Advance Care Planning Among Adult Patients and Their End-of-Life Care Preferences.

Omega Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-12-02 DOI:10.1177/00302228221143687
Chia-Jen Liu, Chun-Yi Yang, Ming-Hsuan Hsieh, Chih-Kuang Liu, Ming-Chih Chen, Sheng-Jean Huang, Te-Chun Yeh
{"title":"Advance Care Planning Among Adult Patients and Their End-of-Life Care Preferences.","authors":"Chia-Jen Liu, Chun-Yi Yang, Ming-Hsuan Hsieh, Chih-Kuang Liu, Ming-Chih Chen, Sheng-Jean Huang, Te-Chun Yeh","doi":"10.1177/00302228221143687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To explore people's intentions to opt for a good death when planning for their end-of-life care, this study examined the type of end-of-life care preferred by patients receiving advance care planning (ACP) consulting services for five specified clinical and disability conditions and possible factors affecting their decision-making. This cross-sectional study analyzed 1303 hospital patients and 1032 nonhospital patients who attended a clinic providing ACP consulting services. This study revealed the following two results. First, patients who were older, were female, did not have an appointed surrogate decision-maker, and were nonhospital patients had a higher intention of not receiving life-sustaining treatments (LST) or artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) under the five specified clinical and disability conditions. Second, people who were the least willing to receive LST or ANH under the following conditions (in descending order): permanent vegetative state, severe dementia, irreversible coma, other disease conditions recognized by the central competent authority, and end-of-life stage.</p>","PeriodicalId":74338,"journal":{"name":"Omega","volume":" ","pages":"837-850"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228221143687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To explore people's intentions to opt for a good death when planning for their end-of-life care, this study examined the type of end-of-life care preferred by patients receiving advance care planning (ACP) consulting services for five specified clinical and disability conditions and possible factors affecting their decision-making. This cross-sectional study analyzed 1303 hospital patients and 1032 nonhospital patients who attended a clinic providing ACP consulting services. This study revealed the following two results. First, patients who were older, were female, did not have an appointed surrogate decision-maker, and were nonhospital patients had a higher intention of not receiving life-sustaining treatments (LST) or artificial nutrition and hydration (ANH) under the five specified clinical and disability conditions. Second, people who were the least willing to receive LST or ANH under the following conditions (in descending order): permanent vegetative state, severe dementia, irreversible coma, other disease conditions recognized by the central competent authority, and end-of-life stage.

成年患者的临终关怀规划及其临终关怀偏好。
为了探究人们在规划临终关怀时选择善终的意愿,本研究调查了因五种特定临床和残疾状况而接受预先护理规划(ACP)咨询服务的患者所偏好的临终关怀类型,以及影响其决策的可能因素。这项横断面研究分析了 1303 名医院患者和 1032 名非医院患者,他们都曾在提供 ACP 咨询服务的诊所就诊。这项研究揭示了以下两个结果。首先,年龄较大、女性、没有指定代理决策者以及非医院患者在五种特定的临床和残疾条件下不接受维持生命治疗(LST)或人工营养和水合治疗(ANH)的意愿较高。其次,在以下条件下最不愿意接受生命维持治疗或人工营养和水分补充(按降序排列):永久性植物人状态、严重痴呆、不可逆转的昏迷、中央主管机构认可的其他疾病状况以及生命终结阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信