Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.

IF 3 4区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Translational gastroenterology and hepatology Pub Date : 2022-10-25 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.21037/tgh-19-297
Rajanshu Verma, Sanjaya K Satapathy, Muhammad Bilal
{"title":"Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.","authors":"Rajanshu Verma,&nbsp;Sanjaya K Satapathy,&nbsp;Muhammad Bilal","doi":"10.21037/tgh-19-297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a serious complication of cirrhosis and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Rapid institution of appropriate antibiotics is central to the improved patient outcome. Correctly obtaining ascites fluid for analysis has several technical and logistic limitations resulting in overuse of empiric antibiotics when patients are admitted to the hospital with suspected SBP. Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein (CRP) are non-invasive markers of infection. We conducted a study to illustrate the role of these markers in making the diagnosis of SBP in patients with cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 45 patients were enrolled in this prospective cohort study, 14 (31.1%) of which were found to have SBP. Ascitic fluid neutrophils, serum procalcitonin and CRP levels were measured prior to initiation of antibiotics and these parameters were compared between the two groups. Area under receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curves were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin and CRP in this population. We defined neutrocytic SBP group as a combination of patients who had classic SBP (positive ascitic culture and >250 neutrophils/mm<sup>3</sup>) and culture-negative neutrocytic ascites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serum procalcitonin (2.81±2.59 <i>vs.</i> 0.43±0.48 ng/mL; P=0.0032), serum CRP (60.30±44.48 <i>vs.</i> 22.2±23.28; P=0.0055) and ascitic fluid neutrophil levels (49.23±30.90 <i>vs.</i> 16.7±20.39; P=0.0064) were significantly higher in SBP group than non-SBP group. AUROC for procalcitonin (cut-off >2.0 ng/mL) was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.61-0.88), CRP (cut-off >3.0 mg/L) was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.43-0.68) and for procalcitonin combined with CRP was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.61-0.90) for diagnosing all-cause SBP. In a subgroup analysis of patients with neutrocytic SBP, AUROC for procalcitonin was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.74-1.00), CRP was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.45-0.79) and for procalcitonin combined with CRP was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.81-1.00). Addition of CRP to procalcitonin did not significantly change the AUROC for diagnosis of SBP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Serum procalcitonin could be used as an adjunctive non-invasive biomarker in diagnosing SBP with a high degree of accuracy in cirrhotic patients. Addition of CRP does not seem to significantly increase the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin.</p>","PeriodicalId":23267,"journal":{"name":"Translational gastroenterology and hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6a/e5/tgh-07-19-297.PMC9468983.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational gastroenterology and hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh-19-297","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a serious complication of cirrhosis and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Rapid institution of appropriate antibiotics is central to the improved patient outcome. Correctly obtaining ascites fluid for analysis has several technical and logistic limitations resulting in overuse of empiric antibiotics when patients are admitted to the hospital with suspected SBP. Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein (CRP) are non-invasive markers of infection. We conducted a study to illustrate the role of these markers in making the diagnosis of SBP in patients with cirrhosis.

Methods: A total of 45 patients were enrolled in this prospective cohort study, 14 (31.1%) of which were found to have SBP. Ascitic fluid neutrophils, serum procalcitonin and CRP levels were measured prior to initiation of antibiotics and these parameters were compared between the two groups. Area under receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curves were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin and CRP in this population. We defined neutrocytic SBP group as a combination of patients who had classic SBP (positive ascitic culture and >250 neutrophils/mm3) and culture-negative neutrocytic ascites.

Results: Serum procalcitonin (2.81±2.59 vs. 0.43±0.48 ng/mL; P=0.0032), serum CRP (60.30±44.48 vs. 22.2±23.28; P=0.0055) and ascitic fluid neutrophil levels (49.23±30.90 vs. 16.7±20.39; P=0.0064) were significantly higher in SBP group than non-SBP group. AUROC for procalcitonin (cut-off >2.0 ng/mL) was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.61-0.88), CRP (cut-off >3.0 mg/L) was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.43-0.68) and for procalcitonin combined with CRP was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.61-0.90) for diagnosing all-cause SBP. In a subgroup analysis of patients with neutrocytic SBP, AUROC for procalcitonin was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.74-1.00), CRP was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.45-0.79) and for procalcitonin combined with CRP was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.81-1.00). Addition of CRP to procalcitonin did not significantly change the AUROC for diagnosis of SBP.

Conclusions: Serum procalcitonin could be used as an adjunctive non-invasive biomarker in diagnosing SBP with a high degree of accuracy in cirrhotic patients. Addition of CRP does not seem to significantly increase the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

降钙素原和c反应蛋白在自发性细菌性腹膜炎中的诊断价值。
背景:自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)是肝硬化的严重并发症,具有很高的发病率和死亡率。迅速使用适当的抗生素是改善患者预后的关键。正确获取腹水进行分析存在一些技术和后勤限制,导致当怀疑收缩压的患者入院时过度使用经验性抗生素。降钙素原和c反应蛋白(CRP)是感染的非侵入性标志物。我们进行了一项研究,以说明这些标志物在肝硬化患者的收缩压诊断中的作用。方法:这项前瞻性队列研究共纳入45例患者,其中14例(31.1%)发现有收缩压。在开始使用抗生素之前测量腹水中性粒细胞、血清降钙素原和CRP水平,并比较两组之间的这些参数。使用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)来评估该人群中降钙素原和CRP的诊断准确性。我们将中性细胞性收缩压组定义为经典收缩压(腹水培养阳性且中性粒细胞/mm3 >250)和培养阴性的中性细胞性腹水患者的组合。结果:血清降钙素原(2.81±2.59∶0.43±0.48)ng/mL;P=0.0032),血清CRP(60.30±44.48∶22.2±23.28;P=0.0055)和腹水中性粒细胞水平(49.23±30.90∶16.7±20.39;P=0.0064),收缩压组明显高于非收缩压组。降钙素原(临界值>2.0 ng/mL)的AUROC为0.75 (95% CI, 0.61-0.88), CRP(临界值>3.0 mg/L)为0.55 (95% CI, 0.43-0.68),降钙素原联合CRP诊断全因收缩压的AUROC为0.76 (95% CI, 0.61-0.90)。在中性粒细胞性收缩压患者的亚组分析中,降钙素原的AUROC为0.88 (95% CI, 0.74-1.00), CRP为0.62 (95% CI, 0.45-0.79),降钙素原联合CRP为0.93 (95% CI, 0.81-1.00)。在降钙素原的基础上添加CRP对诊断收缩压的AUROC无显著影响。结论:血清降钙素原可作为诊断肝硬化患者收缩压的辅助无创生物标志物,具有较高的准确性。添加CRP似乎不能显著提高降钙素原的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol; TGH; Online ISSN 2415-1289) is an open-access, peer-reviewed online journal that focuses on cutting-edge findings in the field of translational research in gastroenterology and hepatology and provides current and practical information on diagnosis, prevention and clinical investigations of gastrointestinal, pancreas, gallbladder and hepatic diseases. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, biomarkers, imaging, biology, pathology, and technical advances related to gastrointestinal and hepatic diseases. Contributions pertinent to gastroenterology and hepatology are also included from related fields such as nutrition, surgery, public health, human genetics, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信