Psychotherapy Under Lockdown: The Use and Experience of Teleconsultation by Psychotherapists During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Q2 Psychology
Clinical Psychology in Europe Pub Date : 2022-09-30 eCollection Date: 2022-09-01 DOI:10.32872/cpe.6821
Jessica Notermans, Pierre Philippot
{"title":"Psychotherapy Under Lockdown: The Use and Experience of Teleconsultation by Psychotherapists During the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Jessica Notermans, Pierre Philippot","doi":"10.32872/cpe.6821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Facing the COVID-19 pandemic, some psychotherapists had to propose remote consultations, i.e., teleconsultation. While some evidence suggests positive outcomes from teleconsultation, professionals still hold negative beliefs towards it. Additionally, no rigorous and integrative practice framework for teleconsultation has yet been developed. This article aims to explore the use and experience of teleconsultation by 1) investigating differences between psychotherapists proposing and not proposing it; 2) evaluating the impact of negative attitudes towards teleconsultation on various variables; 3) determining the perceived detrimental effect of teleconsultation, as opposed to in-person, on the therapeutic relationship and personal experience; and 4) providing insights for the development of a teleconsultation practice framework.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An online survey was distributed via different professional organisations across several countries to 246 (195 women) French-speaking psychotherapists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Psychotherapists who did not propose teleconsultation believed it to be more technically challenging than psychotherapists who proposed it, but felt less constrained to propose it, and had less colleagues offering it. Attitudes towards teleconsultation showed no significant associations with therapeutic relationship, personal experience, and percentage of teleconsultation. As compared to in-person, empathy, congruence, and therapeutic alliance were perceived to significantly deteriorate online, whereas work organisation was perceived to be significantly better. While most psychotherapists proposed remote consultations, they did not provide adaptations to such setting (e.g., ascertaining a neutral video background); nor used videoconferencing platforms meeting privacy and confidentiality criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Training and evidenced-based information should be urgently provided to practitioners to develop rigorous guidelines and an ethically and legally safe practice framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":34029,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","volume":" ","pages":"e6821"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9667335/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.6821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Facing the COVID-19 pandemic, some psychotherapists had to propose remote consultations, i.e., teleconsultation. While some evidence suggests positive outcomes from teleconsultation, professionals still hold negative beliefs towards it. Additionally, no rigorous and integrative practice framework for teleconsultation has yet been developed. This article aims to explore the use and experience of teleconsultation by 1) investigating differences between psychotherapists proposing and not proposing it; 2) evaluating the impact of negative attitudes towards teleconsultation on various variables; 3) determining the perceived detrimental effect of teleconsultation, as opposed to in-person, on the therapeutic relationship and personal experience; and 4) providing insights for the development of a teleconsultation practice framework.

Method: An online survey was distributed via different professional organisations across several countries to 246 (195 women) French-speaking psychotherapists.

Results: Psychotherapists who did not propose teleconsultation believed it to be more technically challenging than psychotherapists who proposed it, but felt less constrained to propose it, and had less colleagues offering it. Attitudes towards teleconsultation showed no significant associations with therapeutic relationship, personal experience, and percentage of teleconsultation. As compared to in-person, empathy, congruence, and therapeutic alliance were perceived to significantly deteriorate online, whereas work organisation was perceived to be significantly better. While most psychotherapists proposed remote consultations, they did not provide adaptations to such setting (e.g., ascertaining a neutral video background); nor used videoconferencing platforms meeting privacy and confidentiality criteria.

Conclusion: Training and evidenced-based information should be urgently provided to practitioners to develop rigorous guidelines and an ethically and legally safe practice framework.

封锁下的心理治疗:COVID-19大流行第一波期间心理治疗师对远程咨询的使用和体验。
背景:面对 COVID-19 的流行,一些心理治疗师不得不提出远程咨询,即远程会诊。虽然有证据表明远程会诊能带来积极的效果,但专业人士对其仍持否定态度。此外,远程会诊尚未形成严格的综合实践框架。本文旨在通过以下方式探讨远程会诊的使用和体验:1)调查提出和未提出远程会诊的心理治疗师之间的差异;2)评估对远程会诊的负面态度对各种变量的影响;3)确定远程会诊与面对面会诊相比对治疗关系和个人体验的不利影响;4)为远程会诊实践框架的发展提供见解:方法:通过多个国家的不同专业组织向 246 名(195 名女性)讲法语的心理治疗师进行了在线调查:结果:未提议远程会诊的心理治疗师认为,远程会诊在技术上比提议远程会诊的心理治疗师更具挑战性,但他们在提议远程会诊时受到的限制较少,而且提供远程会诊的同事也较少。对远程会诊的态度与治疗关系、个人经历和远程会诊的比例没有明显关联。与面对面咨询相比,共鸣、一致性和治疗联盟被认为会明显恶化,而工作组织被认为会明显改善。虽然大多数心理治疗师都建议进行远程咨询,但他们并没有提供适应这种环境的方法(例如,确定中立的视频背景);也没有使用符合隐私和保密标准的视频会议平台:结论:应立即向从业人员提供培训和以证据为基础的信息,以制定严格的指导原则和伦理与法律上安全的实践框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology in Europe
Clinical Psychology in Europe Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信