Researchers, animal support and regulatory staff: symbiosis or antagonism?

IF 2.7 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Benjamin Tsang, Robert Gerlai
{"title":"Researchers, animal support and regulatory staff: symbiosis or antagonism?","authors":"Benjamin Tsang, Robert Gerlai","doi":"10.1186/s42826-022-00129-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Animals are studied en masse by biologists around the world in a variety of biomedical and basic research studies. All this research benefits humankind and animals alike as it tackles a wide variety of problems ranging from those of conservation biology to medicine. Research with animal subjects is a complex endeavor that requires the cooperation and collaboration of a large number of experts, from the principal investigator through technicians and vivarium staff to regulatory experts. The research must be conducted in a humane manner that adheres to acceptable practices regulated by local, state and federal guidelines, rules and the law. In this short opinion article, we examine the current state of affairs regarding how researchers, animal support staff and regulatory experts work together. We pay particular attention to potential conflicts that may arise from the occasionally distinct roles played by those involved in animal research, and we provide some suggestions as short- and long-term remedies that have not been previously discussed in the literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":17993,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory Animal Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9264495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory Animal Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42826-022-00129-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Animals are studied en masse by biologists around the world in a variety of biomedical and basic research studies. All this research benefits humankind and animals alike as it tackles a wide variety of problems ranging from those of conservation biology to medicine. Research with animal subjects is a complex endeavor that requires the cooperation and collaboration of a large number of experts, from the principal investigator through technicians and vivarium staff to regulatory experts. The research must be conducted in a humane manner that adheres to acceptable practices regulated by local, state and federal guidelines, rules and the law. In this short opinion article, we examine the current state of affairs regarding how researchers, animal support staff and regulatory experts work together. We pay particular attention to potential conflicts that may arise from the occasionally distinct roles played by those involved in animal research, and we provide some suggestions as short- and long-term remedies that have not been previously discussed in the literature.

研究人员、动物辅助人员和监管人员:共生还是对立?
世界各地的生物学家在各种生物医学和基础研究中对动物进行了大量研究。所有这些研究都对人类和动物有益,因为它们解决了从保护生物学到医学等各种问题。以动物为研究对象的研究是一项复杂的工作,需要从主要研究人员到技术人员和动物馆工作人员再到监管专家等众多专家的合作与协作。研究必须以人道的方式进行,并遵守当地、州和联邦的指导方针、规则和法律所规定的可接受的做法。在这篇简短的评论文章中,我们将探讨研究人员、动物辅助人员和监管专家之间的合作现状。我们特别关注参与动物研究的人员偶尔扮演的不同角色可能导致的潜在冲突,并提出了一些文献中未曾讨论过的短期和长期补救措施建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信