Care teams misunderstand what most upsets patients about their care

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Alana L. Conner , Beatrice V. Podtschaske , Mary Carol Mazza , Dani L. Zionts , Elizabeth J. Malcolm , Carey C. Thomson , Sara J. Singer , Arnold Milstein
{"title":"Care teams misunderstand what most upsets patients about their care","authors":"Alana L. Conner ,&nbsp;Beatrice V. Podtschaske ,&nbsp;Mary Carol Mazza ,&nbsp;Dani L. Zionts ,&nbsp;Elizabeth J. Malcolm ,&nbsp;Carey C. Thomson ,&nbsp;Sara J. Singer ,&nbsp;Arnold Milstein","doi":"10.1016/j.hjdsi.2022.100657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Negative healthcare delivery experiences can cause lasting patient distress and medical service misuse and disuse. Yet no multi-site study has examined whether care-team members understand what most upsets patients about their care.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We interviewed 373 patients and 360 care-team members in the medical oncology and ambulatory surgery clinics of 11 major healthcare organizations across six U.S. census regions. Patients deeply upset by a service-related experience (<em>n =</em> 99, 27%) answered questions about that experience, while care-team members (n = 360) answered questions about their beliefs regarding what most upsets patients. We performed content analysis to identify memorably upsetting care (MUC) themes; a generalized estimating equation to explore whether MUC theme mention frequencies varied by participant role (care-team member vs. patient), specialty (oncology vs. surgery), facility (academic vs. community), and gender; and logistic regressions to investigate the effects of participant characteristics on individual themes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>MUC themes included three <em>systems issues</em> (<em>inefficiencies, access barriers,</em> and <em>facilities problems)</em> and four <em>care-team issues</em> (<em>miscommunication, neglect, coldness,</em> and <em>incompetence</em>). MUC theme frequencies differed by role (all Ps &lt; 0.001), with more patients mentioning care-team coldness (OR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.23-0.60) and incompetence (OR = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.09-0.31); but more care-team members mentioning system inefficiencies (OR = 7.01; 95% CI, 4.31–11.40) and access barriers (OR, 5.48; 95% CI, 2.81–10.69).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>When considering which service experiences most upset patients, care-team members underestimate the impact of their own behaviors and overestimate the impact of systems issues.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>Healthcare systems should reconsider how they collect, interpret, disseminate, and respond to patient service reports.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>Level III.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":29963,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","volume":"10 4","pages":"Article 100657"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221307642200046X/pdfft?md5=0f7aa976f167ed7e05d0cf83f34a2434&pid=1-s2.0-S221307642200046X-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare-The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221307642200046X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

Negative healthcare delivery experiences can cause lasting patient distress and medical service misuse and disuse. Yet no multi-site study has examined whether care-team members understand what most upsets patients about their care.

Methods

We interviewed 373 patients and 360 care-team members in the medical oncology and ambulatory surgery clinics of 11 major healthcare organizations across six U.S. census regions. Patients deeply upset by a service-related experience (n = 99, 27%) answered questions about that experience, while care-team members (n = 360) answered questions about their beliefs regarding what most upsets patients. We performed content analysis to identify memorably upsetting care (MUC) themes; a generalized estimating equation to explore whether MUC theme mention frequencies varied by participant role (care-team member vs. patient), specialty (oncology vs. surgery), facility (academic vs. community), and gender; and logistic regressions to investigate the effects of participant characteristics on individual themes.

Results

MUC themes included three systems issues (inefficiencies, access barriers, and facilities problems) and four care-team issues (miscommunication, neglect, coldness, and incompetence). MUC theme frequencies differed by role (all Ps < 0.001), with more patients mentioning care-team coldness (OR = 0.37; 95% CI, 0.23-0.60) and incompetence (OR = 0.17; 95% CI, 0.09-0.31); but more care-team members mentioning system inefficiencies (OR = 7.01; 95% CI, 4.31–11.40) and access barriers (OR, 5.48; 95% CI, 2.81–10.69).

Conclusions

When considering which service experiences most upset patients, care-team members underestimate the impact of their own behaviors and overestimate the impact of systems issues.

Implications

Healthcare systems should reconsider how they collect, interpret, disseminate, and respond to patient service reports.

Level of evidence

Level III.

护理团队误解了他们的护理中最让病人不安的地方
背景:负面的医疗服务体验会导致患者持续的痛苦和医疗服务的误用和废弃。然而,没有一项多地点研究调查过护理团队成员是否了解他们的护理中最让病人不安的是什么。方法:我们在美国6个人口普查地区的11个主要医疗机构的内科肿瘤学和门诊外科诊所采访了373名患者和360名护理团队成员。因服务相关经历而深感不安的患者(n = 99, 27%)回答了有关该经历的问题,而护理团队成员(n = 360)回答了有关他们认为最令患者不安的事情的问题。我们进行了内容分析,以确定令人难忘的烦恼护理(MUC)主题;一个广义估计方程,用于探讨MUC主题提及频率是否因参与者角色(护理团队成员与患者)、专业(肿瘤与外科)、机构(学术与社区)和性别而异;并采用logistic回归研究被试特征对个体主题的影响。结果smuc主题包括3个系统问题(效率低下、准入障碍和设施问题)和4个护理团队问题(沟通不畅、忽视、冷漠和无能)。MUC主题频率因角色而异(所有Ps <0.001),更多的患者提到护理团队的冷漠(OR = 0.37;95% CI, 0.23-0.60)和不胜任(OR = 0.17;95% ci, 0.09-0.31);但更多的护理团队成员提到系统效率低下(OR = 7.01;95% CI, 4.31-11.40)和准入障碍(OR, 5.48;95% ci, 2.81-10.69)。结论:在考虑哪些服务经历最让患者感到不安时,护理团队成员低估了自身行为的影响,而高估了系统问题的影响。卫生保健系统应该重新考虑他们如何收集、解释、传播和回应病人服务报告。证据等级:III级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: HealthCare: The Journal of Delivery Science and Innovation is a quarterly journal. The journal promotes cutting edge research on innovation in healthcare delivery, including improvements in systems, processes, management, and applied information technology. The journal welcomes submissions of original research articles, case studies capturing "policy to practice" or "implementation of best practices", commentaries, and critical reviews of relevant novel programs and products. The scope of the journal includes topics directly related to delivering healthcare, such as: ● Care redesign ● Applied health IT ● Payment innovation ● Managerial innovation ● Quality improvement (QI) research ● New training and education models ● Comparative delivery innovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信