Value of diffusion MRI versus [18F]FDG PET/CT in detection of cervical nodal metastases in differentiated thyroid cancer patients.

IF 0.6 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ahmed M Shalash, Mai Amr Elahmadawy, Samia Y Heikal, Ayman A Amin, Ayda A Youssef
{"title":"Value of diffusion MRI versus [18F]FDG PET/CT in detection of cervical nodal metastases in differentiated thyroid cancer patients.","authors":"Ahmed M Shalash,&nbsp;Mai Amr Elahmadawy,&nbsp;Samia Y Heikal,&nbsp;Ayman A Amin,&nbsp;Ayda A Youssef","doi":"10.5603/NMR.a2022.0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients, cervical nodal metastasis is a negative prognostic factor. Preoperative imaging plays an important role in treatment planning for nodal metastasis and recurrence. The aim of the study is to compare the diagnostic performance of the diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and the F-18 flurodeoxyglucose positron emission computed tomography ([18F]FDG PET/CT) in detection of cervical nodal deposits in DTC patients.</p><p><strong>Materal and methods: </strong>The study was conducted on 30 patients, each performed both modalities just before the surgery. The gold standard was the pathological specimens with post-operative clinico-radiological follow-up, to assess the diagnostic performance of each modality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on pathological and post-operative clinico-radiological follow up data. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV) and accuracy were 84%, 80%, 50%, 95% and 83% for PET/CT compared to 84%, 60%, 42.8%, 91.3% and 80% for DW-MRI. On comparing the diagnostic performance of combined DW-MRI and PET/CT to each modality alone, the sensitivity and NPV were improved to 96% and 80% respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>[18F]FDG PET/CT study is a valuable diagnostic modality for the assessment of cervical nodal deposits in DTC patients, surpassing DW-MRI. Combined PET/CT and DW-MRI techniques seemed to have synergistic performance, mainly in terms of sensitivity and NPV, for detection of nodal metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":44718,"journal":{"name":"NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/NMR.a2022.0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients, cervical nodal metastasis is a negative prognostic factor. Preoperative imaging plays an important role in treatment planning for nodal metastasis and recurrence. The aim of the study is to compare the diagnostic performance of the diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and the F-18 flurodeoxyglucose positron emission computed tomography ([18F]FDG PET/CT) in detection of cervical nodal deposits in DTC patients.

Materal and methods: The study was conducted on 30 patients, each performed both modalities just before the surgery. The gold standard was the pathological specimens with post-operative clinico-radiological follow-up, to assess the diagnostic performance of each modality.

Results: Based on pathological and post-operative clinico-radiological follow up data. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV) and accuracy were 84%, 80%, 50%, 95% and 83% for PET/CT compared to 84%, 60%, 42.8%, 91.3% and 80% for DW-MRI. On comparing the diagnostic performance of combined DW-MRI and PET/CT to each modality alone, the sensitivity and NPV were improved to 96% and 80% respectively.

Conclusions: [18F]FDG PET/CT study is a valuable diagnostic modality for the assessment of cervical nodal deposits in DTC patients, surpassing DW-MRI. Combined PET/CT and DW-MRI techniques seemed to have synergistic performance, mainly in terms of sensitivity and NPV, for detection of nodal metastases.

弥散MRI与[18F]FDG PET/CT在鉴别分化型甲状腺癌患者宫颈淋巴结转移中的价值
背景:在分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)患者中,宫颈淋巴结转移是一个不良预后因素。术前影像学检查在淋巴结转移和复发的治疗方案中起着重要的作用。本研究的目的是比较弥散加权磁共振成像(DW-MRI)和F-18氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射计算机断层扫描([18F]FDG PET/CT)对DTC患者宫颈淋巴结沉积的诊断性能。材料和方法:本研究对30例患者进行了研究,每位患者在手术前都进行了两种方式的治疗。金标准是术后临床放射学随访的病理标本,评估各模式的诊断效果。结果:基于病理和术后临床放射学随访资料。PET/CT的敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值(NPV)、阳性预测值(PPV)和准确性分别为84%、80%、50%、95%和83%,DW-MRI的敏感性、特异性、阴性预测值(NPV)、阳性预测值(PPV)和准确性分别为84%、60%、42.8%、91.3%和80%。将DW-MRI与PET/CT联合诊断与单独诊断进行比较,其敏感性和NPV分别提高到96%和80%。结论:[18F]FDG PET/CT研究是评估DTC患者宫颈淋巴结沉积的一种有价值的诊断方式,超过了DW-MRI。PET/CT和DW-MRI联合技术似乎具有协同性能,主要是在检测淋巴结转移的敏感性和NPV方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW
NUCLEAR MEDICINE REVIEW RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Written in English, NMR is a biannual international periodical of scientific and educational profile. It is a journal of Bulgarian, Czech, Hungarian, Macedonian, Polish, Romanian, Russian, Slovak, Ukrainian and Yugoslav Societies of Nuclear Medicine. The periodical focuses on all nuclear medicine topics (diagnostics as well as therapy), and presents original experimental scientific papers, reviews, case studies, letters also news about symposia and congresses. NMR is indexed at Index Copernicus (7.41), Scopus, EMBASE, Index Medicus/Medline, Ministry of Education 2007 (4 pts.).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信