Expectations in the Communication About Death and Dying: Development and Initial Validation of the End-of-Life Conversations - Expectations Scale.

Omega Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-24 DOI:10.1177/00302228221110726
Yannik Bendel, Martin Pinquart, Christian Schulz-Quach, Pia von Blanckenburg
{"title":"Expectations in the Communication About Death and Dying: Development and Initial Validation of the End-of-Life Conversations - Expectations Scale.","authors":"Yannik Bendel, Martin Pinquart, Christian Schulz-Quach, Pia von Blanckenburg","doi":"10.1177/00302228221110726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>End-of-life (EOL) conversations with relatives or significant others are often avoided. One reason can be negative expectations regarding these conversations. The present study was conducted to develop and initially validate the End-of-Life Conversations - Expectations Scale (EOLC-E). An exploratory factor analysis (<i>N</i> = 307) resulted in a 20-item version with three distinct dimensions: expected own emotional burden (α = .92), expected other person's emotional burden (α = .94) and communication self-efficacy (α = .89). The EOLC-E total score correlated significantly with communication apprehension about death (<i>r</i> = .62), fear of death (<i>r</i> = .58), death avoidance (<i>r</i> = .52) as well as readiness for end-of-life conversations (<i>r</i> = -.38) and occurrence of previous conversations (<i>r</i> = -.29). Results suggest that the EOLC-E is a reliable and valid instrument to assess death and dying communication expectations. This measure has utility in communication research focusing on optimizing expectations and increasing EOL communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":74338,"journal":{"name":"Omega","volume":" ","pages":"710-725"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528861/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228221110726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

End-of-life (EOL) conversations with relatives or significant others are often avoided. One reason can be negative expectations regarding these conversations. The present study was conducted to develop and initially validate the End-of-Life Conversations - Expectations Scale (EOLC-E). An exploratory factor analysis (N = 307) resulted in a 20-item version with three distinct dimensions: expected own emotional burden (α = .92), expected other person's emotional burden (α = .94) and communication self-efficacy (α = .89). The EOLC-E total score correlated significantly with communication apprehension about death (r = .62), fear of death (r = .58), death avoidance (r = .52) as well as readiness for end-of-life conversations (r = -.38) and occurrence of previous conversations (r = -.29). Results suggest that the EOLC-E is a reliable and valid instrument to assess death and dying communication expectations. This measure has utility in communication research focusing on optimizing expectations and increasing EOL communication.

关于死亡和临终交流的期望:生命末期对话--期望量表的开发与初步验证。
人们往往避免与亲属或重要他人进行生命末期(EOL)谈话。其中一个原因可能是人们对这些谈话抱有负面期望。本研究旨在开发并初步验证 "生命末期谈话-期望量表"(EOLC-E)。探索性因子分析(N = 307)得出了一个包含 20 个项目的版本,其中有三个不同的维度:预期自己的情感负担(α = .92)、预期他人的情感负担(α = .94)和沟通自我效能感(α = .89)。EOLC-E总分与临终交流中对死亡的担忧(r = .62)、对死亡的恐惧(r = .58)、对死亡的回避(r = .52)以及临终对话的准备程度(r = -.38)和以往对话的发生率(r = -.29)显著相关。结果表明,EOLC-E 是评估死亡和临终沟通期望的可靠而有效的工具。该测量方法在以优化期望和增加临终沟通为重点的沟通研究中具有实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信