Long-term prognosis after a first myocardial infarction: eight years follow up of the case-control study PAROKRANK.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Giulia Ferrannini, Mariam Almosawi, Kåre Buhlin, Ulf De Faire, Barbro Kjellström, Björn Klinge, Åke Nygren, Per Näsman, Elisabet Svenungsson, Lars Rydén, Anna Norhammar
{"title":"Long-term prognosis after a first myocardial infarction: eight years follow up of the case-control study PAROKRANK.","authors":"Giulia Ferrannini,&nbsp;Mariam Almosawi,&nbsp;Kåre Buhlin,&nbsp;Ulf De Faire,&nbsp;Barbro Kjellström,&nbsp;Björn Klinge,&nbsp;Åke Nygren,&nbsp;Per Näsman,&nbsp;Elisabet Svenungsson,&nbsp;Lars Rydén,&nbsp;Anna Norhammar","doi":"10.1080/14017431.2022.2112072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i> To explore long-term cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients after a first myocardial infarction (MI) compared with matched controls in a contemporary setting. <i>Methods</i>. During 2010-2014 the Swedish study PAROKRANK recruited 805 patients <75 years with a first MI and 805 age-, gender-, and area-matched controls. All study participants were followed until 31 December 2018, through linkage with the National Patient Registry and the Cause of Death Registry. The primary endpoint was the first of a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, and heart failure hospitalization. Event rates in cases and controls were calculated using a Cox regression model, subsequently adjusted for baseline smoking, education level, and marital status. Kaplan-Meier curves were computed and compared by log-rank test. <i>Results</i>. A total of 804 patients and 800 controls (mean age 62 years; women 19%) were followed for a mean of 6.2 (0.2-8.5) years. The total number of primary events was 211. Patients had a higher event rate than controls (log-rank test <i>p</i> < .0001). Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the primary outcome was 2.04 (95% CI 1.52-2.73). Mortality did not differ between patients (<i>n</i> = 38; 4.7%) and controls (<i>n</i> = 35; 4.4%). A total of 82.5% patients and 91.3% controls were event-free during the follow up. <i>Conclusions</i>. In this long-term follow up of a contemporary, case-control study, the risk for cardiovascular events was higher in patients with a previous first MI compared with their matched controls, while mortality did not differ. The access to high quality of care and cardiac rehabilitation might partly explain the low rates of adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21383,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2022.2112072","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. To explore long-term cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients after a first myocardial infarction (MI) compared with matched controls in a contemporary setting. Methods. During 2010-2014 the Swedish study PAROKRANK recruited 805 patients <75 years with a first MI and 805 age-, gender-, and area-matched controls. All study participants were followed until 31 December 2018, through linkage with the National Patient Registry and the Cause of Death Registry. The primary endpoint was the first of a composite of all-cause death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, and heart failure hospitalization. Event rates in cases and controls were calculated using a Cox regression model, subsequently adjusted for baseline smoking, education level, and marital status. Kaplan-Meier curves were computed and compared by log-rank test. Results. A total of 804 patients and 800 controls (mean age 62 years; women 19%) were followed for a mean of 6.2 (0.2-8.5) years. The total number of primary events was 211. Patients had a higher event rate than controls (log-rank test p < .0001). Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for the primary outcome was 2.04 (95% CI 1.52-2.73). Mortality did not differ between patients (n = 38; 4.7%) and controls (n = 35; 4.4%). A total of 82.5% patients and 91.3% controls were event-free during the follow up. Conclusions. In this long-term follow up of a contemporary, case-control study, the risk for cardiovascular events was higher in patients with a previous first MI compared with their matched controls, while mortality did not differ. The access to high quality of care and cardiac rehabilitation might partly explain the low rates of adverse outcomes.

首次心肌梗死后的长期预后:PAROKRANK病例对照研究的8年随访。
目标。在当代背景下,探讨首次心肌梗死(MI)后患者的长期心血管结局和死亡率与匹配对照组的比较。方法。2010-2014年期间,瑞典研究PAROKRANK招募了805名患者。共804例患者和800例对照(平均年龄62岁;女性(19%)平均随访6.2年(0.2-8.5年)。主要事件总数为211个。患者的事件发生率高于对照组(log-rank检验p n = 38;4.7%)和对照组(n = 35;4.4%)。在随访期间,共有82.5%的患者和91.3%的对照组无事件发生。结论。在一项当代病例对照研究的长期随访中,与匹配的对照组相比,先前首次心肌梗死患者的心血管事件风险更高,但死亡率没有差异。获得高质量的护理和心脏康复可能部分解释了不良后果发生率低的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The principal aim of Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal is to promote cardiovascular research that crosses the borders between disciplines. The journal is a forum for the entire field of cardiovascular research, basic and clinical including: • Cardiology - Interventional and non-invasive • Cardiovascular epidemiology • Cardiovascular anaesthesia and intensive care • Cardiovascular surgery • Cardiovascular radiology • Clinical physiology • Transplantation of thoracic organs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信