Implant surface modifications as a prevention method for periprosthetic joint infection caused by Staphylococcus aureus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Journal of Bone and Joint Infection Pub Date : 2022-11-14 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5194/jbji-7-231-2022
Krisna Yuarno Phatama, Respati Suryanto Dradjat, Edi Mustamsir, Dwi Yuni Nurhidayati, Dewi Santosaningsih, Dwikora Novembri Utomo, Mohamad Hidayat
{"title":"Implant surface modifications as a prevention method for periprosthetic joint infection caused by <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Krisna Yuarno Phatama,&nbsp;Respati Suryanto Dradjat,&nbsp;Edi Mustamsir,&nbsp;Dwi Yuni Nurhidayati,&nbsp;Dewi Santosaningsih,&nbsp;Dwikora Novembri Utomo,&nbsp;Mohamad Hidayat","doi":"10.5194/jbji-7-231-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Periprosthetic joint infection is the most common infection due to joint replacement. It has been reported that, over a 5-year time span, 3.7 % of cases occurred annually. This statistic has increased to 6.86 % over 16 years. Thus, an effective method is required to reduce these complications. Several strategies such as coating methods with various materials, such as antibiotics, silver, and iodine, have been reported. However, the best preventive strategy is still undetermined. Therefore, this systematic review aims to evaluate the outcome of coating methods on joint arthroplasty as a treatment or preventive management for infection complications. <b>Methods</b>: Eligible articles were systematically searched from multiple electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane library, and ScienceDirect) up to 2 June 2022. Based on the criterion inclusion, eight articles were selected for this study. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the study, and the meta-analysis test was conducted with Review Manager 5.4. <b>Results</b>: The quality of the articles in this study is in the range of moderate to good. It was found that the application of modified antibiotic coatings significantly reduced the occurrence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) ( <math><mi>p</mi></math> 0.03), and silver coating could not significantly ( <math><mi>p</mi></math> 0.47) prevent the occurrence of PJI. However, according to the whole aspect of coating modification, the use of antibiotics, silver, and iodine can minimize the occurrence of PJI ( <math><mi>p</mi></math>   <math><mrow><mi><</mi> <mn>0.0001</mn></mrow> </math> ). <b>Conclusion</b>: Coating methods using antibiotics are an effective method that could significantly prevent the occurrence of PJI. On the other hand, coating with non-antibiotic materials such as silver could not significantly prevent the incidence of PJI.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9677338/pdf/jbji-7-231.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-7-231-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Periprosthetic joint infection is the most common infection due to joint replacement. It has been reported that, over a 5-year time span, 3.7 % of cases occurred annually. This statistic has increased to 6.86 % over 16 years. Thus, an effective method is required to reduce these complications. Several strategies such as coating methods with various materials, such as antibiotics, silver, and iodine, have been reported. However, the best preventive strategy is still undetermined. Therefore, this systematic review aims to evaluate the outcome of coating methods on joint arthroplasty as a treatment or preventive management for infection complications. Methods: Eligible articles were systematically searched from multiple electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane library, and ScienceDirect) up to 2 June 2022. Based on the criterion inclusion, eight articles were selected for this study. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the study, and the meta-analysis test was conducted with Review Manager 5.4. Results: The quality of the articles in this study is in the range of moderate to good. It was found that the application of modified antibiotic coatings significantly reduced the occurrence of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) ( p 0.03), and silver coating could not significantly ( p 0.47) prevent the occurrence of PJI. However, according to the whole aspect of coating modification, the use of antibiotics, silver, and iodine can minimize the occurrence of PJI ( p< 0.0001 ). Conclusion: Coating methods using antibiotics are an effective method that could significantly prevent the occurrence of PJI. On the other hand, coating with non-antibiotic materials such as silver could not significantly prevent the incidence of PJI.

假体表面修饰预防金黄色葡萄球菌引起假体周围关节感染的系统综述和荟萃分析
背景:假体周围关节感染是关节置换术后最常见的感染。据报道,在5年的时间跨度内,每年发生3.7 %的病例。这一统计数据在16年里增加到6.86 %。因此,需要一种有效的方法来减少这些并发症。已经报道了几种策略,例如用各种材料(如抗生素、银和碘)涂覆方法。然而,最佳的预防策略仍未确定。因此,本系统综述旨在评估关节置换术中涂层方法作为治疗或预防感染并发症的效果。方法:系统检索截至2022年6月2日的多个电子数据库(PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和ScienceDirect)中符合条件的文章。根据标准纳入,本研究选择了8篇文章。采用Newcastle-Ottawa量表(NOS)评估研究质量,采用Review Manager 5.4进行meta分析检验。结果:本研究的文章质量在中等到良好的范围内。应用改良抗生素涂层可显著降低假体周围关节感染(PJI)的发生(p 0.03),而镀银涂层不能显著预防PJI的发生(p 0.47)。然而,从包衣改性的整个方面来看,抗生素、银和碘的使用可以最大限度地减少PJI的发生(p 0.0001)。结论:抗生素包衣法是预防PJI发生的有效方法。另一方面,非抗生素材料(如银)涂层不能显著预防PJI的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信