Onset of the COVID-19 pandemic reduced active time in patients with implanted cardiac devices.

IF 3.5
Nicholas Sommers, Marcie Berger, Jason C Rubenstein, James Roth, Amy Pan, Colton Thompson, Michael E Widlansky
{"title":"Onset of the COVID-19 pandemic reduced active time in patients with implanted cardiac devices.","authors":"Nicholas Sommers,&nbsp;Marcie Berger,&nbsp;Jason C Rubenstein,&nbsp;James Roth,&nbsp;Amy Pan,&nbsp;Colton Thompson,&nbsp;Michael E Widlansky","doi":"10.1186/s11556-022-00305-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical inactivity and sedentary behavior are modifiable risk factors for chronic disease and all-cause mortality that may have been negatively impacted by the COVID-19 shutdowns.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Accelerometry data was retrospectively collected from 332 permanent pacemaker (PPM) and 244 implantable cardiac defibrillation (ICD) patients for 6 time points: March 15-May 15, 2020 (pandemic period), January 1-March 14, 2020, October 1-December 31, 2019, March 15-May 15, 2019, January 1-March 14, 2019, and October 1-December 31, 2018. Paired t-tests, with Bonferroni correction, were used to compare time periods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Activity significantly decreased during the pandemic period compared to one year prior by an average of 0.53 ± 1.18h/day (P < 0.001) for PPM patients and 0.51 ± 1.2h/day (P < 0.001) for ICD patients. Stratification of subjects by active time (< 2 versus ≥ 2h/day) showed patients with < 2h, particularly those with ICDs, had modestly greater activity reductions with the pandemic onset. Logistical regression analyses suggest a trend toward a greater reduction in active time at the onset of the pandemic and an increased risk of hospital or emergency department (ED) admission for PPM patients, but not ICD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The onset of the pandemic in the United States was associated with a significant drop in PPM and ICD patient active hours that was modestly more pronounced in less active patients and cannot be explained by one year of aging or seasonal variation. If sustained, these populations may experience excess cardiovascular morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":520622,"journal":{"name":"European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity","volume":" ","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9628136/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-022-00305-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physical inactivity and sedentary behavior are modifiable risk factors for chronic disease and all-cause mortality that may have been negatively impacted by the COVID-19 shutdowns.

Methods: Accelerometry data was retrospectively collected from 332 permanent pacemaker (PPM) and 244 implantable cardiac defibrillation (ICD) patients for 6 time points: March 15-May 15, 2020 (pandemic period), January 1-March 14, 2020, October 1-December 31, 2019, March 15-May 15, 2019, January 1-March 14, 2019, and October 1-December 31, 2018. Paired t-tests, with Bonferroni correction, were used to compare time periods.

Results: Activity significantly decreased during the pandemic period compared to one year prior by an average of 0.53 ± 1.18h/day (P < 0.001) for PPM patients and 0.51 ± 1.2h/day (P < 0.001) for ICD patients. Stratification of subjects by active time (< 2 versus ≥ 2h/day) showed patients with < 2h, particularly those with ICDs, had modestly greater activity reductions with the pandemic onset. Logistical regression analyses suggest a trend toward a greater reduction in active time at the onset of the pandemic and an increased risk of hospital or emergency department (ED) admission for PPM patients, but not ICD patients.

Conclusion: The onset of the pandemic in the United States was associated with a significant drop in PPM and ICD patient active hours that was modestly more pronounced in less active patients and cannot be explained by one year of aging or seasonal variation. If sustained, these populations may experience excess cardiovascular morbidity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

COVID-19大流行的爆发减少了植入心脏装置患者的活动时间。
背景:缺乏身体活动和久坐行为是慢性病和全因死亡率的可改变危险因素,可能受到COVID-19关闭的负面影响。方法:回顾性收集332例永久起搏器(PPM)和244例植入式心脏除颤(ICD)患者6个时间点的加速度测量数据:2020年3月15日至5月15日(大流行期间)、2020年1月1日至3月14日、2019年10月1日至12月31日、2019年3月15日至5月15日、2019年1月1日至3月14日和2018年10月1日至12月31日。配对t检验采用Bonferroni校正,用于比较时间段。结果:与一年前相比,大流行期间活动显著减少,平均为0.53±1.18小时/天(P结论:美国大流行的发生与PPM和ICD患者活动时间的显著下降有关,这种下降在活动较少的患者中更为明显,不能用一年的年龄或季节变化来解释。如果持续下去,这些人群可能会出现过多的心血管发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信