RPC-Lex: A dictionary to measure German right-wing populist conspiracy discourse online.

Convergence (London, England) Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-21 DOI:10.1177/13548565221109440
Cornelius Puschmann, Hevin Karakurt, Carolin Amlinger, Nicola Gess, Oliver Nachtwey
{"title":"RPC-Lex: A dictionary to measure German right-wing populist conspiracy discourse online.","authors":"Cornelius Puschmann,&nbsp;Hevin Karakurt,&nbsp;Carolin Amlinger,&nbsp;Nicola Gess,&nbsp;Oliver Nachtwey","doi":"10.1177/13548565221109440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We describe a novel computational dictionary for the study of right-wing populist conspiracy discourse (<i>RPC</i>) on the internet, specifically in the context of contemporary German politics. After first presenting our definition of conspiracy discourse and grounding it in antecedent research on mediated rhetoric at the intersection of right-wing populism and conspiracy theory, we proceed by outlining our approach to dictionary construction, relying on a combination of manual and automated methods. We validate our dictionary via parallel manual coding of 2,500 sentences using the categories contained in the dictionary as labels and compare the consensus result with the label assigned to each sentence by the dictionary, achieving satisfactory results. We then test our approach on two different datasets composed of alternative news articles and Facebook comments that spread conspiracy theories. Finally, we summarize our observations both on the methodological premises of the approach and on the object of populist right-wing conspiracy discourse and its dynamics more broadly. We close with an outlook on the potentials and limitations of the dictionary-based approach and future directions in applications of content analysis to the study of conspiracy discourse.</p>","PeriodicalId":72707,"journal":{"name":"Convergence (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"1144-1171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9515517/pdf/","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Convergence (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565221109440","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

We describe a novel computational dictionary for the study of right-wing populist conspiracy discourse (RPC) on the internet, specifically in the context of contemporary German politics. After first presenting our definition of conspiracy discourse and grounding it in antecedent research on mediated rhetoric at the intersection of right-wing populism and conspiracy theory, we proceed by outlining our approach to dictionary construction, relying on a combination of manual and automated methods. We validate our dictionary via parallel manual coding of 2,500 sentences using the categories contained in the dictionary as labels and compare the consensus result with the label assigned to each sentence by the dictionary, achieving satisfactory results. We then test our approach on two different datasets composed of alternative news articles and Facebook comments that spread conspiracy theories. Finally, we summarize our observations both on the methodological premises of the approach and on the object of populist right-wing conspiracy discourse and its dynamics more broadly. We close with an outlook on the potentials and limitations of the dictionary-based approach and future directions in applications of content analysis to the study of conspiracy discourse.

RPC-Lex:一本衡量德国右翼民粹主义阴谋论的在线词典。
我们描述了一个新的计算字典右翼民粹主义阴谋话语(RPC)在互联网上的研究,特别是在当代德国政治的背景下。首先介绍了我们对阴谋话语的定义,并将其建立在对右翼民粹主义和阴谋论交叉点的中介修辞的先前研究基础之上,我们接着概述了我们的词典构建方法,依赖于手动和自动方法的结合。我们使用字典中包含的类别作为标签,通过对2500个句子进行并行手工编码来验证我们的字典,并将共识结果与字典分配给每个句子的标签进行比较,获得了令人满意的结果。然后,我们在两个不同的数据集上测试我们的方法,这些数据集由传播阴谋论的替代新闻文章和Facebook评论组成。最后,我们总结了我们对该方法的方法论前提和民粹主义右翼阴谋话语的对象及其更广泛的动态的观察。最后,我们展望了基于词典的方法的潜力和局限性,以及将内容分析应用于阴谋话语研究的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信