Ontogeny of Orbit Orientation in Primates.

IF 2.1
Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) Pub Date : 2019-11-01 Epub Date: 2019-07-01 DOI:10.1002/ar.24193
Emily M Nett, Matthew J Ravosa
{"title":"Ontogeny of Orbit Orientation in Primates.","authors":"Emily M Nett,&nbsp;Matthew J Ravosa","doi":"10.1002/ar.24193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Orbit orientation in primates has been linked to adaptive factors related to activity pattern and size-related variation in structural influences on orbit position. Although differences in circumorbital form between anthropoids and strepsirrhines appear to be related to interspecific disparities in levels of orbital convergence and orbital frontation, there is considerable overlap in convergence between suborders. Unfortunately, putative links between convergence and frontation across primates, and consequent arguments about primate and anthropoid origins, are likely to be influenced by allometry, the size range of a respective sample, and adaptive influences on encephalization and activity patterns. Such a multifarious system is less amenable to interspecific treatment across higher-level clades. An ontogenetic perspective is one way to evaluate transformations from one character state to another, especially as they pertain to allometric effects on phenotypic variation. We characterized the ontogeny of orbital convergence and frontation in 13 anthropoid and strepsirrhine species. In each suborder, correlation and regression analyses were used to test hypotheses regarding the allometric bases of variation in orbital orientation. Growth trajectories were analyzed intra- and inter-specifically. Frontation decreased postnatally in all taxa due to the negative scaling of brain vs. skull size. Further, interspecific variation in relative levels of frontation was linked to corresponding ontogenetic transpositions in encephalization that differed within both suborders. In strepsirrhines, postnatal increases in convergence were largely due to the negative allometry of orbit vs. skull size. In contrast, convergence in anthropoids varied little during growth, being unrelated to ontogenetic variation in either relative orbit or interorbit size. Anat Rec, 302:2093-2104, 2019. © 2019 American Association for Anatomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":520555,"journal":{"name":"Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)","volume":" ","pages":"2093-2104"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/ar.24193","citationCount":"45","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.24193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

Abstract

Orbit orientation in primates has been linked to adaptive factors related to activity pattern and size-related variation in structural influences on orbit position. Although differences in circumorbital form between anthropoids and strepsirrhines appear to be related to interspecific disparities in levels of orbital convergence and orbital frontation, there is considerable overlap in convergence between suborders. Unfortunately, putative links between convergence and frontation across primates, and consequent arguments about primate and anthropoid origins, are likely to be influenced by allometry, the size range of a respective sample, and adaptive influences on encephalization and activity patterns. Such a multifarious system is less amenable to interspecific treatment across higher-level clades. An ontogenetic perspective is one way to evaluate transformations from one character state to another, especially as they pertain to allometric effects on phenotypic variation. We characterized the ontogeny of orbital convergence and frontation in 13 anthropoid and strepsirrhine species. In each suborder, correlation and regression analyses were used to test hypotheses regarding the allometric bases of variation in orbital orientation. Growth trajectories were analyzed intra- and inter-specifically. Frontation decreased postnatally in all taxa due to the negative scaling of brain vs. skull size. Further, interspecific variation in relative levels of frontation was linked to corresponding ontogenetic transpositions in encephalization that differed within both suborders. In strepsirrhines, postnatal increases in convergence were largely due to the negative allometry of orbit vs. skull size. In contrast, convergence in anthropoids varied little during growth, being unrelated to ontogenetic variation in either relative orbit or interorbit size. Anat Rec, 302:2093-2104, 2019. © 2019 American Association for Anatomy.

灵长类动物轨道定向的个体发育。
灵长类动物的轨道方向与活动模式相关的适应性因素和轨道位置结构影响的大小相关的变化有关。虽然类人猿和链霉菌之间的环眼眶形式差异似乎与眼眶收敛和眼眶对前水平的种间差异有关,但亚目之间的收敛有相当大的重叠。不幸的是,灵长类趋同和对抗之间的假定联系,以及由此产生的关于灵长类和类人猿起源的争论,很可能受到异速生长、各自样本的大小范围以及对脑化和活动模式的适应性影响的影响。这样一个多样化的系统不太适合在更高级别的进化枝上进行种间处理。个体发生的观点是评估从一种性状状态到另一种性状状态的转变的一种方法,特别是当它们涉及到异速生长对表型变异的影响时。我们研究了13种类人猿和链球菌的眼眶会聚和对位的个体发育特征。在每个亚目中,使用相关和回归分析来检验关于轨道取向变异的异速基础的假设。分析了种内和种间的生长轨迹。由于脑与颅骨大小的负比例,所有分类群的额叶在出生后都减少了。此外,相对水平的种间变异与两个亚目不同的脑化中相应的个体发生转位有关。在链霉素中,出生后趋同的增加主要是由于眼眶与颅骨大小的负异速。相比之下,类人猿的收敛在生长过程中变化不大,与相对轨道或轨道间大小的个体发生变化无关。中国生物医学工程学报,2016,32(2):393 - 3104。©2019美国解剖学协会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信