Bloodstream Infections in Patients with Hematologic Diseases: Causative Organisms and Factors Associated with Resistance.

IF 2.9
Hyeah Choi, Hyojin Ahn, Raeseok Lee, Sung-Yeon Cho, Dong-Gun Lee
{"title":"Bloodstream Infections in Patients with Hematologic Diseases: Causative Organisms and Factors Associated with Resistance.","authors":"Hyeah Choi,&nbsp;Hyojin Ahn,&nbsp;Raeseok Lee,&nbsp;Sung-Yeon Cho,&nbsp;Dong-Gun Lee","doi":"10.3947/ic.2022.0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with hematologic diseases are at high risk of bloodstream infections (BSIs). This study aimed to analyze clinical features and distributions of microorganisms in patients with hematologic diseases presenting at a tertiary care university-affiliated hospital in Korea.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed all BSI episodes recorded in patient medical records at two hematologic wards of the Catholic Hematology Hospital from January to December 2020. Our aim was to analyze demographic and clinical characteristics relevant to BSIs. We also described the antimicrobial resistance patterns of the major pathogens identified in this study, and evaluated risk factors for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production in <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> isolates and for vancomycin resistance in enterococcal isolates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 380 BSI episodes were identified in 334 patients over the course of 1 year (monomicrobial BSI episodes, 86.1%; polymicrobial BSI episodes, 13.9%). Gram-negative bacteria accounted for 242 isolates (54.8%). The most frequently isolated Gram-negative bacteria isolates were <i>Escherichia coli</i> (107 [24.2%]) followed by <i>Klebsiella</i> spp. (72 [16.3%]), <i>Pseudomonas</i> spp. (21 [4.8%]), and <i>Enterobacter</i> spp. (12 [2.7%]). The most commonly identified Gram-positive bacteria were <i>Enterococcus</i> spp. (72 [16.3%]) followed by viridans streptococci (54 [12.2%]), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (24 [5.4%]), and <i>Corynebacterium</i> spp. (22 [5.0%]). ESBL-producing <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> accounted for 25.1% of the total distribution. Among 54 <i>Enterococcus faecium</i> isolates, 100.0% were resistant to ampicillin and 55.6% showed resistance to vancomycin, while 100.0% (n = 12) of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> isolates were susceptible to ampicillin and vancomycin, respectively. Use of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis (odds ratio: 5.20; 95% confidence interval: 1.11 - 24.34; <i>P</i> = 0.04) was an independent risk factor for ESBL production in <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> BSIs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared with the results of a previous study conducted at the same institution, our findings demonstrated that Gram-negative bacteria remained dominant pathogens in BSIs occurring in patients with hematologic diseases. Our findings also demonstrated a comparatively decreased prevalence of ESBL-producing <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> in the evaluated BSIs. However, the prevalence of enterococcal BSIs had not decreased, and the proportion of vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococcus</i> isolates from <i>E. faecium</i> BSIs had increased. In addition, we found that ciprofloxacin prophylaxis was statistically significantly associated with ESBL production in <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> BSIs. We conclude that, in order to avoid critical complications and to reduce the burden of antimicrobial-resistant organisms in patients with hematologic diseases, it is necessary to conduct periodic examinations evaluating changes in BSI epidemiology within a single medical center.</p>","PeriodicalId":520645,"journal":{"name":"Infection & chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"340-352"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2b/c9/ic-54-340.PMC9259903.pdf","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection & chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3947/ic.2022.0069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background: Patients with hematologic diseases are at high risk of bloodstream infections (BSIs). This study aimed to analyze clinical features and distributions of microorganisms in patients with hematologic diseases presenting at a tertiary care university-affiliated hospital in Korea.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed all BSI episodes recorded in patient medical records at two hematologic wards of the Catholic Hematology Hospital from January to December 2020. Our aim was to analyze demographic and clinical characteristics relevant to BSIs. We also described the antimicrobial resistance patterns of the major pathogens identified in this study, and evaluated risk factors for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production in Enterobacteriaceae isolates and for vancomycin resistance in enterococcal isolates.

