Effects of Different Balance Training Volumes on Children's Dynamic Balance.

Sports medicine international open Pub Date : 2022-07-12 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-1811-1145
Simon Schedler, Stella Marie Graf, Thomas Muehlbauer
{"title":"Effects of Different Balance Training Volumes on Children's Dynamic Balance.","authors":"Simon Schedler,&nbsp;Stella Marie Graf,&nbsp;Thomas Muehlbauer","doi":"10.1055/a-1811-1145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Concerning balance training, the most effective design of several load dimensions (e. g., training frequency, volume) is unclear. Thus, we determined the effects of different balance training volumes on dynamic balance in healthy children. Three groups of 20 children (age: 11.0±0.7 years; 47% females) were randomly assigned to a balance training group using a low or a high training volume or an active control group that performed regular physical education lessons. All groups trained for 8 weeks (2 sessions/week), whereby balance training volume amounted to 4 min/session and 18-24 min/session for the low- and high-volume group, respectively. Pre- and post-training, balance performance was assessed using the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test and the Timed-Up-and-Go Test. Fifty-five children completed the study and significant Test x Group interactions were detected for both outcome measures in favor of the two balance training groups. Additionally, improvements in the high-volume group were significantly larger for some measures (Y-balance test anterior reach distance: <i>p</i> <.001, <i>d</i> =.94; Timed-Up-and-Go time: <i>p</i> =.003, <i>d</i> =.81) compared to the low-volume group. The results indicate that balance training is effective to improve balance performance in healthy children and it seems that a 36-48 min/week compared to an 8 min/week training volume provides additional effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":74857,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine international open","volume":" ","pages":"E32-E38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/12/ea/10-1055-a-1811-1145.PMC9276332.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine international open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1811-1145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Concerning balance training, the most effective design of several load dimensions (e. g., training frequency, volume) is unclear. Thus, we determined the effects of different balance training volumes on dynamic balance in healthy children. Three groups of 20 children (age: 11.0±0.7 years; 47% females) were randomly assigned to a balance training group using a low or a high training volume or an active control group that performed regular physical education lessons. All groups trained for 8 weeks (2 sessions/week), whereby balance training volume amounted to 4 min/session and 18-24 min/session for the low- and high-volume group, respectively. Pre- and post-training, balance performance was assessed using the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test and the Timed-Up-and-Go Test. Fifty-five children completed the study and significant Test x Group interactions were detected for both outcome measures in favor of the two balance training groups. Additionally, improvements in the high-volume group were significantly larger for some measures (Y-balance test anterior reach distance: p <.001, d =.94; Timed-Up-and-Go time: p =.003, d =.81) compared to the low-volume group. The results indicate that balance training is effective to improve balance performance in healthy children and it seems that a 36-48 min/week compared to an 8 min/week training volume provides additional effects.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

不同平衡训练量对儿童动态平衡的影响。
对于平衡训练,最有效的设计是几种载荷尺寸(例如:(训练频率、数量)尚不清楚。因此,我们确定了不同的平衡训练量对健康儿童动态平衡的影响。3组20例(年龄:11.0±0.7岁;47%的女性)被随机分配到使用低或高训练量的平衡训练组或进行常规体育课程的积极对照组。所有组都训练了8周(2次/周),其中平衡训练量为4分钟/次,低量组和高量组分别为18-24分钟/次。在训练前和训练后,平衡性表现采用下季y -平衡测试和计时起跑测试进行评估。55名儿童完成了研究,在两个结果测量中检测到显著的测试x组相互作用,有利于两个平衡训练组。此外,在一些测量中,高容积组的改善明显更大(y -平衡测试前到达距离:p d = 0.94;定时启动时间:p =。003, d =.81)。结果表明,平衡训练对改善健康儿童的平衡能力是有效的,似乎36-48分钟/周的训练量比8分钟/周的训练量提供了额外的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信