From Individuals to Systems and Contributions to Creations: Novel Framework for Mapping the Efforts of Individuals by Convening The Center of Health and Health Care.

Q2 Medicine
Dana Lewis, Liz Salmi, Alicia Staley, John Harlow
{"title":"From Individuals to Systems and Contributions to Creations: Novel Framework for Mapping the Efforts of Individuals by Convening The Center of Health and Health Care.","authors":"Dana Lewis,&nbsp;Liz Salmi,&nbsp;Alicia Staley,&nbsp;John Harlow","doi":"10.2196/39339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with lived health care experiences (often referred to as \"patients\") are increasingly contributing to health care and are most effective when they are involved as partners who can contribute complementary knowledge alongside other stakeholders in health care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Convening The Center aimed to bring together \"people known as patients\"-the center of health care-to address priorities as they defined them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>According to the original project design, an in-person gathering was to be conducted; however, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the in-person gathering was transformed into a series of digital gatherings, including an in-depth interview phase, small-group gatherings, and a collective convening of 25 participants (22 women and 3 men from the United States, India, Costa Rica, Sweden, and Pakistan). Each participant was interviewed on Zoom (Zoom Video Communications Inc), and the interview data were thematically analyzed to design a subsequent small group and then full cohort Zoom sessions. Visual note-taking was used to reinforce a shared understanding of each individual- and group-level conversation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The interviews and gatherings for Convening The Center offered unique perspectives on patient activities in research, health innovation, and problem-solving. This project further developed a novel, two-spectrum framework for assessing different experiences that patients may have or seek to gain, based on what patients actually do, and different levels of patients' involvement, ranging from individual to community to systemic involvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The descriptors of patients in academic literature typically focus on what health care providers think patients \"are\" rather than on what patients \"do.\" The primary result of this project is a framework for mapping what patients \"do\" and \"where\" they do their work along two spectra: from creating their own projects to contributing to work initiated by others and from working at levels ranging from individual to community to systems. A better understanding of these spectra may enable researchers to more effectively engage and leverage patient expertise in health care research and innovation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e39339"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9672994/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Participatory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/39339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: People with lived health care experiences (often referred to as "patients") are increasingly contributing to health care and are most effective when they are involved as partners who can contribute complementary knowledge alongside other stakeholders in health care.

Objective: Convening The Center aimed to bring together "people known as patients"-the center of health care-to address priorities as they defined them.

Methods: According to the original project design, an in-person gathering was to be conducted; however, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the in-person gathering was transformed into a series of digital gatherings, including an in-depth interview phase, small-group gatherings, and a collective convening of 25 participants (22 women and 3 men from the United States, India, Costa Rica, Sweden, and Pakistan). Each participant was interviewed on Zoom (Zoom Video Communications Inc), and the interview data were thematically analyzed to design a subsequent small group and then full cohort Zoom sessions. Visual note-taking was used to reinforce a shared understanding of each individual- and group-level conversation.

Results: The interviews and gatherings for Convening The Center offered unique perspectives on patient activities in research, health innovation, and problem-solving. This project further developed a novel, two-spectrum framework for assessing different experiences that patients may have or seek to gain, based on what patients actually do, and different levels of patients' involvement, ranging from individual to community to systemic involvement.

Conclusions: The descriptors of patients in academic literature typically focus on what health care providers think patients "are" rather than on what patients "do." The primary result of this project is a framework for mapping what patients "do" and "where" they do their work along two spectra: from creating their own projects to contributing to work initiated by others and from working at levels ranging from individual to community to systems. A better understanding of these spectra may enable researchers to more effectively engage and leverage patient expertise in health care research and innovation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

从个人到系统和对创造的贡献:通过召集健康和卫生保健中心来绘制个人努力的新框架。
背景:有生活卫生保健经验的人(通常称为“患者”)对卫生保健的贡献越来越大,当他们作为伙伴参与进来,与卫生保健的其他利益攸关方一起贡献补充知识时,他们的作用是最有效的。目标:召集该中心旨在将“被称为患者的人”——医疗保健的中心——聚集在一起,根据他们的定义来解决优先事项。方法:按照原项目设计,进行现场聚会;然而,由于2019冠状病毒病大流行,面对面的聚会转变为一系列数字聚会,包括深度访谈阶段、小组聚会和25名与会者的集体会议(来自美国、印度、哥斯达黎加、瑞典和巴基斯坦的22名女性和3名男性)。每个参与者都在Zoom (Zoom视频通信公司)上接受了采访,并对采访数据进行了主题分析,以设计随后的小群体,然后是全队列Zoom会话。视觉笔记被用来加强对每个个人和小组级别对话的共同理解。结果:召集中心的访谈和聚会为研究、健康创新和解决问题的患者活动提供了独特的视角。该项目进一步开发了一种新的双谱框架,用于评估患者可能拥有或寻求获得的不同体验,该框架基于患者实际做了什么,以及患者参与的不同程度,从个人到社区再到系统参与。结论:学术文献中对患者的描述通常侧重于医疗保健提供者认为患者“是”什么,而不是患者“做”什么。该项目的主要成果是一个框架,用于绘制患者在两个方面“做”什么和“在哪里”工作:从创建自己的项目到为他人发起的工作做出贡献,以及从个人到社区到系统的各个层面的工作。更好地了解这些光谱可以使研究人员更有效地参与和利用医疗保健研究和创新中的患者专业知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Participatory Medicine
Journal of Participatory Medicine Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信