Predictors of Mental Health among the General Population of U.S. Adults Eight Months into the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Psychology (Irvine, Calif.) Pub Date : 2022-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-30 DOI:10.4236/psych.2022.133029
Elizabeth Flanagan Balawajder, Bruce G Taylor, Phoebe A Lamuda, Kai MacLean, Harold A Pollack, John A Schneider
{"title":"Predictors of Mental Health among the General Population of U.S. Adults Eight Months into the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Elizabeth Flanagan Balawajder,&nbsp;Bruce G Taylor,&nbsp;Phoebe A Lamuda,&nbsp;Kai MacLean,&nbsp;Harold A Pollack,&nbsp;John A Schneider","doi":"10.4236/psych.2022.133029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has had profound impacts on mental health. We examined whether mental health differed based on sociodemographic and background characteristics, political party affiliation, and concerns about COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, national sample of 1095 U.S. adults were surveyed October 22-26, 2020. The survey collected information on demographics, risk and protective behaviors for COVID-19, and mental health using the Mental Health Inventory-5 (MHI-5) scale. Independent samples t-tests, one-way Analysis of Variance tests, and a multivariable linear regression model were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regression results showed respondents with criminal justice (B = -6.56, 95% CI = -10.05, -3.06) or opioid misuse (B = -9.98, 95% CI = -14.74, -5.23) histories reported poorer mental health than those without. Those who took protective behaviors (e.g., wearing masks) reported poorer mental health compared to those who indicated protective behaviors were unnecessary (B = 7.00, 95% CI = 1.61, 12.38) while those who took at least one risk behavior (e.g., eating in a restaurant) reported better mental health than those who did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study shows that certain groups have experienced poorer mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting that mental health should continue to be monitored so that public health interventions and messaging help prevent the spread of COVID-19 without increasing poor mental health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":89844,"journal":{"name":"Psychology (Irvine, Calif.)","volume":"13 3","pages":"427-442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9306300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology (Irvine, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2022.133029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has had profound impacts on mental health. We examined whether mental health differed based on sociodemographic and background characteristics, political party affiliation, and concerns about COVID-19.

Methods: A cross-sectional, national sample of 1095 U.S. adults were surveyed October 22-26, 2020. The survey collected information on demographics, risk and protective behaviors for COVID-19, and mental health using the Mental Health Inventory-5 (MHI-5) scale. Independent samples t-tests, one-way Analysis of Variance tests, and a multivariable linear regression model were conducted.

Results: Regression results showed respondents with criminal justice (B = -6.56, 95% CI = -10.05, -3.06) or opioid misuse (B = -9.98, 95% CI = -14.74, -5.23) histories reported poorer mental health than those without. Those who took protective behaviors (e.g., wearing masks) reported poorer mental health compared to those who indicated protective behaviors were unnecessary (B = 7.00, 95% CI = 1.61, 12.38) while those who took at least one risk behavior (e.g., eating in a restaurant) reported better mental health than those who did not.

Conclusions: Our study shows that certain groups have experienced poorer mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic, suggesting that mental health should continue to be monitored so that public health interventions and messaging help prevent the spread of COVID-19 without increasing poor mental health outcomes.

COVID-19大流行八个月后美国普通人群心理健康的预测因素
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行对心理健康产生了深远影响。我们研究了心理健康是否因社会人口统计学和背景特征、政党关系以及对COVID-19的担忧而有所不同。方法:于2020年10月22日至26日对1095名美国成年人进行横断面全国抽样调查。该调查使用心理健康清单-5 (MHI-5)量表收集了有关COVID-19的人口统计、风险和保护行为以及心理健康的信息。进行了独立样本t检验、单向方差分析检验和多变量线性回归模型。结果:回归结果显示,有刑事司法史(B = -6.56, 95% CI = -10.05, -3.06)或阿片类药物滥用史(B = -9.98, 95% CI = -14.74, -5.23)的受访者心理健康状况较无刑事司法史的受访者差。那些采取保护行为(例如,戴口罩)的人报告的心理健康状况比那些认为没有必要采取保护行为的人差(B = 7.00, 95% CI = 1.61, 12.38),而那些至少采取一种风险行为(例如,在餐馆吃饭)的人报告的心理健康状况比那些没有采取保护行为的人好。结论:我们的研究表明,在COVID-19大流行期间,某些人群的心理健康状况较差,这表明应继续监测心理健康状况,以便公共卫生干预措施和信息传递有助于预防COVID-19的传播,而不会增加不良的心理健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信