Differences in acute stress responses depending on first or second language in a Hispanic-American sample.

Felicitas Hauck, Lucía Romero Gibu, Silke Jansen, Nicolas Rohleder
{"title":"Differences in acute stress responses depending on first or second language in a Hispanic-American sample.","authors":"Felicitas Hauck,&nbsp;Lucía Romero Gibu,&nbsp;Silke Jansen,&nbsp;Nicolas Rohleder","doi":"10.1080/10253890.2022.2110466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using a second language is a daily experience for many people today, among them many migrants. To determine whether speaking a second language induces a stronger cortisol or alpha-amylase (sAA) response than first language, we tested a Hispanic-American sample in two Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) conditions: First (Spanish) and second (German) language. Thirty-two participants (64.5% female) between the age of 19 and 53 years (mean = 30.68) from Latin America were tested (15 in Spanish, 17 in German). Participants were randomized to a German or Spanish version of the TSST, gave six saliva samples and completed questionnaires on perceived threat and stress, positive and negative affect as well as state-anxiety. A significantly higher stress response was found in the German condition for salivary cortisol, but not for sAA. Self-report showed significantly higher perceived threat and negative affect after the TSST for the German compared to the first language condition. Speaking a second compared to first language in a challenging situation appeared to be more stressful and threatening for participants. Further, reported increases in state-anxiety appeared to be higher in the German condition, even though group differences did not reach significance. A more detailed investigation of underlying, stress inducing mechanisms should be considered in future studies as well as associations with language proficiency and improvements over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":141741,"journal":{"name":"Stress (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":" ","pages":"313-322"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10253890.2022.2110466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Using a second language is a daily experience for many people today, among them many migrants. To determine whether speaking a second language induces a stronger cortisol or alpha-amylase (sAA) response than first language, we tested a Hispanic-American sample in two Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) conditions: First (Spanish) and second (German) language. Thirty-two participants (64.5% female) between the age of 19 and 53 years (mean = 30.68) from Latin America were tested (15 in Spanish, 17 in German). Participants were randomized to a German or Spanish version of the TSST, gave six saliva samples and completed questionnaires on perceived threat and stress, positive and negative affect as well as state-anxiety. A significantly higher stress response was found in the German condition for salivary cortisol, but not for sAA. Self-report showed significantly higher perceived threat and negative affect after the TSST for the German compared to the first language condition. Speaking a second compared to first language in a challenging situation appeared to be more stressful and threatening for participants. Further, reported increases in state-anxiety appeared to be higher in the German condition, even though group differences did not reach significance. A more detailed investigation of underlying, stress inducing mechanisms should be considered in future studies as well as associations with language proficiency and improvements over time.

急性应激反应的差异取决于第一或第二语言在西班牙裔美国人的样本。
今天,使用第二语言是许多人的日常经历,其中包括许多移民。为了确定说第二语言是否会比说第一语言引起更强的皮质醇或α -淀粉酶(sAA)反应,我们在两种特里尔社会压力测试(TSST)条件下测试了一个西班牙裔美国人样本:第一(西班牙语)和第二(德语)语言。来自拉丁美洲的32名参与者(64.5%为女性)年龄在19至53岁之间(平均30.68岁)(西班牙语15人,德语17人)接受了测试。参与者被随机分配到德语或西班牙语版本的TSST中,提供6份唾液样本,并完成关于感知威胁和压力、积极和消极影响以及状态焦虑的问卷调查。在德国条件下,唾液皮质醇的应激反应明显更高,而sAA则没有。自我报告显示,与第一语言组相比,德语组在TSST后的感知威胁和负面影响显著增加。与说第一语言相比,在具有挑战性的情况下说第二语言对参与者来说似乎更有压力和威胁。此外,据报道,在德国的情况下,国家焦虑的增加似乎更高,尽管组间差异没有达到显著性。在未来的研究中,应该考虑对潜在的压力诱导机制进行更详细的调查,以及与语言熟练程度和随着时间的推移而提高的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信