Evaluation of Aerobic Conjunctival Flora in Patients with Demodex Blepharitis

Q3 Medicine
Ayten Gündüz, Ersan Ersin Demirel, Murat Fırat
{"title":"Evaluation of Aerobic Conjunctival Flora in Patients with <i>Demodex</i> Blepharitis","authors":"Ayten Gündüz,&nbsp;Ersan Ersin Demirel,&nbsp;Murat Fırat","doi":"10.4274/tpd.galenos.2022.88942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong><i>Demodex</i> species are frequently found in blepharitis cases. This study aimed to compare the conjunctival flora of eyes with <i>Demodex-positive</i> blepharitis and <i>Demodex-negative</i> blepharitis with healthy individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eyelash epilation was performed to detect <i>Demodex</i> from 44 eyes of 44 patients with chronic blepharitis and 44 eyes of 44 healthy controls and examined under a microscope. A conjunctival swab was taken from the same eye and inoculated on eosin methylene blue agar, Sabouraud dextrose agar, chocolate agar, and 5% sheep blood agar. Aerobic conjunctival flora was evaluated among <i>Demodex-positive</i> blepharitis, <i>Demodex-negative</i> blepharitis and healthy eyes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>Demodex</i> spp. was detected in 3 (6.8%) of 44 healthy controls and 24 (54.5%) of 44 patients with blepharitis. The most frequently isolated bacteria in healthy controls were coagulase-negative <i>Staphylococci</i> (CNS) spp. (n=32, 72.7%), <i>Streptococcus</i> spp. (n=16, 36.4%), <i>Corynebacterium</i> spp. (n=13, 29.5%). The most frequently isolated bacteria in <i>Demodex-positive</i> blepharitis were CNS spp. (n=14, 58.3%), <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (n=11, 45.8%), <i>Corynebacterium</i> spp. (n=7, 29.2%). In <i>Demodex-negative</i> blepharitis, CNS (n=10, 50.0%), <i>S. aureus</i> (n=10, 50.0%), <i>Corynebacterium</i> spp. (n=5, 25.0%) were most commonly isolated. <i>S. aureus</i> growth was significantly increased in the <i>Demodex</i> negative and positive blepharitis groups compared with the healthy group (p=0.001 and p=0.002, respectively). Although CNS spp. growth decreased in both groups with <i>Demodex-negative</i> and positive blepharitis compared with the healthy group; the decrease was significant only in those with <i>Demodex-negative</i> blepharitis (p=0.045). In terms of other bacterial growth, there was no significant difference between healthy eyes and <i>Demodex</i> positive and negative eyes with blepharitis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that <i>Demodex</i> blepharitis has no significant effect on conjunctival flora. Blepharitis itself may be the main factor in changes in the conjunctival flora.</p>","PeriodicalId":34974,"journal":{"name":"Turkiye parazitolojii dergisi","volume":" ","pages":"301-306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkiye parazitolojii dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tpd.galenos.2022.88942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Demodex species are frequently found in blepharitis cases. This study aimed to compare the conjunctival flora of eyes with Demodex-positive blepharitis and Demodex-negative blepharitis with healthy individuals.

Methods: Eyelash epilation was performed to detect Demodex from 44 eyes of 44 patients with chronic blepharitis and 44 eyes of 44 healthy controls and examined under a microscope. A conjunctival swab was taken from the same eye and inoculated on eosin methylene blue agar, Sabouraud dextrose agar, chocolate agar, and 5% sheep blood agar. Aerobic conjunctival flora was evaluated among Demodex-positive blepharitis, Demodex-negative blepharitis and healthy eyes.

Results: Demodex spp. was detected in 3 (6.8%) of 44 healthy controls and 24 (54.5%) of 44 patients with blepharitis. The most frequently isolated bacteria in healthy controls were coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CNS) spp. (n=32, 72.7%), Streptococcus spp. (n=16, 36.4%), Corynebacterium spp. (n=13, 29.5%). The most frequently isolated bacteria in Demodex-positive blepharitis were CNS spp. (n=14, 58.3%), Staphylococcus aureus (n=11, 45.8%), Corynebacterium spp. (n=7, 29.2%). In Demodex-negative blepharitis, CNS (n=10, 50.0%), S. aureus (n=10, 50.0%), Corynebacterium spp. (n=5, 25.0%) were most commonly isolated. S. aureus growth was significantly increased in the Demodex negative and positive blepharitis groups compared with the healthy group (p=0.001 and p=0.002, respectively). Although CNS spp. growth decreased in both groups with Demodex-negative and positive blepharitis compared with the healthy group; the decrease was significant only in those with Demodex-negative blepharitis (p=0.045). In terms of other bacterial growth, there was no significant difference between healthy eyes and Demodex positive and negative eyes with blepharitis.

Conclusion: We found that Demodex blepharitis has no significant effect on conjunctival flora. Blepharitis itself may be the main factor in changes in the conjunctival flora.

蠕形螨性睑炎患者需氧结膜菌群的评价
目的:蠕形螨是眼睑炎患者常见的蠕形螨种类。本研究旨在比较蠕形螨阳性眼炎和蠕形螨阴性眼炎与健康人的结膜菌群。方法:对44例慢性眼炎患者44只眼和44例健康对照者44只眼进行睫毛脱毛检测,显微镜下观察。从同一只眼睛取结膜拭子,接种于伊红亚甲基蓝琼脂、沙伯罗德葡萄糖琼脂、巧克力琼脂和5%羊血琼脂。对蠕形螨阳性眼炎、蠕形螨阴性眼炎和健康眼的需氧结膜菌群进行了评价。结果:44例正常人中检出蠕形螨3例(6.8%),44例眼炎患者中检出蠕形螨24例(54.5%)。健康对照组中检出最多的细菌为凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CNS) (n=32,占72.7%)、链球菌(n=16,占36.4%)、棒状杆菌(n=13,占29.5%)。蠕形螨阳性眼睑炎最常见的分离细菌为CNS链球菌(n=14, 58.3%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(n=11, 45.8%)、棒状杆菌(n=7, 29.2%)。在蠕形螨阴性的眼睑炎中,最常见的是CNS (n=10, 50.0%)、金黄色葡萄球菌(n=10, 50.0%)、棒状杆菌(n=5, 25.0%)。与健康组相比,蠕形螨阴性和阳性眼睑炎组的金黄色葡萄球菌生长明显增加(p=0.001和p=0.002)。虽然与健康组相比,蠕形螨阴性和阳性眼睑炎组的CNS sp的生长均有所下降;仅在蠕形螨阴性的眼睑炎患者中有显著性下降(p=0.045)。在其他细菌生长方面,健康眼与蠕形螨阳性、阴性眼炎患者无显著性差异。结论:眼睑蠕形螨对结膜菌群无明显影响。睑缘炎本身可能是引起结膜菌群变化的主要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkiye parazitolojii dergisi
Turkiye parazitolojii dergisi Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信