Collagen Deposition and Inflammatory Response Associated with Macroporous Mesh Shrinkage in Incisional Hernia Repair: A Rat Model.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Journal of Investigative Surgery Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-27 DOI:10.1080/08941939.2022.2087240
Peticha Tanprasert, Kanokkan Tepmalai, Bandhuphat Chakrabandhu, Supachai Yodkeeree, Wirawit Piyamongkol, Sirikan Limpakan Yamada
{"title":"Collagen Deposition and Inflammatory Response Associated with Macroporous Mesh Shrinkage in Incisional Hernia Repair: A Rat Model.","authors":"Peticha Tanprasert,&nbsp;Kanokkan Tepmalai,&nbsp;Bandhuphat Chakrabandhu,&nbsp;Supachai Yodkeeree,&nbsp;Wirawit Piyamongkol,&nbsp;Sirikan Limpakan Yamada","doi":"10.1080/08941939.2022.2087240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Mesh repair is the current recommendation for the treatment of incisional hernia; however, the best mesh has yet to be determined. The objective of this study was to compare the inflammatory response and collagen deposition in primary incisional hernia repair (P) and different macroporous mesh materials, including polypropylene with poliglecaprone (PP-PG), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), and polyester (PE), using quantitative methods. <b>Methods:</b> Sixty male rats were divided into four groups. Anterior abdominal wall defects were created and either suture or mesh repair was done. Rats were euthanized on days 14, 90, and 180, and the gross findings were recorded. The inflammatory and collagen levels in the abdominal wall tissues were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). <b>Results:</b> The PE group demonstrated significant mesh shrinkage at 180 days. The extent of PE mesh shrinkage ranged from 22-42% (mean = 30.49%). At 14 days, the PVDF group had higher interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels than the PP-PG (<i>P</i> = .004) and PE groups (<i>P</i> = .019). At 90 days, the collagen type I (Col I) levels in the PE group were significantly lower than those in the others, and the collagen type I/III (Col I/III) ratios in the PE group were lower than those in the <i>P</i> group (<i>P</i> = .006). <b>Conclusions:</b> The persistently high IL-6 levels until 180 days and the decrease in Col I levels and Col I/III ratio at 90 days seem to predict mesh shrinkage at 180 days. The mesh induces high Col I levels, but those associated with low Col III levels should be preferred.</p>","PeriodicalId":16200,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2022.2087240","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Mesh repair is the current recommendation for the treatment of incisional hernia; however, the best mesh has yet to be determined. The objective of this study was to compare the inflammatory response and collagen deposition in primary incisional hernia repair (P) and different macroporous mesh materials, including polypropylene with poliglecaprone (PP-PG), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), and polyester (PE), using quantitative methods. Methods: Sixty male rats were divided into four groups. Anterior abdominal wall defects were created and either suture or mesh repair was done. Rats were euthanized on days 14, 90, and 180, and the gross findings were recorded. The inflammatory and collagen levels in the abdominal wall tissues were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results: The PE group demonstrated significant mesh shrinkage at 180 days. The extent of PE mesh shrinkage ranged from 22-42% (mean = 30.49%). At 14 days, the PVDF group had higher interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels than the PP-PG (P = .004) and PE groups (P = .019). At 90 days, the collagen type I (Col I) levels in the PE group were significantly lower than those in the others, and the collagen type I/III (Col I/III) ratios in the PE group were lower than those in the P group (P = .006). Conclusions: The persistently high IL-6 levels until 180 days and the decrease in Col I levels and Col I/III ratio at 90 days seem to predict mesh shrinkage at 180 days. The mesh induces high Col I levels, but those associated with low Col III levels should be preferred.

大鼠模型:大孔补片收缩与切口疝修补中胶原沉积和炎症反应相关。
背景:补片修补术是目前推荐的治疗切口疝的方法;然而,最佳网格尚未确定。本研究的目的是通过定量方法比较不同大孔补片材料(聚丙烯与聚聚甲氨酮(PP-PG)、聚偏氟乙烯(PVDF)和聚酯(PE))在一期切口疝修补(P)中的炎症反应和胶原沉积。方法:雄性大鼠60只,随机分为4组。前腹壁缺损,采用缝合或补片修复。分别于第14、90、180天对大鼠实施安乐死,并记录大体结果。采用酶联免疫吸附法(ELISA)检测腹壁组织炎症和胶原蛋白水平。结果:PE组在180天出现明显的网状收缩。PE网收缩幅度为22-42%(平均为30.49%)。第14天,PVDF组白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)水平高于PP-PG组(P = 0.004)和PE组(P = 0.019)。90 d时,PE组ⅰ型胶原蛋白(Col I)水平显著低于其他组,且PE组ⅰ型/ⅲ型胶原蛋白(Col I/III)比值低于P组(P = 0.006)。结论:持续高IL-6水平直到180天,Col I水平和Col I/III比值在90天下降似乎预示着180天的补片收缩。网状物诱导高Col I水平,但与低Col III水平相关的应优先考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Surgery publishes peer-reviewed scientific articles for the advancement of surgery, to the ultimate benefit of patient care and rehabilitation. It is the only journal that encompasses the individual and collaborative efforts of scientists in human and veterinary medicine, dentistry, basic and applied sciences, engineering, and law and ethics. The journal is dedicated to the publication of outstanding articles of interest to the surgical research community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信