Assessment of Psychological Distress in Health Care Workers During the First two Waves of COVID-19: A Follow-up of a Canadian Longitudinal Study.

Q1 Psychology
Chronic Stress Pub Date : 2022-06-21 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1177/24705470221108144
Marie-Michèle Dufour, Nicolas Bergeron, Stéphane Guay, Steve Geoffrion
{"title":"Assessment of Psychological Distress in Health Care Workers During the First two Waves of COVID-19: A Follow-up of a Canadian Longitudinal Study.","authors":"Marie-Michèle Dufour,&nbsp;Nicolas Bergeron,&nbsp;Stéphane Guay,&nbsp;Steve Geoffrion","doi":"10.1177/24705470221108144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health care workers (HCW) exposed to COVID-19 risk experiencing psychological distress. Little is known regarding longitudinal perspectives and evolutions of psychological distress within this population. The objective of this study is to extend the results of our previous study to the pandemic's second wave.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This prospective cohort study was conducted from May 8, 2020, to January 24, 2021, and includes 787 HCW. Symptoms of anxiety and depression were assessed using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Descriptive statistics illustrated the evolution of psychological distress indicators, whereas latent class analysis helped identify trajectories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that a lower proportion of HCW exceeded the clinical threshold during the second wave (36,5% vs. 31,1%). As in the first wave, most of our sample fell onto the resilient trajectory (67.22%). We adapted the name of the remaining trajectories to better suit their evolution: rapid recovery (15.76%), slow recovery (9.66%), and delayed (7.37%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Approximately two-thirds of the HCW did not manifest significant distress. For those who did, the distress was transient. We observed a trend of positive adaptability among HCW, considering that the proportion of HCW experiencing psychological distress exceeding clinical threshold remained lower than during the first wave. Our data highlight the dynamic nature of psychological distress. To be able to detect psychological distress as it arises, HCW should use self-monitoring as an essential tool. This vigilance would allow institutions to offer timely support and resources for those experiencing psychological distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":52315,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Stress","volume":" ","pages":"24705470221108144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2d/40/10.1177_24705470221108144.PMC9228638.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24705470221108144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Health care workers (HCW) exposed to COVID-19 risk experiencing psychological distress. Little is known regarding longitudinal perspectives and evolutions of psychological distress within this population. The objective of this study is to extend the results of our previous study to the pandemic's second wave.

Method: This prospective cohort study was conducted from May 8, 2020, to January 24, 2021, and includes 787 HCW. Symptoms of anxiety and depression were assessed using the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Descriptive statistics illustrated the evolution of psychological distress indicators, whereas latent class analysis helped identify trajectories.

Results: The results showed that a lower proportion of HCW exceeded the clinical threshold during the second wave (36,5% vs. 31,1%). As in the first wave, most of our sample fell onto the resilient trajectory (67.22%). We adapted the name of the remaining trajectories to better suit their evolution: rapid recovery (15.76%), slow recovery (9.66%), and delayed (7.37%).

Conclusion: Approximately two-thirds of the HCW did not manifest significant distress. For those who did, the distress was transient. We observed a trend of positive adaptability among HCW, considering that the proportion of HCW experiencing psychological distress exceeding clinical threshold remained lower than during the first wave. Our data highlight the dynamic nature of psychological distress. To be able to detect psychological distress as it arises, HCW should use self-monitoring as an essential tool. This vigilance would allow institutions to offer timely support and resources for those experiencing psychological distress.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

前两波COVID-19期间医护人员心理困扰的评估:加拿大纵向研究的随访
背景:暴露于COVID-19风险的卫生保健工作者(HCW)存在心理困扰。在这一人群中,人们对心理困扰的纵向观点和演变知之甚少。这项研究的目的是将我们以前的研究结果扩展到大流行的第二波。方法:本前瞻性队列研究于2020年5月8日至2021年1月24日进行,纳入787例HCW患者。使用广泛性焦虑障碍-7 (GAD-7)和患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)评估焦虑和抑郁症状。描述性统计说明了心理困扰指标的演变,而潜在阶级分析有助于确定轨迹。结果:第二波HCW超过临床阈值的比例较低(36.5% vs. 31.1%)。与第一波一样,我们的大多数样本落入了弹性轨迹(67.22%)。我们调整了其余轨迹的名称,以更好地适应它们的演变:快速恢复(15.76%),缓慢恢复(9.66%)和延迟(7.37%)。结论:大约三分之二的HCW没有表现出明显的痛苦。对那些做了这件事的人来说,痛苦是短暂的。考虑到心理困扰超过临床阈值的比例仍低于第一波,我们观察到HCW的积极适应趋势。我们的数据强调了心理困扰的动态本质。为了能够在心理困扰出现时发现它,HCW应该将自我监控作为一种基本工具。这种警惕将使机构能够为那些经历心理困扰的人提供及时的支持和资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chronic Stress
Chronic Stress Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信