Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation for primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism with or without previous parathyroidectomy: a retrospective study.

IF 3
Chi-Cheng Chen, Hsiu-Ling Chen, Pi-Ling Chiang, Sheng-Dean Luo, Yen-Hsiang Chang, Wei-Chih Chen, Cheng-Kang Wang, An-Ni Lin, Yueh-Sheng Chen, Shun-Yu Chi, Wei-Che Lin
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation for primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism with or without previous parathyroidectomy: a retrospective study.","authors":"Chi-Cheng Chen,&nbsp;Hsiu-Ling Chen,&nbsp;Pi-Ling Chiang,&nbsp;Sheng-Dean Luo,&nbsp;Yen-Hsiang Chang,&nbsp;Wei-Chih Chen,&nbsp;Cheng-Kang Wang,&nbsp;An-Ni Lin,&nbsp;Yueh-Sheng Chen,&nbsp;Shun-Yu Chi,&nbsp;Wei-Che Lin","doi":"10.1080/02656736.2022.2097324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to investigate and compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA), between primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) and secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) patients, with or without previous parathyroidectomy (PTX).</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>A total of 21 patients (7 PHPT, 14 SHPT) underwent RFA for hyperparathyroidism (HPT) at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan. Five of the 14 SHPT patients had previously received PTX. The laboratory data, volume change of each parathyroid nodule, symptomatic scores, and complications were analyzed and compared between all groups at 1 and 7 days, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after RFA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After RFA, the volume reduction ratio (VRR) for all patients at the last follow-up was 93.76%, and clinical symptoms significantly improved. At 12 months, all PHPT patients achieved successful treatment of intact PTH (iPTH). In SHPT patients, the mean iPTH value significantly decreased 1-day post-RFA, subsequently exhibiting a transient rebound which proceeded to decrease, with 57.1% reaching successful treatment standards. SHPT patients with PTX showed a lower complication score, shorter ablation time, higher iPTH baseline and outcomes, and lower VRR, compared to patients without PTX. The serum calcium level significantly decreased to normal range in 85.7% of all patients at 12 months. Severe hypocalcemia occurred in 23.8% at 1 week, and all were corrected with calcium supplements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RFA demonstrates a therapeutic efficacy similar to PTX. It can thus be considered an effective alternative treatment for PHPT, SHPT, or post-PTX patients who are unsuitable for another PTX.</p>","PeriodicalId":520653,"journal":{"name":"International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group","volume":" ","pages":"907-917"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2022.2097324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate and compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA), between primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) and secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) patients, with or without previous parathyroidectomy (PTX).

Subjects and methods: A total of 21 patients (7 PHPT, 14 SHPT) underwent RFA for hyperparathyroidism (HPT) at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan. Five of the 14 SHPT patients had previously received PTX. The laboratory data, volume change of each parathyroid nodule, symptomatic scores, and complications were analyzed and compared between all groups at 1 and 7 days, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after RFA.

Results: After RFA, the volume reduction ratio (VRR) for all patients at the last follow-up was 93.76%, and clinical symptoms significantly improved. At 12 months, all PHPT patients achieved successful treatment of intact PTH (iPTH). In SHPT patients, the mean iPTH value significantly decreased 1-day post-RFA, subsequently exhibiting a transient rebound which proceeded to decrease, with 57.1% reaching successful treatment standards. SHPT patients with PTX showed a lower complication score, shorter ablation time, higher iPTH baseline and outcomes, and lower VRR, compared to patients without PTX. The serum calcium level significantly decreased to normal range in 85.7% of all patients at 12 months. Severe hypocalcemia occurred in 23.8% at 1 week, and all were corrected with calcium supplements.

Conclusions: RFA demonstrates a therapeutic efficacy similar to PTX. It can thus be considered an effective alternative treatment for PHPT, SHPT, or post-PTX patients who are unsuitable for another PTX.

射频消融治疗原发性和继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性研究。
摘要:本研究旨在探讨超声引导下射频消融(RFA)治疗原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进(PHPT)和继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进(SHPT)患者的疗效和安全性,不论是否既往行甲状旁腺切除术(PTX)。对象与方法:台湾高雄长工纪念医院共21例甲状旁腺功能亢进(HPT)患者(7例PHPT, 14例SHPT)行RFA治疗。14例SHPT患者中有5例先前接受过PTX治疗。分析并比较各组患者在RFA后1、7天、1、3、6、12个月的实验室数据、每个甲状旁腺结节的体积变化、症状评分和并发症。结果:RFA后,所有患者末次随访时体积缩小率(VRR)为93.76%,临床症状明显改善。12个月时,所有PHPT患者均成功治疗完整PTH (iPTH)。SHPT患者的平均iPTH值在rfa后1天显著下降,随后出现短暂反弹并继续下降,57.1%达到成功治疗标准。与未行PTX的患者相比,行PTX的SHPT患者并发症评分较低,消融时间较短,iPTH基线和预后较高,VRR较低。85.7%的患者在12个月时血清钙水平明显降至正常范围。23.8%的患者在1周发生严重的低钙血症,所有患者均通过补钙纠正。结论:RFA的治疗效果与PTX相似。因此,它可以被认为是PHPT、SHPT或PTX后患者不适合另一种PTX的有效替代治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信