The influence of external stressors on physiological testing: Implication for return-to-play protocols

IF 2.1 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Chase J. Ellingson , Jyotpal Singh , Cody A. Ellingson , Ryan Dech , Jaroslaw Piskorski , J. Patrick Neary
{"title":"The influence of external stressors on physiological testing: Implication for return-to-play protocols","authors":"Chase J. Ellingson ,&nbsp;Jyotpal Singh ,&nbsp;Cody A. Ellingson ,&nbsp;Ryan Dech ,&nbsp;Jaroslaw Piskorski ,&nbsp;J. Patrick Neary","doi":"10.1016/j.crphys.2022.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>External stressors such as alcohol, caffeine, and vigorous exercise are known to alter cellular homeostasis, affecting the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and overall physiological function. However, little direct evidence exists quantifying the impact of these external stressors on physiological testing. We assessed the impact of the above-listed stressors on spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), heart rate variability (HRV), heart rate asymmetry (HRA), and systolic blood pressure variability (BPV). Seventeen male university varsity American-style football athletes completed two identical assessments on separate days, once presenting with one or more stressors (recent intake of caffeine, alcohol, or exercise participation; contraindicated assessment) and another with no stressors present (repeat assessment). Both assessments were conducted within one week and at the same time of day. The testing protocol consisted of 5-min of rest followed by 5-min of a squat-stand maneuver (0.05 Hz). Continuous beat-to-beat blood pressure and electrocardiogram measurements were collected and allowed for calculations of BRS, HRV, HRA, and BPV. Significant decreases (p &lt; 0.05) in HRV and HRA metrics (SDNN, SD2, SDNNd, SDNNa, SD2a, SD2d), HRV total power, and BRS-up sequence were found during the contraindicated assessment in comparison to the repeat assessment. When assessing those with exercise as their only stressor, high-frequency HRV and BRS-pooled were significantly decreased and increased, respectively, during the contraindicated assessment. Pre-season physiological baseline testing in sport is becoming increasingly prevalent and thus must consider external stressors to ascertain accurate and reliable data. This data confirms the need for stringent and standardized guidelines for pre-participation baseline physiological testing.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72753,"journal":{"name":"Current research in physiology","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 240-245"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d7/3b/main.PMC9213225.pdf","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665944122000268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

External stressors such as alcohol, caffeine, and vigorous exercise are known to alter cellular homeostasis, affecting the autonomic nervous system (ANS) and overall physiological function. However, little direct evidence exists quantifying the impact of these external stressors on physiological testing. We assessed the impact of the above-listed stressors on spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity (BRS), heart rate variability (HRV), heart rate asymmetry (HRA), and systolic blood pressure variability (BPV). Seventeen male university varsity American-style football athletes completed two identical assessments on separate days, once presenting with one or more stressors (recent intake of caffeine, alcohol, or exercise participation; contraindicated assessment) and another with no stressors present (repeat assessment). Both assessments were conducted within one week and at the same time of day. The testing protocol consisted of 5-min of rest followed by 5-min of a squat-stand maneuver (0.05 Hz). Continuous beat-to-beat blood pressure and electrocardiogram measurements were collected and allowed for calculations of BRS, HRV, HRA, and BPV. Significant decreases (p < 0.05) in HRV and HRA metrics (SDNN, SD2, SDNNd, SDNNa, SD2a, SD2d), HRV total power, and BRS-up sequence were found during the contraindicated assessment in comparison to the repeat assessment. When assessing those with exercise as their only stressor, high-frequency HRV and BRS-pooled were significantly decreased and increased, respectively, during the contraindicated assessment. Pre-season physiological baseline testing in sport is becoming increasingly prevalent and thus must consider external stressors to ascertain accurate and reliable data. This data confirms the need for stringent and standardized guidelines for pre-participation baseline physiological testing.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

外部应激源对生理测试的影响:对回归比赛方案的启示
外界压力源如酒精、咖啡因和剧烈运动可以改变细胞稳态,影响自主神经系统(ANS)和整体生理功能。然而,很少有直接证据量化这些外部压力源对生理测试的影响。我们评估了上述应激源对自发性压反射敏感性(BRS)、心率变异性(HRV)、心率不对称性(HRA)和收缩压变异性(BPV)的影响。17名男性美式足球大学校队运动员在不同的日子里完成了两项相同的评估,其中一次表现出一种或多种压力源(最近摄入咖啡因、酒精或参加锻炼;禁忌症评估)和另一个没有压力源存在(重复评估)。两项评估均在一周内和一天的同一时间进行。测试方案包括休息5分钟,然后进行5分钟蹲立动作(0.05 Hz)。收集连续搏动血压和心电图测量数据,计算BRS、HRV、HRA和BPV。显著下降(p <与重复评估相比,禁忌评估中HRV和HRA指标(SDNN、SD2、SDNNd、SDNNa、SD2a、SD2d)、HRV总功率和br -up序列的差异均为0.05)。当评估以运动为唯一应激源的患者时,在禁忌症评估期间,高频HRV和BRS-pooled分别显著降低和增加。在体育运动中,季前生理基线测试变得越来越普遍,因此必须考虑外部压力因素以确定准确可靠的数据。这一数据证实了为参与前基线生理测试制定严格和标准化指南的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
62 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信