Comparing the number and length of primary care consultations in people with and without intellectual disabilities and health needs: observational cohort study using electronic health records.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Freya Tyrer, Richard Morriss, Reza Kiani, Satheesh K Gangadharan, Harish Kundaje, Mark J Rutherford
{"title":"Comparing the number and length of primary care consultations in people with and without intellectual disabilities and health needs: observational cohort study using electronic health records.","authors":"Freya Tyrer, Richard Morriss, Reza Kiani, Satheesh K Gangadharan, Harish Kundaje, Mark J Rutherford","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmac135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United Kingdom, 15-min appointments with the general practitioner (GP) are recommended for people with complex health conditions, including intellectual disabilities and health needs, but we do not know whether this happens.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We compared number and length of primary care consultations (GP, nurse, other allied health, other) for people with and without intellectual disabilities and health needs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Linked primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) in England were used to investigate face-to-face and telephone primary care consultations in 2017-2019. Health needs investigated were: epilepsy; incontinence; severe visual/hearing impairments; severe mobility difficulties; cerebral palsy; and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding. Age and gender-standardized consultation rates per year (Poisson), duration of consultations, and the proportion of \"long consultations\" (≥15 min) were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>People with intellectual disabilities (n = 7,794) had 1.9 times as many GP consultations per year as those without (n = 176,807; consultation rate ratio = 1.87 [95% confidence interval 1.86-1.89]). Consultation rates with nurses and allied healthcare professionals were also twice as high. Mean GP consultation time was 9-10 min regardless of intellectual disability/health need status. Long GP consultations were less common in people with intellectual disabilities (18.2% [17.8-18.7] vs. 20.9% [20.8-21.0]). Long consultations with practice nurses were more common in people with health needs, particularly severe visual loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>People with intellectual disabilities and/or health needs tend to have more, rather than longer, GP consultations compared with the rest of the population. We recommend further investigation into the role of practice nurses to support people with intellectual disabilities and health needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11324320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmac135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the United Kingdom, 15-min appointments with the general practitioner (GP) are recommended for people with complex health conditions, including intellectual disabilities and health needs, but we do not know whether this happens.

Aims: We compared number and length of primary care consultations (GP, nurse, other allied health, other) for people with and without intellectual disabilities and health needs.

Methods: Linked primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) in England were used to investigate face-to-face and telephone primary care consultations in 2017-2019. Health needs investigated were: epilepsy; incontinence; severe visual/hearing impairments; severe mobility difficulties; cerebral palsy; and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding. Age and gender-standardized consultation rates per year (Poisson), duration of consultations, and the proportion of "long consultations" (≥15 min) were reported.

Results: People with intellectual disabilities (n = 7,794) had 1.9 times as many GP consultations per year as those without (n = 176,807; consultation rate ratio = 1.87 [95% confidence interval 1.86-1.89]). Consultation rates with nurses and allied healthcare professionals were also twice as high. Mean GP consultation time was 9-10 min regardless of intellectual disability/health need status. Long GP consultations were less common in people with intellectual disabilities (18.2% [17.8-18.7] vs. 20.9% [20.8-21.0]). Long consultations with practice nurses were more common in people with health needs, particularly severe visual loss.

Conclusions: People with intellectual disabilities and/or health needs tend to have more, rather than longer, GP consultations compared with the rest of the population. We recommend further investigation into the role of practice nurses to support people with intellectual disabilities and health needs.

比较有智力障碍和健康需求的人与无智力障碍和健康需求的人接受初级保健咨询的次数和时间:使用电子健康记录的观察性队列研究。
背景:目的:我们比较了有智力障碍和健康需求的人与没有智力障碍和健康需求的人的初级医疗咨询(全科医生、护士、其他专职医疗人员、其他)次数和时间:我们使用英格兰临床实践研究数据链接(CPRD)中的关联初级医疗数据,调查了 2017-2019 年面对面和电话初级医疗咨询的情况。调查的健康需求包括:癫痫;大小便失禁;严重视力/听力障碍;严重行动不便;脑瘫;经皮内镜胃造口喂养。报告了每年按年龄和性别标准化的就诊率(泊松)、就诊时间和 "长时间就诊"(≥15 分钟)的比例:结果:智障人士(n = 7,794 人)每年接受全科医生咨询的次数是非智障人士(n = 176,807 人;咨询率比率 = 1.87 [95% 置信区间为 1.86-1.89])的 1.9 倍。护士和专职医疗人员的问诊率也是后者的两倍。无论智力残疾/健康需求状况如何,全科医生平均问诊时间为 9-10 分钟。智障人士接受全科医生长时间问诊的比例较低(18.2% [17.8-18.7] vs. 20.9% [20.8-21.0])。有健康需求(尤其是严重视力丧失)的人更常与执业护士长时间会诊:结论:与其他人群相比,智障人士和/或有健康需求的人士接受全科医生咨询的次数更多,而不是时间更长。我们建议进一步调查执业护士在支持智障人士和有健康需求人士方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信