Locations of objects are better remembered than their identities in naturalistic scenes: An eye-tracking experiment in mild cognitive impairment.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-11-10 DOI:10.1037/neu0000869
Moreno I Coco, Carolina Maruta, Isabel Pavão Martins, Sergio Della Sala
{"title":"Locations of objects are better remembered than their identities in naturalistic scenes: An eye-tracking experiment in mild cognitive impairment.","authors":"Moreno I Coco, Carolina Maruta, Isabel Pavão Martins, Sergio Della Sala","doi":"10.1037/neu0000869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Retaining the identity or location of decontextualized objects in visual short-term working memory (VWM) is impaired by healthy and pathological ageing, but research remains inconclusive on whether these two features are equally impacted by it. Moreover, it is unclear whether similar impairments would manifest in naturalistic visual contexts.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>30 people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 32 age-matched control participants (CPs) were eye-tracked within a change detection paradigm. They viewed 120 naturalistic scenes, and after a retention interval (1 s) asked whether a critical object in the scene had (or not) changed on either: <i>identity</i> (became a different object), <i>location</i> (same object but changed location), or <i>both</i> (changed in location and identity).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MCIs performed worse than CP but there was no interaction with the type of change. Changes in <i>both</i> were easiest while changes in identity alone were hardest. The latency to first fixation and first-pass duration to the critical object during successful recognition was not different between MCIs and CPs. Objects that changed in <i>both</i> features took longer to be fixated for the first time but required a shorter first pass compared to changes in identity alone which displayed the opposite pattern.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Locations of objects are better remembered than their identities; memory for changes is best when involving both features. These mechanisms are spared by pathological ageing as indicated by the similarity between groups besides trivial differences in overall performance. These findings demonstrate that VWM mechanisms in the context of naturalistic scene information are preserved in people with MCI. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":19205,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000869","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Retaining the identity or location of decontextualized objects in visual short-term working memory (VWM) is impaired by healthy and pathological ageing, but research remains inconclusive on whether these two features are equally impacted by it. Moreover, it is unclear whether similar impairments would manifest in naturalistic visual contexts.

Method: 30 people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and 32 age-matched control participants (CPs) were eye-tracked within a change detection paradigm. They viewed 120 naturalistic scenes, and after a retention interval (1 s) asked whether a critical object in the scene had (or not) changed on either: identity (became a different object), location (same object but changed location), or both (changed in location and identity).

Results: MCIs performed worse than CP but there was no interaction with the type of change. Changes in both were easiest while changes in identity alone were hardest. The latency to first fixation and first-pass duration to the critical object during successful recognition was not different between MCIs and CPs. Objects that changed in both features took longer to be fixated for the first time but required a shorter first pass compared to changes in identity alone which displayed the opposite pattern.

Conclusions: Locations of objects are better remembered than their identities; memory for changes is best when involving both features. These mechanisms are spared by pathological ageing as indicated by the similarity between groups besides trivial differences in overall performance. These findings demonstrate that VWM mechanisms in the context of naturalistic scene information are preserved in people with MCI. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

在自然场景中,物体的位置比它们的身份更容易被记住:一项针对轻度认知障碍的眼动追踪实验。
目的:在视觉短期工作记忆(VWM)中保留去文本化对象的身份或位置会受到健康和病理衰老的影响,但关于这两个特征是否同样受到影响的研究尚不确定。此外,还不清楚类似的损伤是否会在自然视觉环境中表现出来。方法:在变化检测范式下对30名轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者和32名年龄匹配的对照参与者(CP)进行眼动追踪。他们观看了120个自然场景,并在保持时间间隔(1秒)后询问场景中的关键对象是否发生了变化:身份(变成了不同的对象)、位置(相同的对象但改变了位置)或两者都发生了变化(位置和身份发生了变化)。结果:MCI的表现比CP差,但与变化类型没有交互作用。两者的改变都是最容易的,而身份的改变则是最难的。MCIs和CP在成功识别过程中第一次固定的潜伏期和第一次通过关键对象的持续时间没有差异。第一次固定两个特征都发生变化的对象需要更长的时间,但与显示相反模式的单独身份变化相比,第一次固定需要更短的时间。结论:物体的位置比其身份更容易被记住;当涉及到这两个功能时,更改的内存是最好的。病理性衰老使这些机制得以幸免,正如除了总体表现的微小差异外,各组之间的相似性所表明的那样。这些发现表明,自然场景信息背景下的VWM机制在MCI患者中得到了保留。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychology
Neuropsychology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychology publishes original, empirical research; systematic reviews and meta-analyses; and theoretical articles on the relation between brain and human cognitive, emotional, and behavioral function.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信