Results: A total of 380 BSI episodes were identified in 334 patients over the course of 1 year (monomicrobial BSI episodes, 86.1%; polymicrobial BSI episodes, 13.9%). Gram-negative bacteria accounted for 242 isolates (54.8%). The most frequently isolated Gram-negative bacteria isolates were Escherichia coli (107 [24.2%]) followed by Klebsiella spp. (72 [16.3%]), Pseudomonas spp. (21 [4.8%]), and Enterobacter spp. (12 [2.7%]). The most commonly identified Gram-positive bacteria were Enterococcus spp. (72 [16.3%]) followed by viridans streptococci (54 [12.2%]), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) (24 [5.4%]), and Corynebacterium spp. (22 [5.0%]). ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae accounted for 25.1% of the total distribution. Among 54 Enterococcus faecium isolates, 100.0% were resistant to ampicillin and 55.6% showed resistance to vancomycin, while 100.0% (n = 12) of Enterococcus faecalis isolates were susceptible to ampicillin and vancomycin, respectively. Use of ciprofloxacin prophylaxis (odds ratio: 5.20; 95% confidence interval: 1.11 - 24.34; P = 0.04) was an independent risk factor for ESBL production in Enterobacteriaceae BSIs.

Conclusion: Compared with the results of a previous study conducted at the same institution, our findings demonstrated that Gram-negative bacteria remained dominant pathogens in BSIs occurring in patients with hematologic diseases. Our findings also demonstrated a comparatively decreased prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the evaluated BSIs. However, the prevalence of enterococcal BSIs had not decreased, and the proportion of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus isolates from E. faecium BSIs had increased. In addition, we found that ciprofloxacin prophylaxis was statistically significantly associated with ESBL production in Enterobacteriaceae BSIs. We conclude that, in order to avoid critical complications and to reduce the burden of antimicrobial-resistant organisms in patients with hematologic diseases, it is necessary to conduct periodic examinations evaluating changes in BSI epidemiology within a single medical center.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

血液病患者的血液感染:病原体和与耐药性相关的因素。
背景:血液病患者是血液感染(BSIs)的高危人群。本研究旨在分析韩国某三级护理大学附属医院血液病患者的临床特征和微生物分布。材料和方法:我们回顾性地回顾了天主教血液学医院两个血液学病房2020年1月至12月患者病历中记录的所有BSI发作。我们的目的是分析与bsi相关的人口学和临床特征。我们还描述了本研究中发现的主要病原体的抗微生物药物耐药性模式,并评估了肠杆菌科分离株中广谱β -内酰胺酶(ESBL)产生和肠球菌分离株中万古霉素耐药性的危险因素。结果:在1年的治疗过程中,334例患者共发现380例BSI发作(单菌性BSI发作,86.1%;多微生物BSI发作,13.9%)。革兰氏阴性菌242株(54.8%);检出最多的革兰氏阴性菌为大肠杆菌107株(24.2%),其次为克雷伯氏菌72株(16.3%)、假单胞菌21株(4.8%)和肠杆菌12株(2.7%)。最常见的革兰氏阳性菌为肠球菌(72株[16.3%]),其次为翠绿链球菌(54株[12.2%])、凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(24株[5.4%])和棒状杆菌(22株[5.0%])。产esbl的肠杆菌科占总分布的25.1%。54株粪肠球菌对氨苄西林的耐药率为100.0%,对万古霉素的耐药率为55.6%,对氨苄西林和万古霉素的敏感性分别为100.0% (n = 12)。使用环丙沙星预防(优势比:5.20;95%置信区间:1.11 - 24.34;P = 0.04)是肠杆菌科bsi中产生ESBL的独立危险因素。结论:与先前在同一机构进行的研究结果相比,我们的研究结果表明革兰氏阴性菌仍然是血液病患者发生bsi的优势病原体。我们的研究结果还表明,在评估的bsi中,产生esbl的肠杆菌科的患病率相对降低。然而,肠球菌性bsi的患病率并没有下降,而且从大肠杆菌bsi中分离出的耐万古霉素肠球菌的比例有所增加。此外,我们发现环丙沙星预防与肠杆菌科bsi中ESBL的产生有统计学意义。我们的结论是,为了避免严重并发症和减轻血液病患者抗微生物耐药菌的负担,有必要在单一医疗中心进行定期检查,评估BSI流行病学的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书