Drainage of Complex Walled-Off Pancreatic Fluid Collections in LAMS Era: A Multicenter Study.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2022-10-29 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/9250370
Thanawat Luangsukrerk, Kamin Harinwan, Stanley Khoo, Pradermchai Kongkam
{"title":"Drainage of Complex Walled-Off Pancreatic Fluid Collections in LAMS Era: A Multicenter Study.","authors":"Thanawat Luangsukrerk,&nbsp;Kamin Harinwan,&nbsp;Stanley Khoo,&nbsp;Pradermchai Kongkam","doi":"10.1155/2022/9250370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) has been increasingly used for EUS-guided drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic fluid collection (WOPFC) in recent years. Nevertheless, some WOPFCs may require additional drainage methods including another LAMS as a result of complexity of the lesions. This current study aimed to compare clinical parameters of patients with complex WOPFC requiring LAMS with additional methods (complex WOPFC: group A) versus single LAMS alone (noncomplex WOPFC; group B).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Medical records of patients with complex (group A) versus noncomplex WOPFCs (group B) were reviewed and compared in three centers in Thailand and Malaysia, between January 2016 to December 2020.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>31 patients with WOPFCs were recruited. 6 of 31 (19%) patients were in group A. Multivariate analysis showed that the maximal diameter of WOPFCs in group A was significantly larger than that of group B (18 ± 6 versus 13 ± 3 cm in diameter, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.021). Solid component proportion was higher in group A versus B (35.8% versus 17.8%, respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.025). The prevalence of pancreatic duct leakage was significantly higher in group A (67% versus 20%, <i>p</i> = 0.23). The need of direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) and the number of DEN sessions were higher in group A versus B (100% vs. 48%, <i>p</i> = 0.020 and 3.5 vs 0 <i>p</i> = 0.031, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Complex WOPFC had larger diameter of lesions, higher proportion of solid component, higher prevalence of pancreatic duct leakage, and higher number of DEN is required than group noncomplex lesions. <i>Trial Registration.</i> This trial is registered with TCTR20180223004.</p>","PeriodicalId":48755,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"9250370"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9637039/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9250370","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) has been increasingly used for EUS-guided drainage of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic fluid collection (WOPFC) in recent years. Nevertheless, some WOPFCs may require additional drainage methods including another LAMS as a result of complexity of the lesions. This current study aimed to compare clinical parameters of patients with complex WOPFC requiring LAMS with additional methods (complex WOPFC: group A) versus single LAMS alone (noncomplex WOPFC; group B).

Method: Medical records of patients with complex (group A) versus noncomplex WOPFCs (group B) were reviewed and compared in three centers in Thailand and Malaysia, between January 2016 to December 2020.

Result: 31 patients with WOPFCs were recruited. 6 of 31 (19%) patients were in group A. Multivariate analysis showed that the maximal diameter of WOPFCs in group A was significantly larger than that of group B (18 ± 6 versus 13 ± 3 cm in diameter, respectively, p = 0.021). Solid component proportion was higher in group A versus B (35.8% versus 17.8%, respectively, p = 0.025). The prevalence of pancreatic duct leakage was significantly higher in group A (67% versus 20%, p = 0.23). The need of direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) and the number of DEN sessions were higher in group A versus B (100% vs. 48%, p = 0.020 and 3.5 vs 0 p = 0.031, respectively).

Conclusions: Complex WOPFC had larger diameter of lesions, higher proportion of solid component, higher prevalence of pancreatic duct leakage, and higher number of DEN is required than group noncomplex lesions. Trial Registration. This trial is registered with TCTR20180223004.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

LAMS时代复杂壁闭塞性胰液收集的引流:一项多中心研究。
背景:近年来,腔旁金属支架(LAMS)越来越多地用于eus引导下的症状性壁闭塞性胰液收集(WOPFC)引流。然而,由于病变的复杂性,一些wopfc可能需要额外的引流方法,包括另一种LAMS。本研究旨在比较复杂WOPFC患者的临床参数,这些患者需要LAMS和其他方法(复杂WOPFC: A组)与单独LAMS(非复杂WOPFC;方法:在2016年1月至2020年12月期间,对泰国和马来西亚三个中心的复杂(A组)和非复杂wopfc (B组)患者的医疗记录进行回顾和比较。结果:31例wopfc患者入选。多因素分析显示,A组wopfc最大直径明显大于B组(分别为18±6 cm和13±3 cm, p = 0.021)。固体成分比例A组高于B组(分别为35.8%比17.8%,p = 0.025)。A组胰管渗漏发生率明显高于对照组(67% vs 20%, p = 0.23)。A组与B组相比,直接内镜下坏死切除术(DEN)的需求和DEN手术次数更高(分别为100%对48%,p = 0.020和3.5对0 p = 0.031)。结论:与非复杂病变组相比,复杂WOPFC病变直径更大,实性成分比例更高,胰管渗漏发生率更高,需要更多的DEN。试验注册。本试验注册号为TCTR20180223004。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of gastroenterology and liver disease - medicine and surgery. The Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is sponsored by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology and the Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信