The effectiveness of aromatherapy and reflexology in neurodegenerative disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurodegenerative disease management Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-30 DOI:10.2217/nmt-2021-0056
Raj Rawal, Joy Read, Elizabeth Chesterman, Kate Walters, Anette Schrag, Gareth Ambler, Megan Armstrong
{"title":"The effectiveness of aromatherapy and reflexology in neurodegenerative disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Raj Rawal,&nbsp;Joy Read,&nbsp;Elizabeth Chesterman,&nbsp;Kate Walters,&nbsp;Anette Schrag,&nbsp;Gareth Ambler,&nbsp;Megan Armstrong","doi":"10.2217/nmt-2021-0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many neurodegenerative conditions are chronic disorders and result in a range of debilitating symptoms, with many people turning to complementary therapies. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to investigate the evidence on effectiveness of aromatherapy and reflexology on all neurodegenerative conditions. We identified nine eligible studies (total sample n = 504 participants) all of which were on multiple sclerosis only. A meta-analysis was conducted including data from six studies, which demonstrated no significant benefit of aromatherapy/reflexology; however, the sample sizes were small and of low quality. This systematic review confirmed that it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding the effectiveness of reflexology and aromatherapy in multiple sclerosis. Larger high-quality studies are required to test these widely used therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19114,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative disease management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurodegenerative disease management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt-2021-0056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Many neurodegenerative conditions are chronic disorders and result in a range of debilitating symptoms, with many people turning to complementary therapies. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to investigate the evidence on effectiveness of aromatherapy and reflexology on all neurodegenerative conditions. We identified nine eligible studies (total sample n = 504 participants) all of which were on multiple sclerosis only. A meta-analysis was conducted including data from six studies, which demonstrated no significant benefit of aromatherapy/reflexology; however, the sample sizes were small and of low quality. This systematic review confirmed that it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding the effectiveness of reflexology and aromatherapy in multiple sclerosis. Larger high-quality studies are required to test these widely used therapies.

芳香疗法和反射疗法在神经退行性疾病中的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
许多神经退行性疾病是慢性疾病,并导致一系列衰弱症状,许多人转向补充疗法。我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以调查芳香疗法和反射疗法对所有神经退行性疾病有效的证据。我们确定了9项符合条件的研究(总样本n = 504名参与者),所有这些研究均仅针对多发性硬化症。我们对六项研究的数据进行了荟萃分析,结果显示芳香疗法/反射疗法没有显著的益处;然而,样本量小,质量低。本系统综述证实,不可能得出关于反射疗法和芳香疗法在多发性硬化症中的有效性的结论。需要更大规模的高质量研究来测试这些广泛使用的疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信