[Evaluation of the public-health intervention "Healthy Lower Rhine...against Stroke" by means of clinic data in the district of Wesel, Germany. Comparative study with clinic data samples in 2003 and in 2005].

Rüdiger Rau, Kirsten Otten, Jutta Genz, Max Geraedts
{"title":"[Evaluation of the public-health intervention \"Healthy Lower Rhine...against Stroke\" by means of clinic data in the district of Wesel, Germany. Comparative study with clinic data samples in 2003 and in 2005].","authors":"Rüdiger Rau,&nbsp;Kirsten Otten,&nbsp;Jutta Genz,&nbsp;Max Geraedts","doi":"10.1007/s00063-008-1002-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The initiative \"Healthy Lower Rhine ... against Stroke\" aims at improving stroke knowledge in the community, i.e., knowledge of stroke symptoms and proper action when stroke signs occur (call emergency number 112) in order to reduce prehospital times/delay. An expert group in the district of Wesel decided to raise an inventory of stroke-care quality in the whole district. Samples of patient data were drawn in all hospitals in the district of Wesel, in order to gain a database for evaluation of possible effects on prehospital time due to the intervention.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>All hospitals in the Wesel district collected data from patients presenting with stroke signs. Data collection was performed for a time span of 3 months before (T0 in 2003) and during (T1 in 2005) the public-health intervention. Standardized data collection was performed with a short version of the questionnaire issued by the German Stroke Registers Study Group (ADSR). Influential factors on prehospital time and means of transportation were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The portion of patients hospitalized within a <3-h window after onset of stroke symptoms did no vary between 2003 and 2005 (27.3% vs. 27.5%). In 2005, acute care of stroke patients was performed more frequently in the emergency department (33% in 2003 vs. 84% in 2005). Before the start of the stroke intervention, seven clinics collected data on 326 patients, and in 2005, 375 patients were registered by all eight hospitals in the district of Wesel. Mean age of patients rose from 72 to 74 years. The portion of men dropped from 50% to 43%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and perspective: </strong>Obviously, prehospital delay was not reduced after a 2-year run of a stroke campaign. It is recommended to carry out a second survey into community stroke knowledge in the district of Wesel. If a significant trend of improved knowledge should be detected, a new evaluation through clinic data sampling would make sense.</p>","PeriodicalId":18420,"journal":{"name":"Medizinische Klinik","volume":" ","pages":"20-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00063-008-1002-6","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinische Klinik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-008-1002-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Background and purpose: The initiative "Healthy Lower Rhine ... against Stroke" aims at improving stroke knowledge in the community, i.e., knowledge of stroke symptoms and proper action when stroke signs occur (call emergency number 112) in order to reduce prehospital times/delay. An expert group in the district of Wesel decided to raise an inventory of stroke-care quality in the whole district. Samples of patient data were drawn in all hospitals in the district of Wesel, in order to gain a database for evaluation of possible effects on prehospital time due to the intervention.

Material and methods: All hospitals in the Wesel district collected data from patients presenting with stroke signs. Data collection was performed for a time span of 3 months before (T0 in 2003) and during (T1 in 2005) the public-health intervention. Standardized data collection was performed with a short version of the questionnaire issued by the German Stroke Registers Study Group (ADSR). Influential factors on prehospital time and means of transportation were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression.

Results: The portion of patients hospitalized within a <3-h window after onset of stroke symptoms did no vary between 2003 and 2005 (27.3% vs. 27.5%). In 2005, acute care of stroke patients was performed more frequently in the emergency department (33% in 2003 vs. 84% in 2005). Before the start of the stroke intervention, seven clinics collected data on 326 patients, and in 2005, 375 patients were registered by all eight hospitals in the district of Wesel. Mean age of patients rose from 72 to 74 years. The portion of men dropped from 50% to 43%.

Conclusion and perspective: Obviously, prehospital delay was not reduced after a 2-year run of a stroke campaign. It is recommended to carry out a second survey into community stroke knowledge in the district of Wesel. If a significant trend of improved knowledge should be detected, a new evaluation through clinic data sampling would make sense.

公共卫生干预"健康莱茵河下游…"的评价在德国Wesel地区的临床数据进行的研究。与2003年和2005年临床资料样本的比较研究]。
背景和目的:“莱茵河下游健康…"预防中风"旨在提高社区对中风的认识,即了解中风症状并在出现中风迹象时采取适当行动(拨打紧急电话112),以减少院前时间/延误。韦塞尔地区的一个专家组决定提高整个地区中风护理质量的清单。在Wesel区所有医院抽取患者数据样本,以便获得一个数据库,用于评估干预对院前时间可能产生的影响。材料和方法:Wesel地区所有医院收集有脑卒中症状患者的数据。在公共卫生干预之前(2003年1月)和期间(2005年1月)进行了为期3个月的数据收集。标准化的数据收集由德国卒中登记研究小组(ADSR)发布的简短版问卷进行。采用多因素logistic回归分析院前时间和交通方式的影响因素。结果:住院患者的比例在结论和观点:很明显,院前延误并没有减少经过2年的卒中运动。建议在Wesel地区对社区卒中知识进行第二次调查。如果检测到知识的显著改善趋势,通过临床数据抽样进行新的评估将是有意义的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medizinische Klinik
Medizinische Klinik 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信