Contribution of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate to Predict Disease Severity and Outcome in COVID-19 Patients.

IF 2.6
Celali Kurt, Arzu Altunçeki Ç Yildirim
{"title":"Contribution of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate to Predict Disease Severity and Outcome in COVID-19 Patients.","authors":"Celali Kurt, Arzu Altunçeki Ç Yildirim","doi":"10.1155/2022/6510952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to determine disease severity and prognosis is limited. This study aimed to interrogate the diagnostic and prognostic role of ESR compared to other acute-phase reactants.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study included 493 confirmed and hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients. Pneumonia, radiological severity, oxygen, intensive care requirements, mortality, ESR, and other acute-phase reactant values were recorded. Logistic regression and ROC analysis identified the effect of ESR on mortality and the sensitivity and specificity of the optimal cutoff values of ESR for the prediction of pneumonia, intensive care needs, and mortality and compared these with values for CRP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of patients, 346 (70.2%) had pneumonia, 98 (19.9%) required intensive care, 183 (37.1%) required oxygen support, and 62 (12.6%) died. ESR data were obtained for 278 patients. Among patients, 80.2% had ESR above 20 mm/h, with a median value of 53 (interquartile range: 49). ESR was higher among those with pneumonia (<i>p</i> < 0.001), requiring oxygen (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and requiring intensive care (<i>p</i>=0.003) compared to those without these, and in exitus patients (<i>p</i>=0.043) compared to survivors. Logistic regression analysis identified that ESR did not impact mortality. ROC analysis found the AUC, cutoff, sensitivity, and specificity results of ESR for pneumonia were 0.827, 37 mm/h, 77%, and 78%; for intensive care were 0.625, 50 mm/h, 74%, and 52; and for mortality were 0.606, 51 mm/h, 71%, and 49%, respectively. However, ROC analysis values for CRP were superior to ESR for all these categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESR increased in COVID-19 patients in the presence of pneumonia and severe disease; however, it was not prognostic. Sensitivity and specificity values for pneumonia, intensive care requirements, and mortality were lower than those for CRP.</p>","PeriodicalId":520793,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale","volume":" ","pages":"6510952"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9388309/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6510952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The use of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to determine disease severity and prognosis is limited. This study aimed to interrogate the diagnostic and prognostic role of ESR compared to other acute-phase reactants.

Method: This retrospective cross-sectional study included 493 confirmed and hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients. Pneumonia, radiological severity, oxygen, intensive care requirements, mortality, ESR, and other acute-phase reactant values were recorded. Logistic regression and ROC analysis identified the effect of ESR on mortality and the sensitivity and specificity of the optimal cutoff values of ESR for the prediction of pneumonia, intensive care needs, and mortality and compared these with values for CRP.

Results: Of patients, 346 (70.2%) had pneumonia, 98 (19.9%) required intensive care, 183 (37.1%) required oxygen support, and 62 (12.6%) died. ESR data were obtained for 278 patients. Among patients, 80.2% had ESR above 20 mm/h, with a median value of 53 (interquartile range: 49). ESR was higher among those with pneumonia (p < 0.001), requiring oxygen (p < 0.001), and requiring intensive care (p=0.003) compared to those without these, and in exitus patients (p=0.043) compared to survivors. Logistic regression analysis identified that ESR did not impact mortality. ROC analysis found the AUC, cutoff, sensitivity, and specificity results of ESR for pneumonia were 0.827, 37 mm/h, 77%, and 78%; for intensive care were 0.625, 50 mm/h, 74%, and 52; and for mortality were 0.606, 51 mm/h, 71%, and 49%, respectively. However, ROC analysis values for CRP were superior to ESR for all these categories.

Conclusion: ESR increased in COVID-19 patients in the presence of pneumonia and severe disease; however, it was not prognostic. Sensitivity and specificity values for pneumonia, intensive care requirements, and mortality were lower than those for CRP.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

红细胞沉降率对预测COVID-19患者疾病严重程度和预后的贡献
目的:利用红细胞沉降率(ESR)在冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)中判断疾病严重程度和预后的局限性。本研究旨在探讨与其他急性期反应物相比,ESR的诊断和预后作用。方法:回顾性横断面研究纳入493例确诊和住院的成人COVID-19患者。记录肺炎、放射严重程度、氧气、重症监护要求、死亡率、ESR和其他急性期反应物值。Logistic回归和ROC分析确定了ESR对死亡率的影响,以及ESR预测肺炎、重症监护需求和死亡率的最佳临界值的敏感性和特异性,并将其与CRP值进行比较。结果:346例(70.2%)患者发生肺炎,98例(19.9%)需要重症监护,183例(37.1%)需要氧气支持,62例(12.6%)死亡。278例患者获得了ESR数据。在患者中,80.2%的ESR高于20 mm/h,中位数为53(四分位数间距:49)。肺炎患者(p < 0.001)、需要吸氧(p < 0.001)和需要重症监护(p=0.003)的ESR高于没有这些症状的患者,急性期患者(p=0.043)高于幸存者。Logistic回归分析确定ESR不影响死亡率。ROC分析发现,ESR诊断肺炎的AUC、临界值、敏感性和特异性结果分别为0.827、37 mm/h、77%和78%;重症监护组分别为0.625、50 mm/h、74%和52;死亡率分别为0.606、51 mm/h、71%和49%。然而,在所有这些类别中,CRP的ROC分析值都优于ESR。结论:新冠肺炎合并重症患者ESR升高;然而,这并不是预测。肺炎、重症监护要求和死亡率的敏感性和特异性值低于CRP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书