Exploring the use of activity-based group therapy in increasing self-efficacy and subjective well-being in acute mental health.

Bi Xia Ngooi, Su Ren Wong, Janice Dehui Chen, Vanessa Shi Yin Koh
{"title":"Exploring the use of activity-based group therapy in increasing self-efficacy and subjective well-being in acute mental health.","authors":"Bi Xia Ngooi,&nbsp;Su Ren Wong,&nbsp;Janice Dehui Chen,&nbsp;Vanessa Shi Yin Koh","doi":"10.1177/15691861221075798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Self-efficacy is a key component in mental health recovery and improvement in well-being. Mental illness is often resultant of environmental stressors, highlighting the importance of coping skills. Occupational therapists commonly utilise activity-based group therapy to encourage use of activities as coping strategies. However, there has been little research concerning these groups and their role in enhancing self-efficacy in behavioural-based coping skills. This study aimed to explore factors that affect behavioural-based coping self-efficacy during activity-based group therapy in an acute mental health ward. It investigates the relationships between (1) behavioural-based coping self-efficacy with overall mental health self-efficacy and (2) mental health self-efficacy and subjective well-being.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Immediately after the first group, participants completed a post-group questionnaire. Participation level was also rated. At discharge, the participants were asked to complete the UK Office of National Statistics subjective well-being tool and the Mental Health Self-Efficacy Scale. Descriptive statistics, independent sample t-tests and one-way analysis of variance were done to examine possible covariates and confounders of all outcome variables. General linear models were then conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-group questionnaire reflected moderate-high self-efficacy (M = 6.92, SD = 2.48) and positive well-being with higher happiness scores (M = 7.42, SD = 2.20) and lower anxiety scores (M = 3.79, SD = 2.85). Coping self-efficacy significantly predicted overall mental health self-efficacy (<i>p</i> = .014), which in turn significantly predicted positive domains of well-being.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Performing behavioural-based coping strategies in groups can enhance coping self-efficacy and positive well-being, with possible positive influence on mental health self-efficacy and well-being at discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":73249,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT","volume":"35 1","pages":"52-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/64/af/10.1177_15691861221075798.PMC9279881.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong journal of occupational therapy : HKJOT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15691861221075798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background/objectives: Self-efficacy is a key component in mental health recovery and improvement in well-being. Mental illness is often resultant of environmental stressors, highlighting the importance of coping skills. Occupational therapists commonly utilise activity-based group therapy to encourage use of activities as coping strategies. However, there has been little research concerning these groups and their role in enhancing self-efficacy in behavioural-based coping skills. This study aimed to explore factors that affect behavioural-based coping self-efficacy during activity-based group therapy in an acute mental health ward. It investigates the relationships between (1) behavioural-based coping self-efficacy with overall mental health self-efficacy and (2) mental health self-efficacy and subjective well-being.

Methods: Immediately after the first group, participants completed a post-group questionnaire. Participation level was also rated. At discharge, the participants were asked to complete the UK Office of National Statistics subjective well-being tool and the Mental Health Self-Efficacy Scale. Descriptive statistics, independent sample t-tests and one-way analysis of variance were done to examine possible covariates and confounders of all outcome variables. General linear models were then conducted.

Results: Post-group questionnaire reflected moderate-high self-efficacy (M = 6.92, SD = 2.48) and positive well-being with higher happiness scores (M = 7.42, SD = 2.20) and lower anxiety scores (M = 3.79, SD = 2.85). Coping self-efficacy significantly predicted overall mental health self-efficacy (p = .014), which in turn significantly predicted positive domains of well-being.

Conclusions: Performing behavioural-based coping strategies in groups can enhance coping self-efficacy and positive well-being, with possible positive influence on mental health self-efficacy and well-being at discharge.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

探索以活动为基础的团体治疗在急性心理健康中提高自我效能感和主观幸福感的应用。
背景/目的:自我效能感是心理健康恢复和幸福感改善的关键组成部分。精神疾病通常是由环境压力因素造成的,这凸显了应对技能的重要性。职业治疗师通常使用以活动为基础的团体治疗来鼓励使用活动作为应对策略。然而,关于这些群体及其在提高基于行为的应对技能的自我效能方面的作用的研究很少。本研究旨在探讨急性心理健康病房活动团体治疗中影响行为应对自我效能的因素。研究了(1)基于行为的应对自我效能与整体心理健康自我效能的关系;(2)心理健康自我效能与主观幸福感的关系。方法:第一组结束后,参与者立即完成一份组后问卷。参与程度也被评估。出院时,参与者被要求完成英国国家统计局主观幸福感工具和心理健康自我效能量表。采用描述性统计、独立样本t检验和单向方差分析来检验所有结果变量可能的协变量和混杂因素。然后进行一般线性模型。结果:组后问卷反映中-高自我效能感(M = 6.92, SD = 2.48)和积极幸福感,其中快乐得分较高(M = 7.42, SD = 2.20),焦虑得分较低(M = 3.79, SD = 2.85)。应对自我效能显著预测整体心理健康自我效能(p = 0.014),而整体心理健康自我效能又显著预测幸福感的积极领域。结论:在群体中实施基于行为的应对策略可以提高应对自我效能感和积极幸福感,并可能对心理健康自我效能感和出院幸福感产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信