A Systematic Review of Behavioral Outcomes for Leadership Interventions Among Health Professionals.

Michelle Cleary, Rachel Kornhaber, Deependra Kaji Thapa, Sancia West, Denis Visentin
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Behavioral Outcomes for Leadership Interventions Among Health Professionals.","authors":"Michelle Cleary,&nbsp;Rachel Kornhaber,&nbsp;Deependra Kaji Thapa,&nbsp;Sancia West,&nbsp;Denis Visentin","doi":"10.1097/JNR.0000000000000397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare requires effective leadership to improve patient outcomes, manage change, and achieve organizational goals.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate interventions aimed at improving leadership behavior in health professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review of key databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus) was performed in September 2018. Data were extracted and synthesized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three articles from 31 studies met the inclusion criteria. Self-reported leadership behavior showed a significant postprogram improvement. Objective observations were more likely to show improved leadership behavior than subjective observations. Face-to-face delivery of leadership development was more effective than online delivery. Interventions incorporating the elements of personal development planning, self-directed learning, workplace-based learning, and reflection were more likely to develop leadership behavior.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications for practice: </strong>Leadership interventions had a beneficial effect on the leadership behaviors of participants based on both subjective and objective changes in behavior. In addition to focusing on individual skill development, interventions that aim to develop leadership should consider the organizational, social, cultural, and political contexts in which behavioral change is expected. Workplace-based learning should be included in program development.</p>","PeriodicalId":94242,"journal":{"name":"The journal of nursing research : JNR","volume":" ","pages":"e118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/JNR.0000000000000397","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of nursing research : JNR","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNR.0000000000000397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Healthcare requires effective leadership to improve patient outcomes, manage change, and achieve organizational goals.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate interventions aimed at improving leadership behavior in health professionals.

Methods: A systematic literature review of key databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus) was performed in September 2018. Data were extracted and synthesized.

Results: Thirty-three articles from 31 studies met the inclusion criteria. Self-reported leadership behavior showed a significant postprogram improvement. Objective observations were more likely to show improved leadership behavior than subjective observations. Face-to-face delivery of leadership development was more effective than online delivery. Interventions incorporating the elements of personal development planning, self-directed learning, workplace-based learning, and reflection were more likely to develop leadership behavior.

Conclusions/implications for practice: Leadership interventions had a beneficial effect on the leadership behaviors of participants based on both subjective and objective changes in behavior. In addition to focusing on individual skill development, interventions that aim to develop leadership should consider the organizational, social, cultural, and political contexts in which behavioral change is expected. Workplace-based learning should be included in program development.

卫生专业人员领导干预行为结果的系统回顾。
背景:医疗保健需要有效的领导来改善患者的治疗效果、管理变化和实现组织目标。目的:本研究的目的是评估旨在改善卫生专业人员领导行为的干预措施。方法:于2018年9月对关键数据库(PubMed、CINAHL、Embase、Scopus)进行系统文献综述。提取并合成数据。结果:31项研究的33篇文章符合纳入标准。自我报告的领导行为表现出显著的项目后改善。客观观察比主观观察更有可能显示出领导行为的改善。面对面的领导力发展培训比在线培训更有效。结合个人发展规划、自主学习、基于工作场所的学习和反思等因素的干预更有可能发展领导行为。结论/实践启示:领导力干预对参与者的主观和客观行为变化都有有益的影响。除了关注个人技能发展之外,旨在培养领导力的干预措施还应该考虑到行为改变所处的组织、社会、文化和政治环境。基于工作场所的学习应该包括在项目开发中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信