Comparison of physical and mechanical properties of three different restorative materials in primary teeth: an in vitro study.

B Keskus, F Oznurhan
{"title":"Comparison of physical and mechanical properties of three different restorative materials in primary teeth: an in vitro study.","authors":"B Keskus,&nbsp;F Oznurhan","doi":"10.1007/s40368-022-00734-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Physical and mechanical properties of three different (Ketac Molar Easymix, Dyract XP, Cention N (CN)) restoratives with different ingredients were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four groups were obtained; Group 1: CN LightCure, Group 2: CN SelfCure, Group 3: Ketac Molar Easymix and Group 4: Dyract XP. Disk-shaped samples (n = 10) were prepared and evaluated for the surface roughness test using a profilometer. For the flexure strength test, 2 × 2 × 25 mm bar-shaped samples (n = 10) were prepared, and a three-point bending test was applied to the samples. After preparing cavities for microleakage tests, teeth were restored with restoratives, immersed in dye, and microleakage was assessed. For the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) test, ten sticks were obtained for each group and were stressed under tension.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to surface roughness tests, CN SelfCure showed the lowest value (0.13 μm), while Ketac Molar Easymix showed the highest value (0.28 μm), and significant differences were found between the groups. In flexural strength tests, the highest values were seen in CN SelfCure (82.94 MPa), with statistically significant differences between the groups. When CN SelfCure was applied with an adhesive, the teeth showed statistically decreased leakage than other groups on the gingival side. Higher leakage values were seen on the gingival side than the occlusal side in most groups, and the SelfCure groups showed decreased leakage than the LightCure groups. According to µTBS tests, the highest value was obtained in CN SelfCure-Adhesive group, while the lowest was in CN LightCure-Non-adhesive group. When µTBS was evaluated regardless of adhesive use, the SelfCure groups showed higher µTBS values than the LightCure groups. As a result of the µTBS and microleakage test, the difference between the use of CN with and without adhesive, regardless of the polymerization type, was found to be significant (p  < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cention N showed better properties in SelfCure mode, compared to the rest materials tested, but further in vitro and in vivo studies are needed to investigate the effect of different polymerization modes and the oral environmental conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":520615,"journal":{"name":"European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"821-828"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-022-00734-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: Physical and mechanical properties of three different (Ketac Molar Easymix, Dyract XP, Cention N (CN)) restoratives with different ingredients were evaluated.

Materials and methods: Four groups were obtained; Group 1: CN LightCure, Group 2: CN SelfCure, Group 3: Ketac Molar Easymix and Group 4: Dyract XP. Disk-shaped samples (n = 10) were prepared and evaluated for the surface roughness test using a profilometer. For the flexure strength test, 2 × 2 × 25 mm bar-shaped samples (n = 10) were prepared, and a three-point bending test was applied to the samples. After preparing cavities for microleakage tests, teeth were restored with restoratives, immersed in dye, and microleakage was assessed. For the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) test, ten sticks were obtained for each group and were stressed under tension.

Results: According to surface roughness tests, CN SelfCure showed the lowest value (0.13 μm), while Ketac Molar Easymix showed the highest value (0.28 μm), and significant differences were found between the groups. In flexural strength tests, the highest values were seen in CN SelfCure (82.94 MPa), with statistically significant differences between the groups. When CN SelfCure was applied with an adhesive, the teeth showed statistically decreased leakage than other groups on the gingival side. Higher leakage values were seen on the gingival side than the occlusal side in most groups, and the SelfCure groups showed decreased leakage than the LightCure groups. According to µTBS tests, the highest value was obtained in CN SelfCure-Adhesive group, while the lowest was in CN LightCure-Non-adhesive group. When µTBS was evaluated regardless of adhesive use, the SelfCure groups showed higher µTBS values than the LightCure groups. As a result of the µTBS and microleakage test, the difference between the use of CN with and without adhesive, regardless of the polymerization type, was found to be significant (p  < 0.05).

Conclusion: Cention N showed better properties in SelfCure mode, compared to the rest materials tested, but further in vitro and in vivo studies are needed to investigate the effect of different polymerization modes and the oral environmental conditions.

三种不同的乳牙修复材料的物理力学性能比较:一项体外研究。
目的:评价三种不同成分(Ketac Molar Easymix、Dyract XP、Cention N (CN))修复体的物理力学性能。材料和方法:分为四组;第1组:CN LightCure,第2组:CN SelfCure,第3组:Ketac Molar Easymix,第4组:Dyract XP。制备盘状样品(n = 10),并使用轮廓仪评估表面粗糙度测试。进行抗弯强度试验时,制备2 × 2 × 25 mm棒状试样(n = 10),并对试样进行三点弯曲试验。在准备好进行微渗漏试验的空腔后,用修复体修复牙齿,浸泡在染料中,并评估微渗漏。微拉伸粘结强度(µTBS)测试,每组取10根棒材,进行拉伸应力测试。结果:在表面粗糙度测试中,CN SelfCure的最小值为0.13 μm, Ketac Molar Easymix的最大值为0.28 μm,两组间存在显著性差异。在抗折强度试验中,CN SelfCure的抗折强度最高(82.94 MPa),组间差异有统计学意义。当CN SelfCure应用粘合剂时,牙齿在牙龈侧的渗漏比其他组明显减少。大多数组牙龈侧渗漏值高于咬合侧,SelfCure组渗漏值低于LightCure组。µTBS测试结果显示,CN SelfCure-Adhesive组最高,CN LightCure-Non-adhesive组最低。无论使用何种粘合剂,当评估µTBS时,SelfCure组的µTBS值高于LightCure组。通过µTBS和微泄漏试验,发现无论聚合方式如何,CN带胶和不带胶的使用差异都是显著的(p结论:与其他测试材料相比,Cention N在SelfCure模式下表现出更好的性能,但需要进一步的体外和体内研究来研究不同聚合模式和口腔环境条件的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信