Development and preliminary evaluation of a tele-rehabilitation exercise system using computer-generated animation.

Fujita Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-25 DOI:10.20407/fmj.2021-020
Nobuhiro Kumazawa, Soichiro Koyama, Masahiko Mukaino, Kazuhiro Tsuchiyama, Tsuyoshi Tatemoto, Hiroki Tanikawa, Kei Ohtsuka, Masaki Katoh, Yohei Otaka, Eiichi Saitoh, Shigeo Tanabe
{"title":"Development and preliminary evaluation of a tele-rehabilitation exercise system using computer-generated animation.","authors":"Nobuhiro Kumazawa,&nbsp;Soichiro Koyama,&nbsp;Masahiko Mukaino,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Tsuchiyama,&nbsp;Tsuyoshi Tatemoto,&nbsp;Hiroki Tanikawa,&nbsp;Kei Ohtsuka,&nbsp;Masaki Katoh,&nbsp;Yohei Otaka,&nbsp;Eiichi Saitoh,&nbsp;Shigeo Tanabe","doi":"10.20407/fmj.2021-020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the safety and acceptability of a newly developed tele-rehabilitation exercise system using computer-generated animation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participants comprised a convenience sample of 38 diverse individuals in Experiment 1 (15 healthy young people, 16 healthy older people, 5 patients with stroke, and 2 patients with respiratory disease) and 18 healthy older individuals in Experiment 2. Experiment 1 assessed safety in terms of cardiopulmonary vascular aspects and risk of fall, and Experiment 2 assessed treatment acceptability via a subjective evaluation. All participants completed the same exercise program. The safety assessment was conducted using heart rate (HR) and saturation of percutaneous oxygen (SpO2), measured before and after exercise. In addition, the occurrence of falls was assessed. For the acceptability assessment, the participants answered five questions (three-point Likert scale) after the exercise program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The safety assessment indicated that HR and SpO2 changed from 70.5±10.2 beats per minute and 97.8±1.3% before exercise to 87.6±13.6 beats per minute and 98.2±0.9% after exercise, respectively. In addition, all participants completed the exercises without experiencing any falls. In the acceptability assessment, the score reflecting continuation desire was the highest of the five items examined (2.71±0.46). In contrast, the adequacy of exercise intensity had the lowest score (1.29±0.57).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present system was confirmed to be safe, and the participants were motivated to continue the exercises. Future developments should incorporate a function to enable participants and medical staff to adjust exercise intensity according to individual physical function.</p>","PeriodicalId":33657,"journal":{"name":"Fujita Medical Journal","volume":"8 4","pages":"114-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9673083/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fujita Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2021-020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and acceptability of a newly developed tele-rehabilitation exercise system using computer-generated animation.

Methods: The participants comprised a convenience sample of 38 diverse individuals in Experiment 1 (15 healthy young people, 16 healthy older people, 5 patients with stroke, and 2 patients with respiratory disease) and 18 healthy older individuals in Experiment 2. Experiment 1 assessed safety in terms of cardiopulmonary vascular aspects and risk of fall, and Experiment 2 assessed treatment acceptability via a subjective evaluation. All participants completed the same exercise program. The safety assessment was conducted using heart rate (HR) and saturation of percutaneous oxygen (SpO2), measured before and after exercise. In addition, the occurrence of falls was assessed. For the acceptability assessment, the participants answered five questions (three-point Likert scale) after the exercise program.

Results: The safety assessment indicated that HR and SpO2 changed from 70.5±10.2 beats per minute and 97.8±1.3% before exercise to 87.6±13.6 beats per minute and 98.2±0.9% after exercise, respectively. In addition, all participants completed the exercises without experiencing any falls. In the acceptability assessment, the score reflecting continuation desire was the highest of the five items examined (2.71±0.46). In contrast, the adequacy of exercise intensity had the lowest score (1.29±0.57).

Conclusions: The present system was confirmed to be safe, and the participants were motivated to continue the exercises. Future developments should incorporate a function to enable participants and medical staff to adjust exercise intensity according to individual physical function.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

计算机动画远程康复训练系统的开发与初步评价。
目的:评价新开发的计算机动画远程康复训练系统的安全性和可接受性。方法:实验1选取38名不同个体(15名健康青年、16名健康老年人、5名卒中患者、2名呼吸系统疾病患者)和实验2选取18名健康老年人作为方便样本。实验1从心肺血管方面和跌倒风险方面评估安全性,实验2通过主观评价评估治疗的可接受性。所有的参与者都完成了同样的锻炼计划。采用运动前后的心率(HR)和经皮氧饱和度(SpO2)进行安全性评价。此外,还评估了跌倒的发生情况。对于可接受性评估,参与者在运动项目结束后回答了五个问题(三点李克特量表)。结果:安全性评价结果显示,运动前心率70.5±10.2次/分、SpO2 97.8±1.3%,运动后心率87.6±13.6次/分、SpO2 98.2±0.9%。此外,所有参与者都没有摔倒。在可接受性评价中,反映继续愿望的得分最高(2.71±0.46)。运动强度充分性得分最低(1.29±0.57)。结论:目前的系统是安全的,参与者有动力继续练习。未来的发展应该包含一个功能,使参与者和医务人员能够根据个人的身体功能调整运动强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信