Clinico-pathologic predictors of dismal course in atypical meningiomas: a retrospective single-centre analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of neurosurgical sciences Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-28 DOI:10.23736/S0390-5616.22.05741-1
Alice Ryba, Matthias Millesi, Thomas Roetzer, Wolfgang Marik, Stefan Wolfsberger
{"title":"Clinico-pathologic predictors of dismal course in atypical meningiomas: a retrospective single-centre analysis.","authors":"Alice Ryba, Matthias Millesi, Thomas Roetzer, Wolfgang Marik, Stefan Wolfsberger","doi":"10.23736/S0390-5616.22.05741-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite continuous refinement of the WHO Classification for meningiomas, the biological behavior of atypical meningiomas remains difficult to predict on the basis of this grading system alone. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of clinical and radiological parameters in a series of atypical meningioma with long follow-up of minimum 5 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of 1675 meningiomas treated at the Medical University Vienna (Austria) between 1993 and 2015, 179 were atypical meningioma. Of those, 93 patients were identified with follow-up of ≥5 years. Patients were grouped by recurrence and evaluated for overall and progression free survival as well as potential prognostic parameters such as age, gender, tumor size and location, edema, irregular surface, contrast enhancement, bone invasion and hyperostosis, necrosis, EOR and MIB-1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 42 (45%) patients in group recurrent and 51 (55%) patients in group non-recurrent, seven independent factors were associated with decreased progression-free survival in univariate analysis: size ≥5 cm, age ≥60 years, male gender, subtotal resection, irregular surface, and necrosis on magnetic resonance imaging, and MIB-1≥6%. In multivariable analysis, only larger size, older age, necrosis and higher MIB-1 remained independent prognostic risk factors for recurrence of atypical meningioma.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified larger size, older age, presence of necrosis on magnetic resonance imaging, and higher MIB-1, as detrimental parameters for recurrence of atypical meningioma. Until molecular profiling of atypical meningioma becomes routinely available, these parameters may aid the clinician in decision making about surveillance intervals and adjuvant radiation treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.22.05741-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite continuous refinement of the WHO Classification for meningiomas, the biological behavior of atypical meningiomas remains difficult to predict on the basis of this grading system alone. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of clinical and radiological parameters in a series of atypical meningioma with long follow-up of minimum 5 years.

Methods: Of 1675 meningiomas treated at the Medical University Vienna (Austria) between 1993 and 2015, 179 were atypical meningioma. Of those, 93 patients were identified with follow-up of ≥5 years. Patients were grouped by recurrence and evaluated for overall and progression free survival as well as potential prognostic parameters such as age, gender, tumor size and location, edema, irregular surface, contrast enhancement, bone invasion and hyperostosis, necrosis, EOR and MIB-1.

Results: From 42 (45%) patients in group recurrent and 51 (55%) patients in group non-recurrent, seven independent factors were associated with decreased progression-free survival in univariate analysis: size ≥5 cm, age ≥60 years, male gender, subtotal resection, irregular surface, and necrosis on magnetic resonance imaging, and MIB-1≥6%. In multivariable analysis, only larger size, older age, necrosis and higher MIB-1 remained independent prognostic risk factors for recurrence of atypical meningioma.

Conclusions: We identified larger size, older age, presence of necrosis on magnetic resonance imaging, and higher MIB-1, as detrimental parameters for recurrence of atypical meningioma. Until molecular profiling of atypical meningioma becomes routinely available, these parameters may aid the clinician in decision making about surveillance intervals and adjuvant radiation treatment.

非典型脑膜瘤不良病程的临床病理学预测因素:单中心回顾性分析。
背景:尽管世界卫生组织对脑膜瘤的分类不断完善,但仅凭这一分级系统仍难以预测非典型脑膜瘤的生物学行为。本研究的目的是调查一系列至少随访 5 年的非典型脑膜瘤的临床和放射学参数对预后的意义:1993年至2015年间,维也纳医科大学治疗了1675例脑膜瘤,其中179例为非典型脑膜瘤。其中,93名患者的随访时间≥5年。根据复发情况对患者进行分组,评估总生存期和无进展生存期以及潜在的预后参数,如年龄、性别、肿瘤大小和位置、水肿、不规则表面、对比度增强、骨侵犯和骨质增生、坏死、EOR和MIB-1:在单变量分析中,复发组的42例(45%)患者和非复发组的51例(55%)患者中,有7个独立因素与无进展生存率下降有关:肿瘤大小≥5厘米、年龄≥60岁、男性、次全切除、表面不规则、磁共振成像显示坏死和MIB-1≥6%。在多变量分析中,只有体积较大、年龄较大、坏死和较高的MIB-1仍是非典型脑膜瘤复发的独立预后风险因素:我们发现,体积较大、年龄较大、磁共振成像中出现坏死和较高的MIB-1是非典型脑膜瘤复发的不利参数。在非典型脑膜瘤的分子图谱分析成为常规方法之前,这些参数可能有助于临床医生做出监测间隔和辅助放射治疗的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgical sciences
Journal of neurosurgical sciences CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
202
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences publishes scientific papers on neurosurgery and related subjects (electroencephalography, neurophysiology, neurochemistry, neuropathology, stereotaxy, neuroanatomy, neuroradiology, etc.). Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of ditorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信