{"title":"Market entry system considering the biosafety of nanomedical devices in China.","authors":"Hairuo Wen, Ying Yang, Xingchao Geng","doi":"10.1002/wnan.1821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our current knowledge on nanomaterials is mostly built on data from basic studies, and the application and developmental potentials of nanomaterials are emphasized. On the other hand, standard evaluation methods, models, exposure methods, standards, and guidelines for biological effect evaluation are inadequate. In response to the bottlenecks of supervision, scientific research institutes and regulatory organizations in China have cooperated closely to research and establish an evaluation system for nanomedical devices, and silver-containing nanomaterials have been adopted as an example. In such a context, reference materials, characterization strategies, in vitro and in vivo distribution and toxicity evaluation standards have been established. This article highlights research on the risk assessment of nanomedical device products (taking silver-containing nanomedical device products as an example) in China, including the characterization and release determination strategies, determination of nanosilver in tissues, applications of three-dimensional skin models and in vitro and toxicity evaluation standards have been established. This article highlights research on technical standards. As a consequence, the \"Guidelines for the safety and effectiveness evaluation of nanomedical devices\" were published in 2021, and a market entry framework for nanomedical devices has been preliminarily formed as a significant component in scientific supervision. This Guideline supervises the review and supervision of nanomedical devices and, therefore, provides a guarantee for the market access of nanomedical devices in China. This article is categorized under: Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Toxicology of Nanomaterials Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Regulatory and Policy Issues in Nanomedicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":23697,"journal":{"name":"Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology","volume":" ","pages":"e1821"},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wnan.1821","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Our current knowledge on nanomaterials is mostly built on data from basic studies, and the application and developmental potentials of nanomaterials are emphasized. On the other hand, standard evaluation methods, models, exposure methods, standards, and guidelines for biological effect evaluation are inadequate. In response to the bottlenecks of supervision, scientific research institutes and regulatory organizations in China have cooperated closely to research and establish an evaluation system for nanomedical devices, and silver-containing nanomaterials have been adopted as an example. In such a context, reference materials, characterization strategies, in vitro and in vivo distribution and toxicity evaluation standards have been established. This article highlights research on the risk assessment of nanomedical device products (taking silver-containing nanomedical device products as an example) in China, including the characterization and release determination strategies, determination of nanosilver in tissues, applications of three-dimensional skin models and in vitro and toxicity evaluation standards have been established. This article highlights research on technical standards. As a consequence, the "Guidelines for the safety and effectiveness evaluation of nanomedical devices" were published in 2021, and a market entry framework for nanomedical devices has been preliminarily formed as a significant component in scientific supervision. This Guideline supervises the review and supervision of nanomedical devices and, therefore, provides a guarantee for the market access of nanomedical devices in China. This article is categorized under: Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Toxicology of Nanomaterials Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Regulatory and Policy Issues in Nanomedicine.
期刊介绍:
Nanotechnology stands as one of the pivotal scientific domains of the twenty-first century, recognized universally for its transformative potential. Within the biomedical realm, nanotechnology finds crucial applications in nanobiotechnology and nanomedicine, highlighted as one of seven emerging research areas under the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. The advancement of this field hinges upon collaborative efforts across diverse disciplines, including clinicians, biomedical engineers, materials scientists, applied physicists, and toxicologists.
Recognizing the imperative for a high-caliber interdisciplinary review platform, WIREs Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology emerges to fulfill this critical need. Our topical coverage spans a wide spectrum, encompassing areas such as toxicology and regulatory issues, implantable materials and surgical technologies, diagnostic tools, nanotechnology approaches to biology, therapeutic approaches and drug discovery, and biology-inspired nanomaterials. Join us in exploring the frontiers of nanotechnology and its profound impact on biomedical research and healthcare.