Optimal Catheter Ablation Strategy for Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure: A Retrospective Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-06-23 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/3002391
Cheng-Ming Ma, Ye-Jian He, Wen-Wen Li, Hua-Min Tang, Shi-Yu Dai, Xiao-Meng Yin, Xian-Jie Xiao, Yun-Long Xia, Lian-Jun Gao, Yuan-Jun Sun, Zhong-Zhen Wang, Rong-Feng Zhang
{"title":"Optimal Catheter Ablation Strategy for Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Cheng-Ming Ma,&nbsp;Ye-Jian He,&nbsp;Wen-Wen Li,&nbsp;Hua-Min Tang,&nbsp;Shi-Yu Dai,&nbsp;Xiao-Meng Yin,&nbsp;Xian-Jie Xiao,&nbsp;Yun-Long Xia,&nbsp;Lian-Jun Gao,&nbsp;Yuan-Jun Sun,&nbsp;Zhong-Zhen Wang,&nbsp;Rong-Feng Zhang","doi":"10.1155/2022/3002391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimal catheter ablation (CA) strategy for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) and heart failure (HF) remains uncertain. Between 2016 and 2020, 118 consecutive patients with PeAF and HF who underwent the CA procedure in two centers were retrospectively evaluated and divided into the pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)-only and PVI + additional ablation groups. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed at baseline, one month, and 12 months after the CA procedure. The HF symptoms and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvements were analyzed. Fifty-six patients underwent PVI only, and 62 patients received PVI with additional ablation. Compared with the baseline, a significant improvement in the LVEF and left atrial diameter postablation was observed in all patients. No significant HF improvement was detected in the PVI + additional ablation group than in the PVI-only group (74.2% vs. 71.4%, <i>P</i> = 0.736), but the procedure and ablation time were significantly longer (137.4 ± 7.5 vs. 123.1 ± 11.5 min, <i>P</i> = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the change in TTE parameters and the number of rehospitalizations. For patients with PeAF and HF, CA appears to improve left ventricular function. Additional ablation does not improve outcomes and has a significantly longer procedure time. Trial registration number is as follows: ChiCTR2100053745 (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx).</p>","PeriodicalId":9494,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9246569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3002391","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The optimal catheter ablation (CA) strategy for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) and heart failure (HF) remains uncertain. Between 2016 and 2020, 118 consecutive patients with PeAF and HF who underwent the CA procedure in two centers were retrospectively evaluated and divided into the pulmonary vein isolation (PVI)-only and PVI + additional ablation groups. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed at baseline, one month, and 12 months after the CA procedure. The HF symptoms and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvements were analyzed. Fifty-six patients underwent PVI only, and 62 patients received PVI with additional ablation. Compared with the baseline, a significant improvement in the LVEF and left atrial diameter postablation was observed in all patients. No significant HF improvement was detected in the PVI + additional ablation group than in the PVI-only group (74.2% vs. 71.4%, P = 0.736), but the procedure and ablation time were significantly longer (137.4 ± 7.5 vs. 123.1 ± 11.5 min, P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in the change in TTE parameters and the number of rehospitalizations. For patients with PeAF and HF, CA appears to improve left ventricular function. Additional ablation does not improve outcomes and has a significantly longer procedure time. Trial registration number is as follows: ChiCTR2100053745 (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

持续性心房颤动合并心力衰竭患者的最佳导管消融策略:一项回顾性研究。
对于持续性心房颤动(PeAF)和心力衰竭(HF)患者的最佳导管消融(CA)策略仍不确定。在2016年至2020年期间,回顾性评估了118名连续在两个中心接受CA手术的PeAF和HF患者,并将其分为仅肺静脉隔离(PVI)组和PVI +附加消融组。经胸超声心动图(TTE)分别在基线、CA术后1个月和12个月进行。分析HF症状及左室射血分数(LVEF)改善情况。56例患者仅行PVI, 62例患者行PVI加消融。与基线相比,消融后所有患者的左心房内径和左心室房颤均有显著改善。PVI +附加消融组与仅PVI组相比,HF无明显改善(74.2% vs. 71.4%, P = 0.736),但消融过程和消融时间明显更长(137.4±7.5 vs. 123.1±11.5 min, P = 0.001)。两组在TTE参数变化和再住院次数方面无显著差异。对于PeAF和HF患者,CA似乎可以改善左心室功能。额外的消融不能改善预后,而且手术时间明显延长。试验注册号:ChiCTR2100053745(中国临床试验注册中心;https://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology Research and Practice
Cardiology Research and Practice Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies that focus on the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The journal welcomes submissions related to systemic hypertension, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信