Identifying optimal therapies in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Translational gastroenterology and hepatology Pub Date : 2022-10-25 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.21037/tgh-20-318
Zhenyu Yang, Yao Tong, Lin Yang, Xianli He, Guoqiang Bao, Xilin Du
{"title":"Identifying optimal therapies in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Zhenyu Yang,&nbsp;Yao Tong,&nbsp;Lin Yang,&nbsp;Xianli He,&nbsp;Guoqiang Bao,&nbsp;Xilin Du","doi":"10.21037/tgh-20-318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently, increasing literature has been reported on optimal therapies in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and many therapeutic modalities have been proposed to improve the survival rate. However, the results are not consistent due to different research protocols, small sample sizes and different study endpoints and there is no standard treatment protocol has been defined. Therefore, it is very important to explore the optimal bonding mode and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the optimal sequential therapy for those patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched available databases through January 2020 for relevant studies. The main outcome measure was 1-year overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR); the secondary outcome measure was a composite of toxic effects retrieved grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) from all included studies. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA version 15 and GeMTC package in the R statistical software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a detailed review, 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 20 retrospective studies involving 3,675 advanced HCC patients were included for network meta-analysis. Indirect comparisons showed that hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) plus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was highest probability of obtaining the best OS rate of 1 year [surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA), 0.95] and ORR (SUCRA, 0.86) when compared with other potential optimal therapies and which had ranked the first in all treatment regimens, followed by HAIC (SUCRA, 0.75). Direct and indirect comparison of 1-year OS and ORR with all treatment regimens each other showed that for all treatment regimens, patients showed significant clinical benefit when compared with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or sorafenib alone. However, the incidence of treatment-related AEs of grade 3 or 4 occurred in patients who have received targeted drug sorafenib therapy (SUCRA, 0.51) compared with other interesting regimens.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HAIC may be a valuable therapeutic strategy for advanced HCC patients to prevent recurrence and metastasis after RFA, as well as in improving patient prognosis and quality of life. Meanwhile, HAIC combined with RFA is a safe and effective treatment in patients with advanced HCC, and this combination therapy can significantly prolong 1-year survival rate when compared with other optimal sequential therapies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020176149.</p>","PeriodicalId":23267,"journal":{"name":"Translational gastroenterology and hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/49/6e/tgh-07-20-318.PMC9468989.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational gastroenterology and hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh-20-318","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Recently, increasing literature has been reported on optimal therapies in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and many therapeutic modalities have been proposed to improve the survival rate. However, the results are not consistent due to different research protocols, small sample sizes and different study endpoints and there is no standard treatment protocol has been defined. Therefore, it is very important to explore the optimal bonding mode and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the optimal sequential therapy for those patients.

Methods: We searched available databases through January 2020 for relevant studies. The main outcome measure was 1-year overall survival (OS) and overall response rate (ORR); the secondary outcome measure was a composite of toxic effects retrieved grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) from all included studies. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA version 15 and GeMTC package in the R statistical software.

Results: After a detailed review, 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 20 retrospective studies involving 3,675 advanced HCC patients were included for network meta-analysis. Indirect comparisons showed that hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) plus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was highest probability of obtaining the best OS rate of 1 year [surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA), 0.95] and ORR (SUCRA, 0.86) when compared with other potential optimal therapies and which had ranked the first in all treatment regimens, followed by HAIC (SUCRA, 0.75). Direct and indirect comparison of 1-year OS and ORR with all treatment regimens each other showed that for all treatment regimens, patients showed significant clinical benefit when compared with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or sorafenib alone. However, the incidence of treatment-related AEs of grade 3 or 4 occurred in patients who have received targeted drug sorafenib therapy (SUCRA, 0.51) compared with other interesting regimens.

Conclusions: HAIC may be a valuable therapeutic strategy for advanced HCC patients to prevent recurrence and metastasis after RFA, as well as in improving patient prognosis and quality of life. Meanwhile, HAIC combined with RFA is a safe and effective treatment in patients with advanced HCC, and this combination therapy can significantly prolong 1-year survival rate when compared with other optimal sequential therapies.

Trial registration: This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42020176149.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

确定晚期肝细胞癌患者的最佳治疗方法:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。
背景:近年来,越来越多的文献报道了晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的最佳治疗方法,并提出了许多治疗方法来提高生存率。然而,由于研究方案不同,样本量小,研究终点不同,且没有标准的治疗方案,结果并不一致。因此,探索最佳的结合模式,评估最佳序贯治疗对这些患者的疗效和安全性是非常重要的。方法:我们检索了截至2020年1月的可用数据库,以获取相关研究。主要结局指标为1年总生存期(OS)和总缓解率(ORR);次要结局指标是从所有纳入的研究中检索到的3级或4级不良事件(ae)的毒性效应的综合。采用R统计软件中的STATA version 15和GeMTC包进行统计分析。结果:经过详细回顾,纳入8项随机对照试验(rct)和20项回顾性研究,涉及3,675例晚期HCC患者,进行网络meta分析。间接比较显示,肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC) +射频消融(RFA)与其他潜在的最佳治疗方法相比,获得1年最佳OS率的概率最高[表面下累积排名(SUCRA), 0.95]和ORR (SUCRA, 0.86),在所有治疗方案中排名第一,其次是HAIC (SUCRA, 0.75)。直接和间接比较所有治疗方案的1年OS和ORR均显示,与经导管动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)或单独使用索拉非尼相比,对于所有治疗方案,患者均表现出显著的临床获益。然而,与其他有趣的方案相比,接受靶向药物索拉非尼治疗的患者发生3级或4级治疗相关不良事件(SUCRA, 0.51)。结论:HAIC可能是一种有价值的治疗策略,可预防晚期HCC患者RFA后复发和转移,改善患者预后和生活质量。同时,HAIC联合RFA治疗晚期HCC是一种安全有效的治疗方法,与其他最佳序期治疗相比,该联合治疗可显著延长1年生存率。试验注册:本研究已在PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD42020176149。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol; TGH; Online ISSN 2415-1289) is an open-access, peer-reviewed online journal that focuses on cutting-edge findings in the field of translational research in gastroenterology and hepatology and provides current and practical information on diagnosis, prevention and clinical investigations of gastrointestinal, pancreas, gallbladder and hepatic diseases. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, biomarkers, imaging, biology, pathology, and technical advances related to gastrointestinal and hepatic diseases. Contributions pertinent to gastroenterology and hepatology are also included from related fields such as nutrition, surgery, public health, human genetics, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信