Impact of the Disk Diffusion Test on Fluconazole De-Escalation in Patients with Candidemia.

Suchavadee Tantasuwan, Piriyaporn Chongtrakool, Amiroh Waesamaae, Methee Chayakulkeeree
{"title":"Impact of the Disk Diffusion Test on Fluconazole De-Escalation in Patients with Candidemia.","authors":"Suchavadee Tantasuwan,&nbsp;Piriyaporn Chongtrakool,&nbsp;Amiroh Waesamaae,&nbsp;Methee Chayakulkeeree","doi":"10.3390/jof8111185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disk diffusion (DD) is a simple antifungal susceptibility method for <i>Candida</i>. This study examined the impact of fluconazole DD testing on antifungal de-escalation. We enrolled patients with candidemia whose <i>Candida</i> isolates were tested for fluconazole susceptibility using DD between January 2019 and January 2020. The historical controls were patients with candidemia who underwent fluconazole susceptibility testing using the broth microdilution (BMD) method. Clinical data including antifungal therapy were analyzed. In total, 108 patients were enrolled. Most baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. <i>C</i>. <i>tropicalis</i> was the predominant isolate (54.6%), followed by <i>C</i>. <i>albicans</i> (17.6%). The rates of antifungal de-escalation within 72 h were 25.9 and 9.3% in the DD and BMD groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.023). The median time to de-escalation was 3 days in the DD group, versus 6 days in the BMD group (<i>p</i> = 0.037). The 14-day mortality rate and antifungal cost tended to be lower in the DD group. There were no differences in the length of hospital stay and treatment-related complications between the two groups. The agreement between the DD and BMD results was 90%. DD testing can be substituted for BMD to enhance antifungal de-escalation and antifungal stewardship.</p>","PeriodicalId":520671,"journal":{"name":"Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9693788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8111185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disk diffusion (DD) is a simple antifungal susceptibility method for Candida. This study examined the impact of fluconazole DD testing on antifungal de-escalation. We enrolled patients with candidemia whose Candida isolates were tested for fluconazole susceptibility using DD between January 2019 and January 2020. The historical controls were patients with candidemia who underwent fluconazole susceptibility testing using the broth microdilution (BMD) method. Clinical data including antifungal therapy were analyzed. In total, 108 patients were enrolled. Most baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. C. tropicalis was the predominant isolate (54.6%), followed by C. albicans (17.6%). The rates of antifungal de-escalation within 72 h were 25.9 and 9.3% in the DD and BMD groups, respectively (p = 0.023). The median time to de-escalation was 3 days in the DD group, versus 6 days in the BMD group (p = 0.037). The 14-day mortality rate and antifungal cost tended to be lower in the DD group. There were no differences in the length of hospital stay and treatment-related complications between the two groups. The agreement between the DD and BMD results was 90%. DD testing can be substituted for BMD to enhance antifungal de-escalation and antifungal stewardship.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

盘片扩散试验对念珠菌病患者氟康唑降级的影响。
圆盘扩散法是一种简便的念珠菌药敏检测方法。本研究考察了氟康唑DD检测对抗真菌降级的影响。我们招募了2019年1月至2020年1月期间使用DD检测念珠菌分离株氟康唑敏感性的念珠菌病患者。历史对照组为念珠菌病患者,采用微量肉汤稀释法进行氟康唑药敏试验。分析临床资料,包括抗真菌治疗。共有108名患者入组。两组间大多数基线特征具有可比性。以热带梭菌(54.6%)为主,其次为白色梭菌(17.6%)。DD组和BMD组72h内抗真菌消退率分别为25.9%和9.3% (p = 0.023)。DD组的中位缓解时间为3天,而BMD组为6天(p = 0.037)。DD组14天死亡率和抗真菌费用较低。两组在住院时间和治疗相关并发症方面没有差异。DD和BMD结果的一致性为90%。DD测试可以代替BMD来增强抗真菌降级和抗真菌管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信