quality and the method of fast freezing was shown to be the most effective for cryopreservation of alpaca sperm.
在羊驼中,雄性骆驼的生殖效率的提高受到睾丸尺寸小、精子产量低和精液质量低的限制。本研究旨在评价两种延长剂和两种冷冻速率对两种方法(冲洗和粉碎)羊驼附睾精子解冻后质量的影响,并评价两种不同选择方法(冲洗和浮起)选择的冷冻精子的体外受精能力。精子样品用tris -卵黄或Bioxcell®填充剂处理,用慢速冷冻和快速冷冻进行冷冻。卵母细胞与精子共孵育72小时,随后记录卵裂率。结果表明,恢复方法对精子质量没有影响(约70%)。然而,冲洗法的总精子回收率明显低于切碎法。精子质量受冷冻剂(23.3% vs. 33.2%)和冷冻率(20.9% vs. 35.7%)的影响。在比较不同的试管婴儿精子选择方法时,除了游起法的精子浓度(20.6%)显著低于洗涤法的精子浓度(78.7%)外,在卵裂率上没有差异。精子恢复技术不影响精子质量,快速冷冻法是保存羊驼精子最有效的方法。
期刊介绍:
Biopreservation and Biobanking is the first journal to provide a unifying forum for the peer-reviewed communication of recent advances in the emerging and evolving field of biospecimen procurement, processing, preservation and banking, distribution, and use. The Journal publishes a range of original articles focusing on current challenges and problems in biopreservation, and advances in methods to address these issues related to the processing of macromolecules, cells, and tissues for research.
In a new section dedicated to Emerging Markets and Technologies, the Journal highlights the emergence of new markets and technologies that are either adopting or disrupting the biobank framework as they imprint on society. The solutions presented here are anticipated to help drive innovation within the biobank community.
Biopreservation and Biobanking also explores the ethical, legal, and societal considerations surrounding biobanking and biorepository operation. Ideas and practical solutions relevant to improved quality, efficiency, and sustainability of repositories, and relating to their management, operation and oversight are discussed as well.