Use of Drugs Associated with QT Interval Prolongation at the Hospital Level during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Colombia.

IF 2.5 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
International Journal of Vascular Medicine Pub Date : 2022-09-21 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/3045942
Andrés Gaviria-Mendoza, Manuel Enrique Machado-Duque, Luis Fernando Valladales-Restrepo, Carlos Fernando Tovar-Yepes, Jorge Enrique Machado-Alba
{"title":"Use of Drugs Associated with QT Interval Prolongation at the Hospital Level during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Colombia.","authors":"Andrés Gaviria-Mendoza,&nbsp;Manuel Enrique Machado-Duque,&nbsp;Luis Fernando Valladales-Restrepo,&nbsp;Carlos Fernando Tovar-Yepes,&nbsp;Jorge Enrique Machado-Alba","doi":"10.1155/2022/3045942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many of the therapeutic proposals for COVID-19 have been associated with adverse effects, including the risk of QT interval prolongation and torsades de pointes (TdP). The objective was to determine the use of drugs with a risk of QT interval prolongation in 21 clinics/hospitals in Colombia from January to December 2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study identified drug use according to pharmacological groups with potential risk of QT interval prolongation according to a risk classification: conditional, possible, and known risk of TdP. Descriptive analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 355,574 patients who received QT-prolonging drugs were identified (equivalent to 51.4% of all inpatients treated during the study period). Of the group of patients on QT drugs, 54.4% used at least one drug with conditional risk, 52.6% with possible risk, and 40.3% with known risk. The most commonly used belonged to the group of drugs for the nervous system (63.0%), alimentary tract and metabolism (56.8%), anti-infectives for systemic use (13.0%), and the cardiovascular system (11.7%). On average, patients received 2.0 ± 1.5 risk drugs. Regarding drugs initially considered against COVID-19, 2,120 patients (0.6%) received azithromycin, 802 (0.2%) received chloroquine, 517 received hydroxychloroquine (0.1%), and 265 received lopinavir/ritonavir (0.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The high proportion of patients treated at the hospital level who receive drugs with risk of prolonging the QT interval should alert those responsible for their care to avoid fatal outcomes, especially during the COVID-19 epidemic, when some QT drugs are being used more frequently.</p>","PeriodicalId":14448,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9520316/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3045942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many of the therapeutic proposals for COVID-19 have been associated with adverse effects, including the risk of QT interval prolongation and torsades de pointes (TdP). The objective was to determine the use of drugs with a risk of QT interval prolongation in 21 clinics/hospitals in Colombia from January to December 2020.

Methods: This cross-sectional study identified drug use according to pharmacological groups with potential risk of QT interval prolongation according to a risk classification: conditional, possible, and known risk of TdP. Descriptive analyses were performed.

Results: A total of 355,574 patients who received QT-prolonging drugs were identified (equivalent to 51.4% of all inpatients treated during the study period). Of the group of patients on QT drugs, 54.4% used at least one drug with conditional risk, 52.6% with possible risk, and 40.3% with known risk. The most commonly used belonged to the group of drugs for the nervous system (63.0%), alimentary tract and metabolism (56.8%), anti-infectives for systemic use (13.0%), and the cardiovascular system (11.7%). On average, patients received 2.0 ± 1.5 risk drugs. Regarding drugs initially considered against COVID-19, 2,120 patients (0.6%) received azithromycin, 802 (0.2%) received chloroquine, 517 received hydroxychloroquine (0.1%), and 265 received lopinavir/ritonavir (0.1%).

Conclusion: The high proportion of patients treated at the hospital level who receive drugs with risk of prolonging the QT interval should alert those responsible for their care to avoid fatal outcomes, especially during the COVID-19 epidemic, when some QT drugs are being used more frequently.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

哥伦比亚COVID-19大流行期间医院层面与QT间期延长相关的药物使用
背景:许多针对COVID-19的治疗方案都与不良反应相关,包括QT间期延长和点扭转(TdP)的风险。目的是确定2020年1月至12月期间哥伦比亚21家诊所/医院中存在QT间期延长风险的药物使用情况。方法:本横断面研究根据具有QT间期延长潜在风险的药理学组,根据TdP的风险分类:有条件的、可能的和已知的风险,确定药物使用。进行描述性分析。结果:共有355,574例患者接受了延长qt的药物治疗(相当于研究期间所有住院患者的51.4%)。在QT药物组中,54.4%的患者至少使用一种有条件风险的药物,52.6%有可能风险,40.3%有已知风险。使用最多的是神经系统(63.0%)、消化道和代谢(56.8%)、全身抗感染(13.0%)和心血管系统(11.7%)。患者平均使用2.0±1.5种危险药物。在初步考虑的抗新冠肺炎药物中,阿奇霉素2120例(0.6%),氯喹802例(0.2%),羟氯喹517例(0.1%),洛匹那韦/利托那韦265例(0.1%)。结论:在医院接受治疗的患者中,使用有延长QT间期风险的药物的比例很高,应提醒负责其护理的人员避免致命的后果,特别是在COVID-19流行期间,当一些QT间期药物使用更频繁时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Vascular Medicine
International Journal of Vascular Medicine PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信